AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00696
COUNSEL :
HEARING DESIRED: No
Applicant requests award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal and
all others due. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. -
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant/counsel for review and response
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
.-
-
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant or
counsel. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights
to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Mr. Richard A.
Peterson, and Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler considered this application
on 29 September 1998 in accordance with the provisions of Air
Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C.
1552.
der*
VAUGH E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPPRA
550 C Street West Ste 12
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4714
2 June 1998
SUBJEC
Records (DD Form
9)
I. REQUESTED ACTION. Applicant requests award of the
“all others due.”
ervice Medal and
2. BASIS FOR REQUEST. Applicant states he was sent t
in Mar 91, but did not provide any documents to support his claim.
1 Jan 91 and returned
3. FACTS.
a. Applicant served on Active Duty 9 Jun 87-8 Jun 9 1, with two years’ overseas. He was
awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, National Defense Service Medal, Air Force
Overseas Long Tour Ribbon, and Air Force Training Ribbon.
b. Applicant has no paper or microfiche documents to indicate where or when his two years’
overseas duty was spent.
c. Applicant was reque
verify his claim of being in
98 to provide TDY orders and a Travel Voucher to
an-Mar 91. He did not respond.
4. DISCUSSION. Applicant has not provided any official documentation showing he was TDY
n 1991 or any other time. We can
e can not v
other awards associated with
*
verseas tour. Without
Service Medal or any
5. RECOMMENDATION.
We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s req
Service Medal or any other awards associated with the
FOR THE COMMANDER
GEORGIA A. WISE, DAFC
Recognition Programs Branch
Promotions, Eva1 & Recognition Div
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-01432 COUNSEL : HEARING DESIRED: YES JAN 13m ' Applicant requests that he be awarded the Armed Forces Medal (AFEM) , or other appropriate expeditionary Expeditionary medal, for his service in direct support of operations in Grenada between 23 October 1983 and 21 November 1983. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R FORCE H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FQRCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S -- 21 August 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPAPPl 550 C Street West, Ste...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01806 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO Form 214 (Certificate of be corrected to show his listed and the Vietnam Release Vietnam Service Applicant requests that his DD or Discharge From Active Duty) service dates and all schools Medal. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board- -recommending the application be denied...
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Asia Service request The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant requests award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal. The applicant’s records do not contain any documents showing he was in the 0 consecutive days [TDYJ, and he did not provide any, even when requested to ut documentation showing he was in the Area of Responsibility for...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant requests award of the I Service Medal. We recommend disapproval of the applicant's request to be awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). While on a tour, he stopped the bus for the members to see a herd of camels. This office is responsible for determining Air Force members’ eligibility and entitlement to awards and decorations, and your case was sent to us for review.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Background: During our review we were unable to locate documents that confirmed review his personal file m e r f o r m e d TDYs while assigned overseas.
The appropria-te Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Personnel who were assigned or attached members of units during the period for which campaign participation credit or assault landing credit was accorded to the unit are awarded the bronze service star and arrowhead, respectively, to denote their participation in the action. Personnel who were assigned or attached unit members...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). (2) Applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate his claim that he re- submitted a recommendation for the Air Medal or a request for reconsideration to upgrade the Aerial Achievement Medal to the Air Medal, or any responses to such submissions. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for his Aerial...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). (2) Applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate his claim that he re- submitted a recommendation for the Air Medal or a request for reconsideration to upgrade the Aerial Achievement Medal to the Air Medal, or any responses to such submissions. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for his Aerial...