ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-01266
COUNSEL: JOSEPH W. KASTL
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
On 24 February 1998, the Board considered applicant’s request that the
Officer Effectiveness Report (OER) rendered for the period 1 May 1976
through 30 April 1977 be removed from his records, and he be considered by
Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to the grade of colonel; if
selected for promotion by the SSB, he be reimbursed for back pay and
allowances; and he be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List
(TDRL). The Board found sufficient evidence of probable error or injustice
to warrant permanently retiring the applicant by reason of physical
disability effective 1 July 1977, with a 40% disability rating. However,
the Board found no basis to warrant removing the contested OER and
providing the applicant promotion consideration to the grade of colonel by
an SSB. A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at
Exhibit K.
In an application, dated 26 May 2000, the applicant requested
reconsideration of his appeal and amended his request to include changing
his date of separation (DOS) to 1 December 1977. Applicant’s complete
submission is attached at Exhibit L.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice to warrant permanently retiring
the applicant by reason of physical disability on 1 December 1977. In this
respect, we note that in his original application to the Board, dated 30
April 1996, the applicant indicated that he retired on 1 July 1977. In
addition, the Air Force evaluations prepared in regard to his appeal both
indicated the applicant was retired on 1 July 1977. Based on this
information, the Board assumed the applicant retired on this date.
However, based on the additional documentation submitted by the applicant’s
counsel (e.g., DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty)
applicant retired for length of service on 1 December 1977, rather than 1
July 1977. Had the Board known this at the time of its original decision,
it would have recommended that he be retired by reason of physical
disability on that date. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected
to the extent indicated below.
2. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice regarding the remainder of
applicant’s requests. The statements from the rating officials of the
contested OER are duly noted; however, we are not persuaded the report was
inaccurate when written. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration
of his request to void the contested OER and provide him promotion
consideration to the grade of colonel by an SSB.
3. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially
add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request
for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, AFBCMR 96-01266, issued
on 6 March 1998, as pertains to APPLICANT, be declared void and removed
from his records.
b. On 30 November 1977, the diagnosis in his case was
hemochromotosis, requiring frequent phlebotomy, VA Diagnostic Code 7799-
7704, rated at 40%; that the total combined compensable rating was 40%;
that the disability was permanent; that the disability was not due to
intentional misconduct or willful neglect; that the disability was not
incurred during a period of national emergency; and that the disability was
not received in line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict.
c. He was not retired for length of service effective 1 December
1977, but on that date he was permanently retired by reason of physical
disability with a compensable disability rating of 40%.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 10 October 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Vice Chair
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Member
Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit K. Record of Proceedings, dated 6 Mar 98,
w/atchs.
Exhibit L. DD Form 149, dated 26 May 00, w/atchs.
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Vice Chair
AFBCMR 96-01266
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, AFBCMR 96-01266, issued
on 6 March 1998, as pertains to APPLICANT, be, and hereby is, declared void
and removed from his records.
b. On 30 November 1977, the diagnosis in his case was
hemochromotosis, requiring frequent phlebotomy, VA Diagnostic Code 7799-
7704, rated at 40%; that the total combined compensable rating was 40%;
that the disability was permanent; that the disability was not due to
intentional misconduct or willful neglect; that the disability was not
incurred during a period of national emergency; and that the disability was
not received in line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict.
c. He was not retired for length of service effective 1 December
1977, but on that date he was permanently retired by reason of physical
disability with a compensable disability rating of 40%.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02004
Members of the Board Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, and Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate considered this application on 12 August 2003. BARBARA A. WESTGATE Chair Attachments: 1. Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 18 July 03 AFBCMR BC-2003-02004 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
His corrected record be considered by any Senior Service School (SSS) candidacy/designation/selection boards and by any colonel selection boards that the now voided OER rendered for the period 17 February 1987 through 1 January 1988, was a matter of record. On 15 June 1995, the Board favorably considered applicant’s request that the OER rendered for the period 17 February 1987 through 1 January 1988 be declared void and he be considered for promotion by SSBs for the CY92A, CY93 and CY94 Col...
On 29 Jun 98, the applicant provided additional documentation through his senator and requests the Board reconsider his requests and award him 100% disability retirement from the Air Force and change his DOR to 15 Dec 81 (see Exhibit S). _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, SAF/PC, reviewed applicant’s request and indicated that all evidence of record points to the applicant having been...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1995-02003B
On 29 Jun 98, the applicant provided additional documentation through his senator and requests the Board reconsider his requests and award him 100% disability retirement from the Air Force and change his DOR to 15 Dec 81 (see Exhibit S). _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, SAF/PC, reviewed applicant’s request and indicated that all evidence of record points to the applicant having been...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00385
Anagrelide (Agrylin) is used to decrease the number of platelets (a type of blood cell that is needed to control bleeding) in the blood of patients who have a myeloproliferative disorder (condition in which the body makes too many of one or more types of blood cells) such as Essential Thrombocythemia (also called Essential Thrombocytosis; condition in which the body makes too many platelets) or Polycythemia Vera (condition in which the body makes too many red blood cells and sometimes too...
By letter, dated 2 Nov 96, the applicant was notified that since she had been twice considered and not recommended for promotion, the law required that her active status as an officer in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force be terminated not later than 15 Nov 96. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Promotions Branch,...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02137
By letter, dated 2 Nov 96, the applicant was notified that since she had been twice considered and not recommended for promotion, the law required that her active status as an officer in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force be terminated not later than 15 Nov 96. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Promotions Branch,...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03414 COUNSEL: GEORGE E DAY HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 16 April 1997 to 15 April 1998 be expunged from his records; promotion to Senior Master Sergeant (SMSgt) with a date of rank appropriate to his promotion sequence number in 1998 with...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01266
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There is no error or injustice in his record; however, he is requesting a 20-year retirement letter from the Air Force based on his total active duty time of 17 years, 11 months, and 6 days, his Navy Reserve time, and his Federal government employment with the Air Force so he can receive Concurrent Pay Receipt from the Veterans Administration. The DPPD evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
The applicant has failed to provide any information or support from the rating chain on the contested OER. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that as for clarification, his request is for the removal of an OER rendered on 14 April 1987 not 14 April 1997. The merits of which seek to overturn the one document the Air Force continues to have on file - the...