The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02476 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 01-02476 in Executive Session on 25 Apr 02, under the provisions of...
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit C. On 20 May 2002, the applicant submitted a VA rating and a copy of his performance report and requested reconsideration. While the performance report does not provide conclusive evidence that would normally be required in support of this type of appeal, we are persuaded that it does provide plausible evidence that supports his...
His Traffic Management Office (TMO) told him to have his orders reflect that he could purchase his own airline ticket and then he could purchase a ticket. His claim for reimbursement for the airline ticket was denied because it had not been procured through a government contracted commercial travel office (CTO). OLGA M. CRERAR Panel Chair AFBCMR 01-02480 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPSAMP recommends the application be denied. With regards to inserting applicant’s personal statement in his Master Personnel Records (MPR), we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the appropriate Air Force office, HQ...
On 19 May 1979, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve and the Air National Guard. He was discharged from the Air National Guard in July 1980 but continued to serve as a member of the Air Force Reserve. He believes with all his years of service his discharge should be upgraded to honorable.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02510 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His erroneous enlistment be removed from his records and he be allowed to reenlist in the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP states that under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C), Section 12731, a retired reserve member is eligible for retired pay upon completion of at least 20 years of satisfactory service with the last 6 years of qualifying service in a Reserve component. Under 10 U.S.C, Section 12371a, a reserve member may be eligible for retired pay based on physical disqualification, providing...
A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened on 7 December 2000, and recommended the applicant be referred to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) based on the diagnosis of dysthymic disorder and borderline personality disorder. The BCMR Medical Consultant states, in part, that the applicant’s concern that a possible personality disorder diagnosis was instrumental in the final determination of her impairment is not borne out by the evidence of record. The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at...
In view of the reasons listed, he contends that the SGLI was improperly started and that the associated bill should be removed from his record. Exhibit D. Letter from Applicant, dated 25 Nov 01. JOSEPH G. DIAMOND Panel Chair AFBCMR 01-02519 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 01-02528 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He and his crew be awarded an unspecified decoration for destroying enemy jet fighters during a bombing mission from Italy to Berlin, Germany, on 24 Mar 45. On 12 Apr 96, a Congressional representative requested that the applicant and...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02530 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that she may join the Army Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded and...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant on 15 November 2001 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
By letter, dated 19 Nov 01, AFPC/DPPPOC notified the applicant that, in response to his 29 Aug 01 application for correction of his military records, they were granting his request for SSB consideration which will consider his record for the CY98A (9 Nov 98), CY99A (8 Nov 99), and CY00A (6 Nov 00) Central Colonel Selection Boards, to include a correction to his 9 Jan 98 duty history entry and missing AFCM (1OLC) on his OSB for those boards. A complete copy of the DPPPO evaluation is at...
A review of the applicant’s case file does not correlate that a severe or grave medical condition existed during his periods of active service, which would have precluded him from completing his military duties as a Reservist. There was nothing wrong with his leg before the injury and he has had nothing but problems since the injury. Although the applicant sustained an injury of his left leg while on active duty orders, we note that it was approximately eight years after the injury and...
His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) for both boards reflected a duty title of senior Protestant chaplain and had overall recommendations of "Promote." A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends that no error was made with the OPRs or his records but rather with the assignment system which did not give him the opportunity to be placed in a...
_______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. _______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air...
He is respectfully asking the Board to review his service records, and schedule an appointment for him to appear before the Air Force Board of Military Record Corrections. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the opinion and stated that he protests the finding of HQ AFPC/DPPRS, to recommend denial of his application to the AFBCMR. He protests...
On 6 Feb 58, the commander recommended the applicant be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-22 (Conviction by Civil Court) with an undesirable discharge. Considering that the discharge occurred over 43 years ago and the type of offense committed by the applicant, the appropriate office of the Air Force has indicated that they would recommend clemency if a check of the FBI files proves negative. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Nov 01.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02556 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Selection Briefs (OSB) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Years (CY) 1996C (CY96C), 1997C (CY97C), 1998B (CY98B), 1999A (CY99A), 1999B (CY99B), and 2000A (CY00A) Central Lieutenant Colonel Boards, be corrected to...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and recommended denial. 3.Insufficient relevant evidence has...
