RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02877
INDEX CODE: 110.00
APPLICANT COUNSEL: None
SSN HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive an explanation or clarification of the reenlistment
eligibility (RE) code (2Y) in order to complete the requirements for
him to enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE states the RE code he received of "2Y" is correct and this
code indicates the applicant was a second term or career airman who
was denied an appointment to noncommissioned officer (NCO) status, or
his NCO status was vacated. DPPAE recommends the requested relief be
denied (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 9 July 2002, for review and response. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. Apparently it appears that the
RE code the applicant received was appropriate. In this respect we
note that the applicant's commander denied him NCO status because he
was not making satisfactory progress on the Weight Management Program
(WMP). His presence in Phase I of the WMP rendered him ineligible for
appointment to NCO status and subsequently he was ineligible to
reenlist. While the, applicant’s contentions are duly noted, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 01-
02877 in Executive Session on September 4, 2002, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Member
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Oct 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 2 Jul 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jul 02.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00368 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may enter the Air Force Reserve. We are not persuaded by the evidence provided that the assigned RE code is in error or unjust or that an upgrade of the RE code is warranted...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04001
However, prior to his promotion to the grade of senior airman (E- 4), there was a change in command and he failed Air Force weight standards and his promotion was withheld. After thoroughly reviewing the available evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice. Furthermore, RE code 4J is a code that can be waived for prior service enlistment consideration, provided applicant meets all other requirements for enlistment under an...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01211
The initial DD Form 214 issued in conjunction with the applicant’s 15 Jul 91 separation reflected the narrative reason for separation as “Return from overseas within 30 days of expiration term of service,” with separation code “K14,” and RE Code 4D (Grade is senior airman and member has completed at least nine years of total active service and had not yet been selected for staff sergeant). At the time a member is separated from the Air Force, he/she is furnished an RE code predicated upon...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01749 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01749
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01749 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02411 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. Should the Board decide to grant relief to the applicant, his RE code should be changed to 3K (Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03621 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading his RE Code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00942
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 00942 INDEX CODE: 100.06; 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2Y” be changed so that she can reenter the military as an officer. At this time SrA XXXXXXXX is not qualified to assume greater...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03638 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation be changed on her DD Form 214 and her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her the opportunity to reenter the Air Force. In this respect, it appears that the narrative...
Applicant received an RE code of “2Y.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Management Specialist, Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and states that this case has been reviewed for separation processing and there are no errors or irregularities causing an injustice to the applicant. However if the decision is to grant the relief sought, applicant’s record should be corrected to reflect his...