Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02222
Original file (BC-2003-02222.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02222
            INDEX CODE:  112.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His five-month extension be changed to a three-month extension.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He is supposed to be relieved from active duty  on  16  November  2003.   He
extended his enlistment to go to Korea and had to extend his  enlistment  to
16 February 2004.  However, his enlistment was extended to 16 April 2004.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 17 November 1999  in  the
grade of airman basic for a period of four years with a date  of  separation
(DOS) of 16 November 2003.  The applicant is currently serving in the  grade
of senior airman effective and with a date of rank (DOR) of 17 March 2002.

On 4 December 2001, the applicant extended his  enlistment  for  five-months
to qualify for an assignment.

Based on the five-month extension, the applicant’s date of separation is  16
April 2004.

_________________________________________________________________






AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAE recommended denial.  They indicated that the applicant  initialed
and acknowledged the validity of the extension form in  December  2001.   He
initialed next to the block showing him what his new DOS was  going  to  be.
At the time he signed the extension  form  he  should  have  questioned  any
discrepancies, not almost two years later.

The evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 29 August 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the
applicant for review and response within 30  days.   As  of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case;  however,  the  Board
agrees with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt  their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant  has  not  been
the victim of an error or injustice.  On  4  December  2001,  the  applicant
extended his enlistment of 17 November 1999 for five months to  qualify  for
a permanent change of station (PCS) assignment.   The  extension  created  a
new date of separation (DOS) of 16 April 2004.   The  applicant  signed  and
initialed the extension form in December 2001, indicating what his  new  DOS
was going to be.   The  applicant  has  not  established  that  he  did  not
understand the terms of his extension contract.  The Board believes that  if
he had a problem understanding the form he should have raised any  questions
or concerns he had at that time.  Therefore, in the absence of  evidence  to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting  the  relief
sought.

_________________________________________________________________





THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice; that the application  was  denied
without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the  application  will  only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2003-
02222 in Executive Session on 2 October 2003, under the  provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

                 Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
                 Mr. J. Dean Yount, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Military Personnel Records.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPPAE, dated 21 August 2003.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 August 2003.




                       WAYNE R. GRACIE
                       Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00628

    Original file (BC-2002-00628.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00628 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in his new career field (3E0X2) rather than the SRB from his previous career field (3E5X1). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0203473

    Original file (0203473.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 April 2000, the applicant, who had an established date of separation (DOS) of 25 April 2000, reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of 4 years, thereby establishing a new DOS of 13 April 2004. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded by stating that on his AF Form 1411, Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, it reflects that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01757

    Original file (BC-2004-01757.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 21 May 2003, the applicant signed and initialed AF Form 3009, Change to Enlistment Agreement - United States Air Force, for payment of an $18,000 IEB for the Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 1C231 upon completion of technical training. The Board notes the applicant signed and initialed an enlistment agreement for payment of an $18,000.00 IEB upon completion of technical training in AFSC 1C231.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00648

    Original file (BC-2003-00648.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE indicated that the applicant’s RE code of “2C” - Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry-level separation without characterization of service is correct. The evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a response that is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC2006-02019

    Original file (BC2006-02019.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02019 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 JAN 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, be corrected to reflect Senior Airman (SrA). She was brought onto active duty as an A1C with a date of rank (DOR) of 28...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03336

    Original file (BC-2002-03336.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 March 2000, he was separated under the provisions of AFR 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Dec 02, w/atchs....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00455

    Original file (BC-2003-00455.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Toward the end of basic training, he received orders. AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE stated that the applicant separated on 9 June 1994, after serving 3 months and 29 days active service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 9 June 1994, he was separated under the provisions of AFR 39-10...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000152

    Original file (0000152.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The recommendation for discharge for misconduct was approved and the commander directed that applicant be given an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. On 23 Dec 83, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39- 10 (Misconduct-Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions) in the grade of airman first class with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge and an RE code of 2B (Separated with other than an honorable discharge). Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01942

    Original file (BC-2007-01942.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01942 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 DECEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the Initial Enlistment Bonus (IEB) for the Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 1C431, Tactical Air Command and Control Apprentice. DPPAE reviewed the documentation submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-02219

    Original file (BC-2003-02219.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s military personnel records reveal that, on 8 March 1997, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (completion of active required service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR states the applicant’s service dates and date of rank to the grade of E-4 are correct. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).