Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9100800A
Original file (9100800A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                                 ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  91-00800
                             INDEX CODE:  110.00
      APPLICANT        COUNSEL:  None

      SSN                    HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE

On 20 June 1991, the  Board  considered  applicant’s  9  January  1991
application requesting  his  under  other  than  honorable  conditions
(UOTHC) discharge be upgraded.  A  complete  copy  of  the  Record  of
Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F.

On 17 October 1995, applicant submitted a request for  reconsideration
of his application for correction of his military  records.   After  a
thorough review of the documentation provided  by  the  applicant  his
reconsideration request was denied.  (Exhibit G)

On 28 May  2000,  applicant  submitted  a  DD  149  with  attachments,
requesting his discharge be upgraded.  (Exhibit H)

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of  investigation,
Washington, D.C., indicated on the basis of the  data  furnished  they
were unable to locate an arrest record (Exhibit I).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence   of   probable   error   or   injustice.    After   careful
reconsideration of the applicant’s request, the majority of the  Board
finds no impropriety in the characterization of applicant’s  discharge
on the basis of is overall misconduct.   Applicant’s  contention  that
his post-service conduct warrants clemency is  noted;  however,  post-
service conduct alone is  not  justification  for  an  upgrade;  other
factors are considered such as, the overall quality  of  his  service,
the events which precipitated the discharge,  and  available  evidence
related to post-service activities and accomplishments.   On  balance,
the majority does not believe that clemency is warranted.

_________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:

A majority of the  panel  finds  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 20 September 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

      Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
      Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
      Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member

By a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of  the  application.
Mr. Gracie voted to correct the records and has submitted  a  Minority
Report.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit F. ROP, undated, w/atchs.
      Exhibit G. AFBCMR Ltr, dated 21 February 2000.
      Exhibit H. DD Form 149, dated 28 May 2000, w/atchs.
      Exhibit I. FBI Report, dated 29 August 2000.
      Exhibit J. Minority Report.




                             WAYNE R. GRACIE
                             Panel Chair






MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR
                          CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR)


FROM:  SAF/MIB


SUBJECT:  APPLICANT, SSN, AFBCMR Docket Number 91-00800

      I have carefully considered all aspects of this case and do not
agree with the majority of the panel that the applicant’s request
should be denied.

      In arriving at my decision, I noted that while  the  under  other
than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge may have  been  appropriate
at the time, the applicant has suffered the effects of  this  discharge
for over 15 years.  However, it appears he has overcome the  behavioral
traits which may have led to his undesirable discharge and has become a
productive member of society.

      In recognition of the applicant’s post-service efforts,  I  agree
with the minority member  of  the  panel  and  direct  that  his  UOTHC
discharge be upgraded to general  (under  honorable  conditions)  as  a
matter of clemency.




                             JOE G. LINEBERGER
                             Director
                             Air Force Review Boards Agency





AFBCMR 91-00800



MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the  recommendation  of  the  Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat  116),  it  is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of  the  Department  of  the  Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, SSN, be corrected to show that on 14  May
1985 he was discharged with service characterized  as  general  (under
honorable conditions).




                             JOE G. LINEBERGER
                             Director
                             Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9100800

    Original file (9100800.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Exhibit J. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MIB SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN, AFBCMR Docket Number 91-00800 I have carefully considered all aspects of this case and do not agree with the majority of the panel that the applicant’s request should be denied. In recognition of the applicant’s post-service efforts, I agree with the minority member of the panel and direct that his UOTHC discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0001071A

    Original file (0001071A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. In a letter, dated 20 April 2001, the applicant provided statements from her former rating chain and requests reconsideration of her appeal. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the additional documentation provided by the applicant, the majority of the Board finds sufficient evidence to award her the AFCM. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-01071 INDEX CODE: 107.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1993-02122B

    Original file (BC-1993-02122B.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    An accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale of the original Board’s decision is provided in the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 31 Aug 05, this Board reconsidered and again denied the applicant’s appeal for an honorable discharge and an amended narrative reason, concluding the post-service information he provided was meager and insufficient to overcome his misconduct while in the service and, according to the FBI report,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01143

    Original file (BC-2003-01143.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further acknowledged he understood he could receive a discharge under conditions other than honorable and receive an undesirable discharge that could deprive him of any rights to receive veterans’ benefits in the future. On 30 August 1957, the base and wing commanders recommended approval of the applicant’s discharge with an undesirable discharge. The discharge authority approved the discharge on 9 September 1957 and ordered an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02065

    Original file (BC-2007-02065.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following members of the Board considered the applicant’s request for reconsideration of AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-02065 in Executive Session on 14 January 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 21 Sep 07, w/atchs. Air Force Review Boards Agency

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0001856

    Original file (0001856.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that he is very disappointed in the way AFPC analyzed and commented on the facts. Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-01155

    Original file (BC-2005-01155.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 March 2005, the Air Force Purple Heart Review Board (AFPHRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH. On 13 July 2005, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. On 30 November 2005, the applicant requested reconsideration of his request; however, on 15 December...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC -1991-01786-2

    Original file (BC -1991-01786-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit F. On 1 July 2000, applicant submitted an application requesting reconsideration that his discharge be upgraded. A copy of the AFBCMR letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. On 26 May 2004, applicant submitted an application requesting reconsideration that his discharge be upgraded at least to a general. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-1991-01786-2 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9102978

    Original file (9102978.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 24 Jan 1992, applicant was advised of the Board’s decision (see Exhibit F). Considered alone, the Board concludes the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 14 Sep 88, he was discharged with service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1985-03480B

    Original file (BC-1985-03480B.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1985-03480 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. On 23 February 1985, the applicant submitted an application requesting that his undesirable...