There is no evidence the decoration was submitted before the date of selections for cycle 00E7. The AFPC/DPPPWB evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP states, in part, that if the Board determines the applicant should be promoted to the grade of master sergeant effective 1 October 2000, they will correct his records to reflect that he held the grade of master sergeant on his last day of active duty and was retired in the grade of master sergeant effective 1 January 2001....
AFBCMR 01-02560 INDEX CODE: 135.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02572 INDEX CODE: 100.03 HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed so that he may reenlist. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02576 INDEX NUMBER: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general under honorable conditions discharge. At that time, the applicant was also invited to provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit F). We...
Other relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended denial. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, we believe it is reasonable to assume that the applicant did perform service in direct support of...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 12 May 1967 for a period of four years as an airman basic. The applicant was found guilty of the lesser charge of negligent homicide (Article 134, UCMJ) and driving while drunk and causing a motor vehicle accident and injuring others. The applicant alleges that his attorney was court appointed, but in fact the applicant requested that XXXXX.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02618 INDEX CODE: 108.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Honorary Retired Reserve status be changed to a disability retirement and his records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal. From this assessment, the Medical Consultant states that it would appear that the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02635 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility status reflected on his NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be changed to reflect eligible, vice ineligible. ...
DPPD states that his contention that he was never properly informed of the reason for his discharge is contradicted in a letter from his unit commander, which clearly reflects his proposed action for an administrative discharge. The Medical Consultant Evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded and states that there is no limit as to when a veteran can file a medical claim. In...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02664 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be upgraded to allow him the opportunity to reenlist into the military. The applicant states that the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) has upgraded his discharge; however, they were unable to upgrade his RE...
The applicant’s request for the PH was staffed through the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB). Although the applicant suffered injuries, there is no indication that he received treatment by medical personnel, or that his injuries were received as a direct result of enemy action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was...
Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AFBCMR 01-02765 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Special Review Board and adopt that recommendation as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicant’s records should be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff. Members of the Board,...
They state that the law controlling the SBP allows a retired member to convert from spouse to former spouse coverage within one year following divorce. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit B.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter of character reference from his pastor and deacon board; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States and his Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing record. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. He also states that when he was discharged, he was told that in six months his discharge would be upgraded.
The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied. The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 15 February 2002, for review and response. Whereas, the Air Force rates a member's disability at the time of separation.
He is rated 50 percent service connected and his record should be corrected accordingly. In a legal review of the discharge case file, the staff judge advocate found it legally sufficient and recommended that the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with an honorable discharge. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C, D...
They stated that Public Law (PL) 92-425, which established the SBP, required the spouse to be notified when a member, who retired on or after 21 Sep 72, declined or elected less than maximum coverage. However, both requirements applied only to the spouse married to the member at the time of retirement. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application AFBCMR Docket Number 01-02858 in Executive Session on 23...
The applicant states that nowhere in her request for discharge in lieu of trial does she admit any guilt, but instead asked only that she be granted a discharge because she wanted to be able to leave the service so she could take care of her seven year old daughter and not have to worry about the possibility of her receiving jail time. It is not an error or injustice to let the applicant pay the unfortunate price of her UOTHC discharge where she has, at her own request, received the benefit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02870 INDEX CODE: 107.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he served in Saudi Arabia and is entitled to wear the Southwest Asia (SW) Ribbon. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP2...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02870 INDEX CODE: 107.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he served in Saudi Arabia and is entitled to wear the Southwest Asia (SW) Ribbon. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP2...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW reviewed this application and recommended denial. ...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE states the RE code he received of "2Y" is correct and this code indicates the applicant was a second term or career airman who was denied an appointment to noncommissioned officer (NCO) status, or his NCO status was vacated. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02878 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general discharge and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be upgraded to allow her to continue her military service until she is ready to retire. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the RE...