RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02558
INDEX CODE: 100.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The wording of a medical record entry be changed and his discharge
be changed to “medical” instead of “unclassified” for “erroneous
enlistment.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters
prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C
and D.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and
recommended denial. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached
at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPD also reviewed this application and recommended denial. A
complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and provided a two-
page response which is attached at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3.Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of
the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission
of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 14 February 2002, under the provisions of Air
Force Instruction 36-2603:
Mr. Roger E. Willmeth, Panel Chair
Ms. Nancy Wells Drury, Member
Mr. Albert J. Starnes, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Sep 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated
2 Oct 01
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 5 Nov 01.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Nov 01.
Exhibit F. Letter fr applicant, dated 26 Nov 01.
ROGER E. WILLMETH
Panel Chair
Exhibit B. Exhibit I. Exhibit J.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00344 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated in an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) position retroactive to 24 July 1998, with back pay and allowances, and processed through the Air Force Disability Evaluation System (DES). The LOD form should be taken to the nearest active duty treatment facility so that a new Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) can...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02419
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C, D and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. 3.Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Oct 01.
_______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. _______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01515
On 19 Dec 00, the Secretary of the Air Force directed that the applicant be separated from active service for Physical Disability with severance pay. Thus, there is no evidence provided that his condition of excessive sun sensitivity has actually improved. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 15 Nov 02 for...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and recommended denial. ...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR states there is no evidence in the applicant's record to substantiate that the injury he received was a direct result of enemy action. Based on the information provided, DPPPR recommends denying the applicant's request. We noted the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of his case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their...
` RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01235 INDEX CODE 108.01 108.02 xxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: None xxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: No APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her medical records and fainting episodes be evaluated by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) as if she were still on active duty. A copy of the complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Chief, Aerospace Medicine Division, HQ AFRC/SGP, also reviewed the case and indicates...
A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened on 7 December 2000, and recommended the applicant be referred to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) based on the diagnosis of dysthymic disorder and borderline personality disorder. The BCMR Medical Consultant states, in part, that the applicant’s concern that a possible personality disorder diagnosis was instrumental in the final determination of her impairment is not borne out by the evidence of record. The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at...