RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02572
INDEX CODE: 100.03
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed so that he may
reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was never made aware of his inability to reenlist and discovered this
only until he arrived at his appointment to enlist in the AFR.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 9
March 1992. He was progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman.
The following is a resume of his Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings,
commencing with the report closing 15 July 1994, rendered on the applicant
in the grade of airman first class.
PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION
15 July 1994 4
16 July 1995 3
*13 November 1995 3
13 November 1996 4
*02 September 1997 3
*Denotes referral report
Applicant was discharged on 25 January 1999, after serving 6 years, 10
months, and 16 days on active duty. An RE code of 2X (First term airman
considered but not selected under SRP).
In a letter dated 18 December 2001, AFPC/DPPRSP advised applicant that an
error to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, Item 26 had been identified and was corrected. A corrected copy
showing SPD correction to KCF (to attend school) was sent to the applicant.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommended the application be granted. DPPRS stated that in
order to correct an injustice the separation code should be changed from
KDF (pregnancy and childbirth) to KCF (to attend school). DPPRS deferred
the reenlistment code issue to DPPAE.
The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. DPPAE states that the
applicant received two referral EPRs in Nov 95 and Sep 97 which would
justify denial of reenlistment based on his performance. However, DPPAE
states that they could not find documentation such as an AF Form 418,
Selective Reenlistment Consideration, officially denying him reenlistment.
The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 15
March 2002 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 12 June 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Panel Chair
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
Mr. James E. Short, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Sep 01.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRSP, dated 20 Dec 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 28 Feb 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Mar 02.
DAVID W. MULGREW
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03560
The applicant was not recommended for reenlistment under the SRP and received an RE code of 2X. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Feb 03 for review and comment within 30 days. Although the applicant’s records lack documentation of the specific reasons that he was denied reenlistment, we believe that...
Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs; Letter, dated 2 Oct 98; Statement BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00035 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02924 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 January...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-04028 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 4E to 1J. We agree with the opinion of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the RE code which was assigned at the time of his separation accurately reflects the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02857
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02857 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment code (RE) be changed to allow her to join the Air Force Reserve. The applicant’s commander notified her on 6 July 1989, that he was not recommending her for promotion because she received an Article...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01902
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge separation and reenlistment code should be changed. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02967 INDEX CODE: 100 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to a favorable code. Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in her military personnel record. Therefore, we have no basis on which to make any changes...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00055 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may reenlist in the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the...