AFBCMR 95-02481
INDEX CODE: 131.09, 135.02
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT:
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the
recommendations of the Special Review Board and the Air Force and
adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice.
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the
applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying
Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of
the Board or his designee.
Members of the Board Mr Vaughn E. Schlunz, Mr. William E.
Edwards, and Ms. Brenda L. Romine, considered this application on 30
November 2000.
Panel Chair
Attachments:
1. Ltr, ARPC/DPBB, dtd 25 Oct 25, 99
2. Ltr, ARPC/DPP, dtd Jul 20, 00
3. Ltr, AFBCMR, dtd Aug 10, 00
4. Ltr, applicant, dtd Nov 2, 00, w/atchs
AFBCMR 95-02481
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance
with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that:
a. He was not relieved from his Reserve assignment and
assigned to the Retired Reserve Section awaiting pay at age 60 on
3 August 1993, but continued in an active Reserve status for the
convenience of the government.
b. He was promoted to the Reserve grade of lieutenant
colonel, with a promotion effective date and promotion service date of
1 October 1993.
c. He was credited with an additional 10 paid active duty
points and 44 nonpaid inactive duty points during the
retirement/retention year 6 May 1993 through 5 May 1994, resulting in
87 total points; and, that the period 6 May 1993 through 5 May 1994 is
a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
d. He was credited with 18 paid active duty points,
46 nonpaid inactive duty points, and 15 membership points during the
retirement/retention year 6 May 1994 through 5 May 1995, resulting in
79 total points; and, that the period 6 May 1994 through 5 May 1995 is
a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
e. He was credited with 18 paid active duty points,
46 nonpaid inactive duty points, and 15 membership points during the
retirement/retention year 6 May 1995 through 5 May 1996, resulting in
79 total points; and, that the period 6 May 1995 through 5 May 1996 is
a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
f. He was credited with 18 paid active duty points,
46 nonpaid inactive duty points, and 15 membership points during the
retirement/retention year 6 May 1996 through 5 May 1997, resulting in
79 total points; and, that the period 6 May 1996 through 5 May 1997 is
a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
g. He was credited with 18 paid active duty points,
46 nonpaid inactive duty points, and 15 membership points during the
retirement/retention year 6 May 1997 through 5 May 1998, resulting in
79 total points; and, that the period 6 May 1997 through 5 May 1998 is
a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
h. He was credited with 18 paid active duty points,
46 nonpaid inactive duty points, and 15 membership points during the
retirement/retention year 6 May 1998 through 5 May 1999, resulting in
79 total points; and, that the period 6 May 1998 through 5 May 1999 is
a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
i. He was credited with 18 paid active duty points,
46 nonpaid inactive duty points, and 15 membership points during the
retirement/retention year 6 May 1999 through 5 May 2000, resulting in
79 total points; and, that the period 6 May 1999 through 5 May 2000 is
a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement.
j. During the period 6 May 2000 through 4 June 2000, he
was credited with 1 paid active duty point and 4 nonpaid inactive duty
points.
k. Effective 4 June 2000, he was relieved from his
Reserve assignment and assigned to the Retired Reserve Section
awaiting pay at age 60 in the Reserve grade of lieutenant colonel.
DONNA PITTENGER
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
In the opinion of the voting members, the applicant should not have been recommended for promotion by the 1 October 1990 Air Force Reserve Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Board. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. The Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, dated 16 March 1998, awarded the applicant the minimum number of points for satisfactory service for the Retention/Retirement Years ending (RYE) 22 March 1995, 22 March 1996, and 14 June 1996, fExhibit In...
Applicant alleges that records of the wrongful actions supporting the 1994 revocation, and reiterations of the records, still exist. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, to include the findings of the Air Force Personnel Board, we are persuaded that applicant’s security clearance should be reinstated; that all documentation regarding any and all unfavorable actions taken against him regarding the revocation of his security clearance be removed from his records; he be returned...
Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01706 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and"having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: rtment of the Air The pertinen be corrected to Force relating to show that she...
She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03257
She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1999-01513
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-01513 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that the additional nonpaid Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points initially approved by the Board be changed to paid IDT points. The applicant’s complete...
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-03288
Available records reflect that the applicant received a Memorandum of Reprimand, dated 10 June 1994, from the Commander, Headquarters Texas Air National Guard. They recommend the applicant’s records be changed to show constructive participation as a Reserve Officer for the period of time following separation from the Texas Air National Guard through the Mandatory Separation Date. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are persuaded that the...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, ARPC/DPP, reviewed this application and indicated that according to Title 10, USC, Section 12731a, a member who completes at least 15 years of satisfactory service and no longer meets the qualifications for membership in the Selected Reserve solely because the member is unfit because of physical disability is eligible for retirement. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 01-00230 INDEX CODE 135.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with enough satisfactory years of service to be eligible for Reserve retired pay and that his retired pay grade be master sergeant (MSgt). On 15 May 99, the unit commander indicated the applicant’s performance was not...