RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01220
INDEX CODE: 137.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record be changed to show he added his wife to his child only Survivor
Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On his last retiree account statement dated February 2003, he realized that
the SBP coverage for child, date of birth 2 November 1990, is still
effective. On 15 January 2003, he mailed a designation of beneficiary
information form with the information of his spouse thinking this would
change the SBP coverage to his spouse. He indicates that he has had no
contact with his child or the child’s mother for over five years. He has
no idea where they are located and he has tried to contact them over the
years without success. He was married on 1 September 2000 and would like
his spouse added to his SBP annuity coverage.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement, a
copy of his Marriage Certificate, dated 1 September 2000, AF Form 1266
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election, dated 25 August 1992, and other
documentation.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was unmarried and elected child only SBP coverage based on
full retired pay prior to his 1 November 1992 retirement date.
The applicant married on 1 September 2000, but he did not elect SBP
coverage for his spouse within the first year following his marriage.
On 14 January 2003, the applicant sent a request to the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service - Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL), designating his spouse as
the beneficiary to his unpaid retired pay in the event of his death.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPTR recommended denial. They indicated that the applicant claims he
submitted a request to change his beneficiary, however, that request was
submitted more than two years following his marriage. There is no record
that he submitted a request within the first year of marriage. SBP is
similar to commercial life insurance in that an individual must elect to
participate and pay the associated premiums in order to have coverage. His
monthly premium for child coverage is approximately $11; cost for spouse
and child coverage would be approximately $87 per month. Approval of this
request would provide the applicant an additional opportunity to elect SBP
coverage not afforded other retirees similarly situated and is not
justified. If relief is granted, retroactive costs approximate $1,900 plus
interest. If the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the applicant’s
record should be corrected to show that on 31 August 2001 he elected to add
his spouse to his child only coverage based on full-retired pay. Approval
should be contingent upon the recoupment of all applicable premiums the
applicant would have paid had he made the election at that time.
The evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 June 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been
the victim of an error or injustice. The applicant was unmarried and
elected child only SBP coverage based on full-retired pay prior to his 1
November 1992 retirement. He married on 1 September 2000, but failed to
make an election to add his new spouse to his existing coverage within the
first year of their marriage, as required by law. Although he submitted a
request to change his beneficiary, this request was to change his
beneficiary for his arrears of pay, in the event of his death. The request
did not affect his SBP election. Furthermore, while he contends he
believes this action would change his SBP beneficiary, his request was
submitted more than two years after his marriage. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice; that the application was denied
without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-
01220 in Executive Session on 30 September 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 April 2003, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPTR, dated 9 June 2003.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 June 2003.
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01282
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was unmarried and elected child only SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 October 1992 retirement date. Records reflect the applicant and N--- married on 13 April 1993, but he failed to elect SBP coverage for her within the first year following their marriage. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02546
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was unaware of the time constraint of one year from the date of his marriage to select an SBP for his wife. The applicant and his spouse married on 31 May 1997; however, he failed to request SBP coverage for her within the first year of their marriage. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01599
It would be contrary to the letter and intent of the law, as well as inequitable, to grant this applicant an additional opportunity not afforded to other members similarly situated. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03271
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03271 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former husband's records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and any SBP premium payments due be waived. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01773
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states a servicemember, who is unmarried at retirement and later marries may elect coverage for a newly acquired spouse, as long as the election is made before the first anniversary of the marriage. Although the member contends he submitted a request to change his beneficiary, the request was submitted after the one-year period provided by law. We took notice of the applicant’s complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01398
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR indicates that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) was established by Public Law (PL) 92-425 on 21 September 1972, authorizing a one-year open enrollment period for servicemembers to elect coverage. However, if the Board recommends granting the request, the servicemember’s record should be corrected to show the servicemember elected SBP spouse only coverage based on full retired pay effective 21...
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Air Force stated that the applicant elected child only SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 Mar 73 retirement. They stated that a member who fails to provide SBP coverage for an eligible spouse at the time of retirement may not later elect coverage for that person, or another person of the same category, unless Congress authorizes an open enrollment. ...
At that time, RCSBP coverage and premiums were suspended. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states that SBP spouse coverage is suspended when the spouse loses eligibility. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...
The member and his current spouse married on 17 February 1996, but he failed to advise the finance center that he did not want to extend SBP coverage to his new wife before the first anniversary of their marriage (17 February 1997). A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 March...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01833
On 7 Jun 02, it was requested that the member provide a completed DD Form 2656-1, SBP Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will...