Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Mr. William E. Edwards, and Ms. Brenda L. Romine considered this application on November 30, 2000. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ ARPC/DPB, dtd Nov 6, 2000, W/Atch AFBCMR 00-02651 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under...
BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, dtd 31 Oct 00, with attachment AFBCMR 00-02664 INDEX CODE: 111.02 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AFBCMR 00-02697 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AFBCMR 00-02707 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AFBCMR 00-02714 INDEX NUMBER: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Members of the Board, Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, and Mrs. Margaret A. Zook, considered this application on 22 November 2000. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 3 Nov 00, w/atchs AFBCMR 00-02719 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AFBCMR 00-02750 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AFBCMR 00-02753 INDEX NUMBER: 135.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AFBCMR 00-02787 INDEX CODE: 131.01 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AFBCMR 00-02798 INDEX NUMBER: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR 00-02806 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AFBCMR 00-02847 INDEX CODE: 131.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
Members of the Board Mr. Teddy L. Houston, Mr. Laurence M. Groner, and Ms. Diana Arnold considered this application on 6 Dec 00. TEDDY L. HOUSTON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRCC, dtd 15 Nov 00, w/Atch AFBCMR 00-02900 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
Members of the Board Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Mr. William E. Edwards, and Ms. Brenda L. Romine considered this application on November 30, 2000. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ ARPC/DPP, dtd Nov 29, 2000, W/Atchs AFBCMR 00-02917 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AFBCMR 00-02928 INDEX NUMBER: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be...
AFBCMR 00-02947 INDEX NUMBER: 113.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Mr. Daniel F. Wenker, and Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, considered this application on 13 December 2000. Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/DPB, 21 Nov 99, w/atchs AFBCMR 00-02962 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the...
It appears that the applicant elected to enlist for a period of six years primarily on the presumption that he would receive an increased enlistment bonus after successful completion of F-16 Avionics Systems Apprentice technical training. We note that he has received a benefit associated with his six-year enlistment in the form of advanced promotion to the grade of E-3. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-02944 INDEX CODE: 108.01 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reason for separation, personality disorder, be removed from her record and her records reflect her mother as the next of kin. However, since the Report of Separation reflects information furnished by the member at the...
Discharge action was initiated in the applicant’s case due to her failure to meet military obligations by not completing her dependent care certification. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the that the application will only be reconsidered...
Exhibit J. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MIB SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN, AFBCMR Docket Number 91-00800 I have carefully considered all aspects of this case and do not agree with the majority of the panel that the applicant’s request should be denied. In recognition of the applicant’s post-service efforts, I agree with the minority member of the panel and direct that his UOTHC discharge...
Exhibit J. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MIB SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN, AFBCMR Docket Number 91-00800 I have carefully considered all aspects of this case and do not agree with the majority of the panel that the applicant’s request should be denied. In recognition of the applicant’s post-service efforts, I agree with the minority member of the panel and direct that his UOTHC discharge...
On 24 Jan 1992, applicant was advised of the Board’s decision (see Exhibit F). Considered alone, the Board concludes the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 14 Sep 88, he was discharged with service...
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be considered for promotion to the grade of Colonel, Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board; and, that his records be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by the Fiscal Years 1996 and 97 Reserve of the Air Force Colonel Selection Boards. Electronic Mailgram,...
A summary of the evidence considered by the Board and the rationale for it’s decision is set forth in the Second Addendum to Record of Proceedings at Exhibit D. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Significant new evidence provided by the two former Numbered Air Force Commanders provides strong support for his request to add the indorsement of General K---- to the June 1986 OER and the indorsement of General R---- to the May 1987 OER. In preparing the applicant’s 2 Jun 86 Officer Effectiveness...
However, he has provided copies of the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) proceedings. A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 July 2000, for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). Although the PEB, conducted on 29 August 1994, considered...
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF THE CASE: On 16 Nov 94, the Board considered and denied an application for correction of military records pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit C (with Exhibit A). Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s undesirable discharge be upgraded to general.
Ltr, AFBCMR, dtd Aug 10, 00 4. Ltr, applicant, dtd Nov 2, 00, w/atchs AFBCMR 95-02481 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 95-03402 INDEX CODE: 134.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Air Training Command (ATC) Form 126A, Record of Commander’s Review Action, dated 2 September 1993, reflecting his self-initiated elimination (SIE) from the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) T- 41 Pilot...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In a letter from the counsel, dated 8 June 2000, additional documentation is submitted in support of the applicant. Counsel requests that the case be reconsidered. His case was properly evaluated, appropriately rated and received full consideration under the provisions of AFI 36-3212.
