The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that 15 days of leave were added to his leave account commencing 2 October 1999. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPSFM, dtd 24 Feb 00, with...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-03290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her husband's records be corrected to show she is entitled to a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. After reviewing the evidence of record, the majority of the Board is not persuaded that the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. Exhibit B.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-03306 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00, 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), First Oak Leaf Cluster (1OLC), for the period 14 April 1995-15 August 1998, and that the award be considered in the promotion process for the 99E8 cycle to senior master...
AFBCMR 99-03308 Index Number: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). Members of the Board, Mr. Gerald B. Kauvar, Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, and Mr. Roger E. Willmeth, considered this application on 3 Aug 00 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute,...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Officers to be considered for position vacancy promotion must have a documented record of performance and potential that clearly supports a recommendation for promotion ahead of their contemporaries. Overall, the applicant’s case did not provide supporting documentation that an injustice or error occurred and it incorrectly references authorities within the law that are not applicable. The advisory provided not one shred of documentation to support its claims that he is wrong and should...
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement, copies of his AFI 36-2401 application, the Evaluations Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) decision, a statement from his indorser and additional documents associated with the issues cited in his contentions. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Enlisted Promotion and Military Testing Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, stated that the first time the contested report was considered in...
A copy of the complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s counsel was erroneously advised by SAF/MIBR on 11 Feb 00 that the Air Force was recommending approval. The supporting statements were noted, as was the applicant’s primary contention that a unique wing policy regarding PME recommendations denied him equal protection for promotion purposes. We note the OPR closing 25...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-03334 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE SSN HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-03337 INDEX NUMBER:110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her under other than honorable conditions discharge (UOTHC) be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 23 March 2000, the Air Force Discharge Review Board...
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a response which is attached at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to counsel for review and response (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY2000 | AFBCMR Decision
The DocuShare Administration screens support five administration categories, corresponding to chapters two through six of this manual. Other administrative functions, such as changing a user’s password, are available anywhere in the site when logged into DocuShare using an administrator account. Administrator Tips and Suggestions Additional tips for managing a DocuShare site such as Managing Repository Growth, Backup Suggestions, Rotating Log Files and Object Restoration.
AF | BCMR | CY2000 | BC 2000 00348 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2000-00348 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a General Discharge. RESUME OF CASE: On 9 Aug 00, the Board considered and denied the applicants original request to correct his records. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of...
AF | BCMR | CY2000 | BC-1999-01920
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01920 INDEX NUMBER: 113.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for KC-135 Initial Qualification Training (IQT) of 21 August 2003 be reduced to match his Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) ADSC of 25 January 2003. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2000 | BC-1999-01961
Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Ltr, AFPC/DPPRS, dtd Sep 13, 1999, w/Atchs AFBCMR 99-01961 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: Provided she accepts the offer to return to active duty as a member of the Regular Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2000 | BC-1999-02605
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR 99-02605 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2000 | BC-2000-00704
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was sworn into the United States Army Air Force in February 1942 and served until 7 June 1950, at which time he was told that he was discharged as a captain. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Officer Promotion Section, AFPC/DPPPO, reviewed the application and states that applicant’s Military Record and Report of Separation/Certificate of Service is correct. The Air Force used Department of the Army Directives and Forms well beyond the date the Air Force became a...
AF | BCMR | CY2000 | BC-2000-02093
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not available at the time the application was filed.
AF | BCMR | CY2000 | BC-2000-02231
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). Therefore, we have no records upon which to determine whether or not applicant’s demotion was appropriate.
DocuShare Concept of Operations Program Concept - Customizable commercial off-the-shelfsoftware product from Xerox - Vastly simplifies publication to the web Primary Uses in TJAG Department - JA offices can create their own mini-versions of FLITE to store and research local work-product - Offices may be able to do electronic record keeping in DocuShare - Built-in features such as search engine and web site production could replace parts of FLITE architecture - Guest access makes it possible...