RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01262
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “2X” to a favorable
code that will allow his reentry into the Armed Forces.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Since he received an honorable discharge and was awarded the Air Force Good
Conduct Medal (AFGCM), he should be eligible for reenlistment.
The applicant states that although he received an Article 15 for late
payment of his Deferred Payment Plan, the punishment as pertained to his
reduction in grade was suspended, and he had no other administrative
punishments. At the time, he had an approved Career Job Reservation (CJR);
however, after receiving the Article 15, it was taken away.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits his personal statement,
copies of his Enlisted Performance Report (EPRs) and performance feedback
worksheets.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 August 1994, for a
period of four years in the grade of airman first class (E-3). He was
progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman (E-4).
On 20 November 1997, his supervisor did not recommend him for reenlistment
under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). His supervisor indicated
that for the last year, the applicant had continuously failed to meet Air
Force standards as indicated by the following:
a. A December 1996 letter of notice of impending involuntary
collection action due to a 60-days delinquent DPP account.
b. Letters of Counseling (LOC), dated 20 March 1997, 13 and 28 May
1997, 23 July 1997, and 25 September 1997, for speeding on base, reporting
45 minutes late for work, failure to obey technical data while repairing an
AIM-9 missile, missing a scheduled training appointment, and again
reporting late for work by 10 minutes.
c. A Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 2 October 1997, for sexually
harassing a dependent daughter of another military member, resulting in the
established of an Unfavorable Information File (UIF) and placement on the
Control Roster.
d. An Article 15 imposed on 17 November 1997, for failure to pay a
debt, for again being notified of involuntary collection action due to a 60-
day delinquent DPP account, for which his punishment was a suspended
reduction to the grade of airman first class.
On 3 December 1997, the commander did not select him for reenlistment under
the SRP.
He was honorably discharged on 23 August 1998, under the provisions of AFI
36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service) and issued an RE Code of 2X
(First term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for
reenlistment under the SRP). He completed four years of active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
the RE code of “2X” is correct. It identifies the fact that at the time of
his discharge he was considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
SRP.
The AFPC/DPPA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 3 July 2003 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The applicant has provided no evidence
showing that his assigned RE code is in error or contrary to the prevailing
instruction. It is clear that the decision to separate the applicant was
proper based on his situation at the time. The RE code which was issued at
the time of his discharge accurately reflects the circumstances of his
separation, i.e., considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
SRP. Accordingly, we do not find this code to be in error or unjust. We
therefore conclude that no basis exists upon which to recommend favorable
action on his request that it be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-01262
in Executive Session on 23 September 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. John L. Robuck, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
Mr. Jay H. Jordon, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Mar 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 27 Jun 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jul 03.
JOHN L. ROBUCK
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02558
The evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 10 January 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice warranting a change in the applicant’s RE code. The Board believes that responsible officials...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01027
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01027 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed to allow reenlistment. Prior to 16 October 1998, his denial of reenlistment,...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03605 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP) be changed. Applicant’s record does not contain a discharge case file or the commander’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00382
On 11 January 1989, his supervisor did not recommend him for reenlistment. Applicant’s performance profile follows: PERIOD ENDING EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 14 Apr 87 8 1 Dec 87 7 1 Dec 88 7 _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not provided any additional information to indicate that his RE code was erroneously or unfairly assessed to his file. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02616
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02616 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment codes be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states they believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-02219
Applicant’s military personnel records reveal that, on 8 March 1997, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (completion of active required service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR states the applicant’s service dates and date of rank to the grade of E-4 are correct. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02326
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02326 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow enlistment in the Air Force Reserves. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She completed her active duty service...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02857
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02857 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment code (RE) be changed to allow her to join the Air Force Reserve. The applicant’s commander notified her on 6 July 1989, that he was not recommending her for promotion because she received an Article...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00931
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00931 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 September 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry Code (RE) of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)),...