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF THE CASE: On 9 Oct 97, the Board considered and denied an application for correction of military records pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that his RE code of 2Q be changed to allow him to enter the Air National Guard. MARTHA MAUST Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS SUBJECT: AFBCMR Case of , , Docket Number 96-00677 I have carefully...
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 23 Jan 97, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request (see Exhibit F). We have reviewed the entire application and the additional documentation submitted. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.
The Board found sufficient evidence of probable error or injustice to warrant permanently retiring the applicant by reason of physical disability effective 1 July 1977, with a 40% disability rating. However, based on the additional documentation submitted by the applicant’s counsel (e.g., DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty) applicant retired for length of service on 1 December 1977, rather than 1 July 1977. BARBARA A. WESTGATE Vice Chair AFBCMR 96-01266 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...
He indicates that the Air Force’s promotion recommendation and promotion board systems operated illegally. Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: In an application, dated 30 Jul 96, the applicant requested that his record, to include a Letter of Mitigation attached to the OPR closing 22 Aug 88 and a narrative only PRF, be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special...
In an application, dated 5 August 1996, the applicant requested promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, correction of the OSB for the CY93A Lt Col Board to reflect additional awards and an additional duty title, that the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 12 August 1993, be removed from his records and substituted with a reaccomplished report; consideration for promotion by Special Selection Board (SSB) if retroactive promotion was denied; set aside of his nonselections for...
The Board’s recommendation was approved by the Director, Air Force Review Board’s Agency on 4 May 98 A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit E (with Exhibits A through D). Now it is up to the Board to do what is right. Therefore, in the absence of clear-cut evidence indicating that the applicant was not afforded full and fair consideration for promotion to the grade of colonel by a duly constituted SSB, or that he was treated differently than other similarly situated...
It was never referred to him nor were its contents made known to him until after it was a matter of record. However, they recommend the report be corrected by transferring its content to an AF Form 707B. Regarding applicant’s contention that he was never given a copy of the report, we note that, unless it is a referral report, the ratee will not be shown the prepared Air Force forms until the report is filed in the UPRG.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 7 Aug 97, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request (see Exhibit F). On 26 Nov 99, counsel for the applicant provided additional documentation and requested the Board reconsider applicant’s request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-00559, Case 3 COUNSEL: STEVEN A. CHILIAN HEARING DESIRED: YES RESUME OF CASE: On 23 April 1998, the Board considered applicant’s request that the Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) closing 31 May 1992 and 31 May 1993 be removed from his records and he be promoted to the grade of major. However, this statement only indicates that, “…the IG complaint could have been viewed...
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On , the Board considered and denied applicant’s request (Exhibit F). On , the applicant provided a five-page statement, with attachments, and requests the Board reconsider his application (see Exhibit G). DPPPR believes the applicant received the appropriate decoration for his accomplishments and recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request for upgrade of his AFAM with 2OLC to the AFCM with 1OLC.
The rater did not provide a formal performance feedback. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 19 July 1999 for review and response within 30 days. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 17 Sep 98, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request (see Exhibit F). _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant again reviewed this application and indicated that the testimonial letters written by two medical practitioners in Aug 98 and an unknown date simply reiterate the deterioration of the applicant’s medical...
As a result of the CG’s decision, the AFBCMR advised the applicant by letter dated 23 Jan 98 that, since the Board lacked the authority to approve claims that were filed more than six years after the death of the service member, her case was being returned and administratively closed (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Prior to the Pride v. US ruling, the Chief, Retiree Services Branch, AFPC/DPPTR, had provided the following...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9701857A1
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-01857 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the CY97C Lieutenant Colonel Board, which convened on 21 Jul 97, be replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. ...
On August 11, 1998, the Board again considered and denied the applicant’s appeal, in which he requested that his records be corrected to reflect the addition of the Fifth Oak Leaf Cluster to the Air Medal and Distinguished Flying Cross, and award of the China War Memorial Medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Awards and Decorations Section, AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed the applicant’s most recent...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge on 27 Jun 97. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and has not been rebutted by applicant.
The applicant was medically disqualified following a period of 180 days from the date he was placed on DNIF status and his entitlement to ACIP was terminated effective 17 April 1994. (Exhibit D) ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant accepted the recommended re-entitlement date of 8 August 1994 for his ACIP. Given that his waiver expired 31 March 1995, even if a subsequent waiver was not granted, he would...