RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02544
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His discharge be set aside and he be awarded a disability retirement.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust
and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the
appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and recommended
denial. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPD reviewed this application and recommended denial. A complete
copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and provided a three-page
response, which is attached at Exhibit F.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force
offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket No. 01-03562 in
Executive Session on 26 March 2002, under the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603:
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Panel Chair
Mr. Billy C. Baxter, Member
Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Aug 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated
11 Jan 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 6 Feb 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Feb 02.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Feb 02.
Philip Sheuerman
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02510 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His erroneous enlistment be removed from his records and he be allowed to reenlist in the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02618 INDEX CODE: 108.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Honorary Retired Reserve status be changed to a disability retirement and his records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal. From this assessment, the Medical Consultant states that it would appear that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03742
On 1 March 2001, an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) determined he was unfit and recommended his placement on TDRL status with 30% disability. The DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant summarized the information contained in the applicant’s personnel and medical records and is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted. We are not persuaded by the evidence presented that the applicant’s discharge from the Air Force because of physical...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the deceased member’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03258
On 7 Oct 96, officials within the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force directed that he be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 100 percent disability rating. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant's request. The time spent on the TDRL is not considered active duty service and therefore, is not recorded on the DD Form 214.
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
On 9 April 1999, an IPEB convened and based on the diagnosis of asthma, mild, persistent, recommended the applicant be discharged with severance pay, with a 10% disability rating. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends the applicant be allowed to apply for active duty through an Air Force Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS), where he can be reexamined within military channels to determine if he can meet current medical standards for active...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03445 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. On 28 Sep 54, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the member’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. After thoroughly...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and recommended denial. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00018
On 11 September 1984, the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted and the application should be denied. He had served with some distinction while performing his radar-related duties, and only after his elective cross-training and loss of the SRB did his...