Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02116
Original file (BC-2003-02116.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:            DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02116
                 INDEX CODE:  108.09
                 COUNSEL:  NONE

                 HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her effective date and date of rank to the grade of airman first class  (E-
3) be corrected to reflect 20 February 2002.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She enlisted into the Air Force Reserve on 20 February 2002 in an Air  Force
Specialty (AFS) that is authorized a bonus.  IAW AFRCI  36-2001,  Table  6.1
rule 6 she is entitled to the "stripes  for  unit  bonus  skills  enlistment
option."   When  she  attended  3  level  training,  several   Guard/Reserve
personnel brought to her attention that she should  have  been  wearing  AlC
stripes.

In support of this application, the applicant submits a copy of her DD  Form
4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of  the  United  States,  a
copy of AF Form  4021,  Application  for  Incentive  Participation,  and  an
extract from ARRCI 36-2001.  Her complete submission,  with  attachments  is
at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted as an airman basic in the Air Force  Reserves  for  a
period of 6 years on 20 February 2002.  She  is  currently  serving  in  the
grade of (E-2) Airman.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFRC/DPM recommends denial.  Upon review of the  applicant's  duty  history,
it reflects that the member entered her first duty assignment as  an  X4N0X1
at Andrews AFB.  Although AFSC 4N0X1 is a bonus AFSC, AFSC X4N0X1 is  not  a
bonus AFSC at Andrews AFB.  Therefore, the member is not  eligible  for  the
bonus program, or the stripes for unit bonus skills  upon  entry.   The  DPM
evaluation is at Exhibit B.

___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  1
August 2003 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of  this  date,  this
office has received no response.

__________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  In this respect, Air Force Specialty  Code
(AFSC) 4N0X1 is an AFSC that is authorized grade advance under the  "stripes
for unit bonus skills enlistment option."  However, the applicant's AFSC  is
X4N0X1, which it appears is not  on  the  list  of  AFSCs  authorized  grade
advancement under the aforementioned program.  Therefore, we agree with  the
opinion  and  recommendation  of   the   Air   Force   office   of   primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the  basis  for  our  conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an  error  or  injustice.   In
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we  find  no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2003-
02116 in Executive Session on 3 Sep 03, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Panel Chair
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
      Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 Jun 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFRC/DPM, dated 15 Jul 03.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Aug 03.




                                   BRENDA L. ROMINE
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-02949

    Original file (BC-2001-02949.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In order to qualify for the bonus, members in this AFSC located at McGuire had to reenlist for a period of six years (the applicant had reenlisted for two years on 13 Sep 01). In a letter dated 5 Oct 01 (Exhibit A), the UCA advised he had intended to counsel the applicant to delay reenlisting until the new bonus list came out on 1 Oct 01 to see if her AFSC would be on it. However, she was no longer eligible for the reenlistment bonus as she had since been reassigned to Willow Grove ARB...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04974

    Original file (BC 2013 04974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04974 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded an enlistment bonus for her Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC)/7-skill level and she be awarded the rank of airman first class. The applicant initialed and signed the DD Form 1966 continuation sheet that states both “Stripes for Unit Bonus Skills” and “Enlisting with Stripes for:” sections were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03920

    Original file (BC-2003-03920.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/DPM recommended denial noting the applicant was in a retraining status at the time of her promotion to TSgt and did not have a three- skill level in the promotion AFSC as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. AFRC/DPM indicated that as a result of the applicant’s DOR being changed to 1 Mar 02, she did not meet the two- year minimum time in grade requirement for promotion to the grade...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02838

    Original file (BC-2003-02838.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of applicant’s appeal, he submitted a personal statement; an email, dated 19 May 03, from his military personnel flight to 4th AF/DPM concerning contractual errors; Reserve Order P- 045 reflecting promotion to staff sergeant, effective 1 Jul 91; copies of a 1 Sep 91 training certificate, a Report of Individual Personnel (RIP), dated 31 Jul 91, and a DD Form 2AF (Reserve) ID Card issued 17 Aug 91, all reflecting the rank of staff sergeant; copies of DD Form 214, Certificate of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03878

    Original file (BC-2005-03878.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03878 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JUN 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The loss of good (satisfactory) years from Feb 03 to Sep 05 be reinstated, and she receive an enlisted incentive bonus payment and debt relief in the amount of $771.00 for Servicemember Group...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03263

    Original file (BC-2003-03263.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant began her IADT tour on 8 Nov 02 and completed the 8 months TIG requirement on 8 Jul 03, rendering her eligible for promotion to E-4 during the next (1 Sep 03) promotion cycle. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02087

    Original file (BC 2014 02087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/RSOO recommends denial. Current AFR enlistment incentive information is available in AFI 36-2638, Air Force Reserve Enlisted Incentives.” According to the AFRC Master Incentive Bonus List dated October 2011 - September 2012 effective at the time of the applicant’s enlistment (15 February 2013), AFSC 2A554B was not on the Master Incentive List for an enlistment bonus. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01965

    Original file (BC-2003-01965.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. __________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 September 1986, the applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard (ANG) at the age of 18 in the rank of airman basic (E-1) in the Air Force Specialty Code 43132E, Apprentice Strategic Aircraft Maintenance Specialist. On 9 November 2001, according to the Military Personnel Data System (MILPDS), the applicant enlisted in the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 05680

    Original file (BC 2014 05680.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05680 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date in rank (DOR) to the grade of airman first class (A1C/E-3) be changed to reflect his date of enlistment (DOE). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00910

    Original file (BC-2003-00910.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 4...