ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 91-00800
INDEX CODE: 110.00
APPLICANT COUNSEL: None
SSN HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE
On 20 June 1991, the Board considered applicant’s 9 January 1991
application requesting his under other than honorable conditions
(UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. A complete copy of the Record of
Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F.
On 17 October 1995, applicant submitted a request for reconsideration
of his application for correction of his military records. After a
thorough review of the documentation provided by the applicant his
reconsideration request was denied. (Exhibit G)
On 28 May 2000, applicant submitted a DD 149 with attachments,
requesting his discharge be upgraded. (Exhibit H)
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of investigation,
Washington, D.C., indicated on the basis of the data furnished they
were unable to locate an arrest record (Exhibit I).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After careful
reconsideration of the applicant’s request, the majority of the Board
finds no impropriety in the characterization of applicant’s discharge
on the basis of is overall misconduct. Applicant’s contention that
his post-service conduct warrants clemency is noted; however, post-
service conduct alone is not justification for an upgrade; other
factors are considered such as, the overall quality of his service,
the events which precipitated the discharge, and available evidence
related to post-service activities and accomplishments. On balance,
the majority does not believe that clemency is warranted.
_________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 20 September 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of the application.
Mr. Gracie voted to correct the records and has submitted a Minority
Report. The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. ROP, undated, w/atchs.
Exhibit G. AFBCMR Ltr, dated 21 February 2000.
Exhibit H. DD Form 149, dated 28 May 2000, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. FBI Report, dated 29 August 2000.
Exhibit J. Minority Report.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR
CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR)
FROM: SAF/MIB
SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN, AFBCMR Docket Number 91-00800
I have carefully considered all aspects of this case and do not
agree with the majority of the panel that the applicant’s request
should be denied.
In arriving at my decision, I noted that while the under other
than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge may have been appropriate
at the time, the applicant has suffered the effects of this discharge
for over 15 years. However, it appears he has overcome the behavioral
traits which may have led to his undesirable discharge and has become a
productive member of society.
In recognition of the applicant’s post-service efforts, I agree
with the minority member of the panel and direct that his UOTHC
discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) as a
matter of clemency.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AFBCMR 91-00800
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, SSN, be corrected to show that on 14 May
1985 he was discharged with service characterized as general (under
honorable conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Exhibit J. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MIB SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN, AFBCMR Docket Number 91-00800 I have carefully considered all aspects of this case and do not agree with the majority of the panel that the applicant’s request should be denied. In recognition of the applicant’s post-service efforts, I agree with the minority member of the panel and direct that his UOTHC discharge...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. In a letter, dated 20 April 2001, the applicant provided statements from her former rating chain and requests reconsideration of her appeal. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the additional documentation provided by the applicant, the majority of the Board finds sufficient evidence to award her the AFCM. WAYNE R. GRACIE Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-01071 INDEX CODE: 107.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1993-02122B
An accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale of the original Board’s decision is provided in the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 31 Aug 05, this Board reconsidered and again denied the applicant’s appeal for an honorable discharge and an amended narrative reason, concluding the post-service information he provided was meager and insufficient to overcome his misconduct while in the service and, according to the FBI report,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01143
He further acknowledged he understood he could receive a discharge under conditions other than honorable and receive an undesirable discharge that could deprive him of any rights to receive veterans’ benefits in the future. On 30 August 1957, the base and wing commanders recommended approval of the applicant’s discharge with an undesirable discharge. The discharge authority approved the discharge on 9 September 1957 and ordered an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02065
The following members of the Board considered the applicant’s request for reconsideration of AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-02065 in Executive Session on 14 January 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 21 Sep 07, w/atchs. Air Force Review Boards Agency
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that he is very disappointed in the way AFPC analyzed and commented on the facts. Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-01155
On 4 March 2005, the Air Force Purple Heart Review Board (AFPHRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH. On 13 July 2005, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. On 30 November 2005, the applicant requested reconsideration of his request; however, on 15 December...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC -1991-01786-2
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit F. On 1 July 2000, applicant submitted an application requesting reconsideration that his discharge be upgraded. A copy of the AFBCMR letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. On 26 May 2004, applicant submitted an application requesting reconsideration that his discharge be upgraded at least to a general. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-1991-01786-2 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD...
On 24 Jan 1992, applicant was advised of the Board’s decision (see Exhibit F). Considered alone, the Board concludes the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 14 Sep 88, he was discharged with service...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1985-03480B
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1985-03480 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. On 23 February 1985, the applicant submitted an application requesting that his undesirable...