The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions d+L@+ VAUGH E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair V MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: BCMR Medical Consultant 1535 Command Drive, EE Wing, 3rd Floor Andrews AFB MD 20762-7002 14 April 1998 98-00580 P * REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant was discharged after...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Establish contact with the member and direct her to the nearest DOD Medical Treatment Facility for another psychological evaluation and completion of an AF Form 348. b.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00585 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: He be given consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 1997C (CY97A) Colonel Board with his current duty title, "Deputy Group Commander, effective 1 September 1997, added to his Officer Selection Brief (OSB). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief ,...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action, The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record...
Ltr, HQ ARPC/DP, 20 Apr 98 AFBCMR 98-00597 INDEX CODE 131.01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to show that he...
I' A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Separations Branch, Directorate of Personnel Program Management, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that they concur with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant's recommendation that applicant's narrative reason for separation should be changed to "Secretarial Authority" with a SPD of 'lJFF1' and her reentry code be changed to a3K.11 Applicant's characterization of service should remain the same since she did...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The available records clearly indicate that applicant received a dishonorable discharge from the general court and that portion of his sentence was upheld on appeal and ultimately executed by the convening authority. The Board of review found merit in applicant’s argument and provided him relief in the form of a dismissal of the...
A five-year ADSC? and applicant is not. Training ADSCs ............................................................................................................................................... 1.8.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarde'd to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force off ices evaluated applicant s request and provided advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
neither the member nor the former spouse requests the election change within the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Although their 29 Mar 96 divorce terminated the applicant's eligibility as the spouse beneficiary, the member did not request her coverage be canceled and the SBP premiums continued to be deducted from his retired pay until his 19 Oct 96 death. Recommendation: Although there is no avidence of Air Force error, to preclude a...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00610 t-tkil 51999 HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The additional "Excess Cost" of $334.11 she was assessed for shipping her Household Goods (HHG) to Wichita, KS, vice Kansas City, MO, be eliminated. Therefore, regardless of the shipment weight, the applicant would have still incurred excess cost charges to ship the property to the alternate destination. JPPSO-DTR...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE , WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00615 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF I Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United the States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent mili Force relating to show that thirtee leave balance. ...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
We reviewed the statement provided by the additional rater/reviewer on the 2 June 1997 OPR, who indicated it was his intention that the report be included in the applicant’s record considered by the cited selection board. We also noted applicant‘s contention that his primary AFSC was incorrect on his “selection Report on Individual Personnel.” However, primary A F S C s are not reflected on officer selection briefs reviewed by promotion selection boards, only the member’s duty AFSCs are...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-00630 COUNSEL: . After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00636 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: - - records of the Department of the Air Force relating t corrected to show that on 18...
RECORD AIR FORCE BOARD FOR OF PROCEEDINGS CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS ;gJJ I 3 -sS IN THE MATTER OF: -.-- DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 6 3 8 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 ( C e r t i f i c a t e of Release o r Discharge From Active Duty) be c o r r e c t e d t o r e f l e c t award of t h e Small A r m s Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the...
Despite the delays in passing the FY 1998 NDAA, the Air Force had the authority to implement the program. This resulted in not passing the authorization bill in a timely manner thus denying him the opportunity to retire in grade and forcing him to make a decision to submit his retirement application in order to get on with his post-Air Force career. The applicant contends that because the passage of the FY 1998 NDAA was delayed, he had to make a decision whether to apply for retirement in...
Applicant’s complete statement and documentary evidence submitted in support of his application are included as Exhibit A. seven-year ADSC. Applicant was not contracted to attend UPT until well after the 15 June 1988 change to the eight-year ADSC (Exhibit C with Attachments 1 and 2).
I " AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' JUL 2 4 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-00643 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be paid for accrued leave not verified on his DD Form 214. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant claims that he did not take this leave and did not receive payment...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, D.C. Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00647 1 24 JUL 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: ary records of the Department of the Air Force relating to corrected to show that on...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Evaluations Programs Branch, AFPC/DPPPE, reviewed the application and states the applicant’s claim that his senior rater informed him that the June 1997 OPR and CY97C PRF would be used to get the applicant non-selected is unsubstantiated. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The appropriate Air Force office reviewed the additional documentation and provided another advisory opinion to the Board recommending denial of the application (Exhibit F). Awarded the fourth oak leaf cluster for 19 Jul70, when he already has received a decoration for that date, would be more than dual recognition, it would be a...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 3UL f l9!B I I Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00664 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that eleven ( balance. ent of the...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). He applies now to change his reenlistment code from "2Q" to one that will allow reentry to the military if and when he might choose.
c AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AUG 1 4 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00672 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The duty titles on the training reports dated 12 September 1990 and 19 September 1991, be corrected to read "Chief Radiology Resident", and he receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for the Calendar Year 1996A (CY96A) Central Medical Corps/Dental Corps Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. Applicant requests the Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon be added to his records.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Requested Action, The applicant is requesting a change in his separation and reentry codes which would allow him to reenlist in the Air Force reserves. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate counseling was provided and appropriate action was taken.
