RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01311
INDEX CODE: 111.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Education Training Report (AF Form 475), rendered for the period 6
April 2000 through 15 December 2000, be corrected by removing the
statement in Section III, Other Comments, “CPT Friedman needs to work
on NCO/officer relationships.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The comment is not a fair or truthful characterization of his ability
to work with NCOs. During his entire training period, he was never
given any negative written or verbal feedback.
In support of his request, applicant submits a personal statement and
letters of support from former classmates and an NCO co-worker. The
applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is
1 June 1995. He is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
captain, with an effective date and date of rank of 31 May 1999.
Applicant's OPR profile, commencing with the report closing 31 May 96,
follows:
Period Ending Evaluation
31 May 96 Meets Standards (MS) - 2LT
31 May 97 MS - 1LT
31 May 98 MS
31 May 99 MS - CAPT
5 Apr 00 Education/Training Report (TR)
* 15 Dec 00 TR
18 Jun 02 TR
* Contested Education/Training Report (TR)
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPE recommends the application be denied. DPPPE states that
the unsigned memos of support state that they have seen the applicant
interact with NCOs and never once exhibit unprofessional behavior.
However, the rater on the Training Report (TR) felt the applicant did
not interact with NCOs well and felt strongly enough on the issue to
mention it on the report. In accordance with Air Force policy, an
evaluation report is accurate as written when it becomes a matter of
record. The applicant did not provide any documentation (signed or
unsigned) that proved the statement on the report was not accurate.
The HQ AFPC/DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
4 June 2003 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and applicant’s submission, including the
statements of support, we are unpersuaded that the contested report
should be altered. No evidence has been presented showing that the
evaluator was unable to render a fair assessment of the applicant’s
behavior at that point in time. We have reviewed the statements of
support and do not find these unsigned statements provide an adequate
basis to recommend approval of the requested relief. Although both
the applicant and the class leader were counseled concerning the NCO
incident, we note that the evaluator only commented on the applicant’s
need for improving NCO/officer relationships. Absent is a statement
from the evaluator explaining why he felt it was important for this
comment to be on the applicant’s TR. Additionally, we found no
evidence that the contested report was prepared contrary to the
governing instruction. In view of the foregoing, we believe the
contested TR should stand as written. Therefore, applicant’s request
to have the contested report amended is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 31 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Panel Chair
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with
AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-01311.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Mar 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPE, dated 2 Jun 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Jun 03.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Acting Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03357
The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 February 2004, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. The applicant contends the contested EPR is unjust, she was given an initial feedback but never received a midterm, and she had no indication of substandard performance. We note she received promotion Below-the-Zone during...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03752
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03752 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AF Form 475, Education/Training Report (TR), dated 25 Jun 99, accomplished on him after his attendance to Squadron Officer School (SOS) be included in his officer selection record (OSR) reviewed...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01791
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPE states the applicant has not provided any evidence as to what actions he took to inform his senior rater of a possible violation of the AFI. The applicant has not provided any documentation from his senior rater or from the management level review board president (MRLB) in support of his request for special selection board consideration, nor has he provided a new PRF for consideration by...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01225
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The lack of inclusion of the Letter of Evaluation (LOE) in his Officer Selection Record (OSR) could have had a negative impact on the scoring of his records. The DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied on the basis of timeliness. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03874
The signature date of 28 July 2003 on his AF Form 475 (Education/Training Report), closing 28 March 2003, be changed to an earlier date so that it may be accepted for filing for the CY03A (8 July 2003) (P0503A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB). He was wronged by the excessive period of time it took to complete and file his final Training Report (TR) in his Officer Selection Record (OSR); as well as the time it took to update his current duty history after he arrived at the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01731
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01731 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 27 March 2001, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) P0401A and any associated memoranda regarding the referral period be removed from his records and his corrected record be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01526
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01526 INDEX CODE: 134.02, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Air Force Form 475, Training Report, dated 13 September 2001, be voided, a new Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be accomplished and he receive consideration for promotion by the CY02B Major Central Selection Board,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03654
This information was on his Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 28 September 2000, which met the CY00A selection board. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO states they reviewed the findings in the HQ AFPC/DPPPE advisory and have nothing further to add. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03250
On 21 Jun 93, the applicant’s squadron commander notified her that he was considering whether to vacate the suspended punishment imposed on 15 Mar 93 for the alleged offenses of dereliction of duty and failure to obey a lawful general regulation. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLSA/JAJM recommends denial of the applicant’s requests. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02040
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends he did not receive his OSB in time to review it prior to the promotion board. A complete copy of applicant’s response, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPE asserts the applicant has not provided any...