RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-02190
INDEX CODE 106.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His 1957 general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes his discharge was upgraded to honorable 30 years ago. He
needs paperwork to replace what he has misplaced.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s military records with regard to the discharge are
scant. The available records reveal he enlisted in the Regular Air
Force on 29 Aug 55 for four years.
On 23 Oct 56, he pled guilty and was found guilty by a Summary Court-
Martial (SCM) of failure to go to his place of duty on 20 and 22 Oct
56. He was confined to hard labor for one month and forfeited $30.00.
On 26 Oct 56, he was reduced from airman third class to airman basic
for misconduct or inefficiency.
An undated memo by the applicant’s commander reports that his
efficiency was satisfactory and his character was good. However, the
commander also noted the applicant was not always prompt for work, had
a tendency to be late for formations, required maximum supervision,
and needed constant instructions on maintaining military appearances
and orderly quarters. An 18 Sep 57 memo from the discharge authority
ordered a general discharge.
On 25 Sep 57, after two years and seven days of active service, the
applicant was released from active duty for the convenience of the
government with a general characterization and transferred to the Air
Force Reserves on 26 Sep 57.
He was redesignated as Standby Reserve on 16 Nov 57 and was honorably
discharged from the Air Force Reserves for the convenience of the
government prior to expiration of term of service effective 31 Jul 61.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report, which is
attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS believes the 25 Sep 57 general discharge was consistent
with the discharge regulation in effect at the time and within the
discretion of the discharge authority. They believe the honorable
discharge the applicant referred to in his appeal was the honorable
discharge he received from the Air Force Reserve on 31 Jul 61. Denial
is recommended.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 1 Aug 03 for review and comment within 30 days. This
office received no response and, on 14 Aug 03, the AFBCMR Staff
invited the applicant to submit post-service information in support of
his case. The applicant responded with a statement and two character
references, one from a cousin and another from a former employer. He
claimed he told a review board that questioned him about the SCM that
he did not like being in the Air Force, especially if he could not be
with the Air Police. He also alleged that a year after his discharge
he became the single parent of a son who now serves as a policeman. He
received custody of a younger son, who lives with him still. He is now
retired after working for over 30 years at Rutger’s University. He
believes he’s learned a great deal over the years.
A complete copy of applicant’s response, with attachments, is at
Exhibit G.
On 28 Aug 03, the AFBCMR Staff forwarded a copy of the FBI Report
(Exhibit C) to the applicant for review and comment within 14 days. As
of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
available evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are
not persuaded that his 1957 general discharge from active duty should
be upgraded. The applicant has provided no persuasive evidence that
his discharge was improper or contrary to the provisions of the
governing regulations in effect at the time, or that the actions taken
against him were based on factors other than his own misconduct. We
noted the character references submitted in his behalf from a cousin
and a former employer. However, the FBI Report reveals that the
applicant’s misconduct continued after his discharge. In our view, his
somewhat sparse submission does not overcome his military and post-
service transgressions. Having found no error or injustice with regard
to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military
member, or a sufficient basis for clemency, we conclude that this
appeal should be denied.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 2 October 2003 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
Mr. J. Dean Yount, Member
The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-02190 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Jul 03.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 28 Jul 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Aug 03.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 14 Aug 03
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 20 Aug 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 Aug 03.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02190
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02190 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His appeal to have his 1957 general discharge upgraded to honorable be reconsidered. An FBI Report revealed a 1963 Arrest 001 for weapons possession with no disposition indicated, a 1964 Arrest 002 for unauthorized use...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00457
One previous conviction was considered in this case. He was credited with 2 years, 4 months, and 3 days of active military service (excludes 151 days lost time due to confinement). The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-04023A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04023 INDEX CODE: 113.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his records be corrected to show his service in Guam from 1955 through 1957. After a thorough review of the evidence presented, we believe that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01143
He further acknowledged he understood he could receive a discharge under conditions other than honorable and receive an undesirable discharge that could deprive him of any rights to receive veterans’ benefits in the future. On 30 August 1957, the base and wing commanders recommended approval of the applicant’s discharge with an undesirable discharge. The discharge authority approved the discharge on 9 September 1957 and ordered an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02895
Applicant has also requested that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. After reviewing applicant’s overall record of service and based on the fact that under today’s standards he would receive an honorable discharge, we recommend approval of his request for an upgrade of his discharge. Show that on 26 April 1957, he was honorably discharged in the grade of master sergeant and furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02418
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 0202418 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded so he can be buried in a national cemetery. AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant's sister...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01029 INDEX CODE: A50.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge be upgraded to general. The evidence of record reflects that the applicant was discharged for unfitness. Exhibit F. Letter, applicant, dated 13 Jul 02, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02327
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 12 Aug 05, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). Were you provided a response on a timely basis? No c. Could be improved d. N/A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS The Record of Proceedings (ROP) contains a summary of your request, your contentions, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00146
In support of his request, the applicant submits personal statements and copies of her father’s DD Form 214 and Statement of Service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). After considering the evidence and testimony, the Board of Officers determined that the former member should be discharged with an undesirable discharge because of unfitness.
He recommended that applicant be discharged from the service. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant indicated that he is now retired and a member of the American Legion. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Mar 02, w/atchs.