ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-01139
INDEX CODE: 128.00, 128.14
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS:
Reinstatement for lost time and pay due to administrative error by
management.
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
On 23 Jan 97, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request
(see Exhibit F).
In an application, dated 23 May 00, applicant requested
reconsideration of his application (see Exhibit G).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. We have
reviewed the entire application and the additional documentation
submitted. However, a majority of the Board is unpersuaded that a
revision of the earlier determination in this case is warranted.
In this respect, after reviewing the additional documentation, the
Board majority found no substantial evidence that the applicant has
been the victim of an error or injustice. There is nothing in the
evidence provided to indicate that he requested or was denied a
medical evaluation or that the decision by Air Force authorities
was improper or based on invalid considerations. In view of the
foregoing, the earlier decision to deny applicant’s request is
affirmed.
2. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance, with or without counsel,
will add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore,
the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 28 August 2000, under the provisions of Air
Force Instruction 36-2603:
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Panel Chair
Mr. Robert Zook, Member
Ms. Patricia J. Vestal, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of the
application. Mr. Wheeler voted to grant the relief sought and
submitted a minority report which is attached at Exhibit H.
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 2 Apr 97, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. DD Fm 149, dated 23 May 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Minority Report.
PATRICK R. WHEELER
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 96-01139
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to, be corrected to show that:
a. He was not relieved from assignment at Headquarters
Air Reserve Personnel Center (Non-obligated Non-participating Ready
Personnel Section) Reserve of the Air Force effective 21 March 2000.
b. He was credited with an additional 6 paid active duty
points during the retirement/retention year 20 September 1994 to
19 September 1995, resulting in 50 total points; and, that the period
20 September 1994 through 19 September 1995 is a year of satisfactory
Federal service for retirement.
c. He was credited with 12 paid active duty points, 23
paid inactive duty points, and 15 membership points during the
retirement/retention years ending 19 September 1996, 1997, 1998, and
1999 and that these years are satisfactory Federal service for
retirement.
d. On 21 March 2000, he was relieved from the Air Force
Reserve and transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for
retired pay at age 60.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force
Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-03288
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1994-04097A
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF THE CASE: The applicant is a former Air Force Reserve officer who was assigned to the Retired Reserve in the grade of major, effective 20 Dec 73. A complete copy of the DPJA evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her initial response, the applicant indicated that,...
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF THE CASE: The applicant is a former Air Force Reserve officer who was assigned to the Retired Reserve in the grade of major, effective 20 Dec 73. A complete copy of the DPJA evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her initial response, the applicant indicated that,...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 93-02848 INDEX CODES: 111.01, 131.00 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Effectiveness Reports (OERs) for the periods closing 16 Jul 83 and 16 Jul 85 be declared void and removed from her records. In addition to the aforementioned requests, she is also requesting that she be...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1993-02848A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 93-02848 INDEX CODES: 111.01, 131.00 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Effectiveness Reports (OERs) for the periods closing 16 Jul 83 and 16 Jul 85 be declared void and removed from her records. In addition to the aforementioned requests, she is also requesting that she be...
_________________________________________________________________ OFFICE OF PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY EVALUATION: The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, advises that review of the applicant’s pay records shows he resigned from the Air Force Reserves with an effective date of August 2, 1996. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL EVALUATIONS: The Chief, Retirement Branch, HQ ARPC/DPAR,...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-01936
_________________________________________________________________ OFFICE OF PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY EVALUATION: The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, advises that review of the applicant’s pay records shows he resigned from the Air Force Reserves with an effective date of August 2, 1996. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL EVALUATIONS: The Chief, Retirement Branch, HQ ARPC/DPAR,...
The applicant was discharged as a result of the findings and recommendations of an administrative discharge board. The complete response from the applicant’s counsel is at Exhibit F. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE ADVISORY: The applicant’s counsel also responded to the additional evaluation. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 7 Jan 00.
The pertinent medical facts surrounding the applicant's physical disqualification for worldwide duty and continued service in the Air Force Reserve are contained in the discussion section of the evaluation prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant attached at Exhibit G . In this respect, we note the findings of the BCMR Medical Consultant (Exhibit G) that the applicant was diagnosed with severe cardiac disease when he was evaluated at Wilford Hall Medical He was subsequently found...