DPPP stated that the letter from the rater supports removal of the contested OPR - it does not support replacing the report with a reaccomplished version. The rater's letter does not substantiate the report, as written, is invalid. After reviewing the evidence presented, we are persuaded that the applicant may not have been fairly evaluated by the additional rater/reviewer at the time the report was rendered.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00689 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: - The pertinen Force relating to show that: ment of the Air be corrected to a. ...
- The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant/counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant or counsel.
1 s i ., I Office of the Assistant Secretary \1 BC'JlR 98-00007 AIR FORCE BOLL-RD FOP- C O k A ? wclu:d bz a u t h o r i z e d to r e t u r n t o Germany 111 a rwpoi-a:-y d u t y (TDY) s t ; i t u s t o complete z s h i p his EX-*' and HHGs to h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r y He was a d v i s e d t h a t k I?-auld n o t be s t a t i o n k F Z i . 3 J and H H G s LC h i s new d u t y n e c e s s a r l r a c t i o n s A F B ) aiic -,&:as a d v i s e d t h a t h e would n o t be s t a t l...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinicn tc the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit Z . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for- review and response (Exhibit Dj. We note that applicant's request pertaining to Block 7A of his DD Form 214 has been corrected administratively; therefore, the only issue before this Board Is his r - e q i s s t that the 40LC be added to the MSM in Block 13.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The applicant is requesting that his mandatory separation date (MSD) of 1 April 1998 be extended to 27 November 1999 to allow for time he was assigned to the...
Funds allotted for payment of air mechanics are continued i n force u n t i l authorization for increased grades is received and conversion made i n compliance w i t h instructions above mechanics ratings t o noncommissioned grades is based on the fund8 allotted In t o the Air Corps f o r air mechanics grades within t h e present fiscal year. SUBJECT: TO : ,Appointment of' Air Mechanics t o Grades' Cammanding Generals, Army Air Forces, Army Ground Forces, Services of Supply, Armies, Army...
I Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. includes STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was selected to the grade of master sergeant in cycle 95A7, effective and with a date of rank of 1 September 1994. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed this application and states that should the Board void the contested report in its entirety or upgrade the overall rating, providing the applicant is otherwise eligible, he will be entitled to...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
nt of the Air be corrected to his J chief Examiher Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUL 1898 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 9 8 - 0 0 7 2 5 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT : Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an...
In reference to the applicant claiming the senior rater did not evaluate the officer's performance and assess his or her potential based on performance, IAW AFR 36-10; they state he bases this claim on the fact that individuals outside his chain of command reviewed his records and made suggested inputs to the senior rater for preparing the PRF. The applicant has not provided any evidence to support these allegations concerning the applicant's claim that officers outside the rating chain may...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00732 MAR 1 9 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen tment of the Air Force relating to be corrected to 1997...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be deriied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS 21 May 9 8 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 1535 Command Drive EE Wing, 3rd Floor Andrews AFB MD...
He receive supplemental promotion consideration for promotion to the grade of Chief Master Sergeant (E-9) by the promotion cycle 97E9. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 4 May 1998 for review and response within 30 days. In view of the foregoing, we recommend the contested report be...
The AFPC disability office established a 10 Jan 97 separation date after authorizing 20 days processing time and 10 days PTDY and notified the Military Personnel Flight on 12 Dec 96. The leave history shows 5 days leave 16 - 20 Dec 96,20 days PTDY 21 Dec 96 - 9 Jan 97, and a negative leave balance of minus 11.5 days. FACTS: Applicant was involuntarily separated fiom the Air Force on 10 Jan 97 for physical disability under the provisions of AFI 36-3212.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. Applicant did not identifjl any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant the stated reason for...
I I I I Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00749 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUL 15546 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF Sl’AFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10. United States Code, Air Force Instruction 3 6-2603, and having assured compliance with the proyisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that : current l e a ~ ~ e account. ry records of the Department of...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUN i 2 wga li Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00752 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating t be corrected to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00753 INDEX CODE: 107 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected by adding the appropriate awards/decorations as follows: Add the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) Add the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC)...
Exhibit C. Letter, AF/DPPC, dated 9 April 1 9 9 8 . Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 2 7 April 1 9 9 8 . Panel Chair Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00756 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF SEP 2 3 1998 Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: 1 records of the Department of the Air Force relating t show...