Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00590
Original file (PD2009-00590.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS

CASE NUMBER: PD00900590 BOARD DATE: 20100525

SEPARATION DATE: 20080815

_________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: This Covered Individual (CI) was a Lance Corporal/E-3 (Combat Engineer/1371), medically separated from the Marine Corps in August 2008 after 1 year and 6 months of service. The basis for separation was Chronic Right Knee Pain due to Patello-femoral Chondromalacia. The painful Right Knee condition was determined to be medically unacceptable. The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for the painful Right Knee condition (Patello-femoral Chondromalacia), and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and DoD regulations.

_________________________________________________________________

CI’s CONTENTION (20090925): The CI states: “I think my findings should be changed due to the doctors’ evaluations. The doctors at Bethesda Naval Center examined my knee and their findings were very discouraging. They said that I was no longer fit for military duty and only some activities in civilian life. My knee as of now can never obtain another surgery, and I live with severe pain, and I am limited in my daily activities, including work and supporting my family. Since my discharge I have injured myself further, due to weakness and severe pain. While simply walking, I often fall. While working, instead of using my legs for lifting purposes, I use my back. Therefore I have pulled several muscles in my lower back.”

_________________________________________________________________

RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB 20080606 VA (n/a)
Condition Code Rating Date Condition Code Rating Exam Effective
Right Patellofemoral Chondromalacia with Anterior Knee Pain, Persistent 5299-5003 10% 20080606 CI did not apply for VA Examination or Disability; verified by PDBR Intake Unit n/a
Status Post Medial Meniscal Tear CAT II 20080606 CI did not apply for VA Examination or Disability; verified by PDBR Intake Unit n/a
TOTAL Combined: 10% TOTAL Combined (Includes Non-PEB Conditions): n/a

_________________________________________________________________


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Right Knee Pain – CI entered the Marine Corps Reserve in August 2005. Approximately 19 months later (March 2007) he jumped off the back of a military vehicle and twisted his right knee. Initially was treated with oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and Physical Therapy. A Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of right knee showed meniscal tear and partial tear of quadriceps tendon fibers. Right knee arthroscopic surgery was performed on 1 Oct 2007 by Dr. R. According to her note, she did partial medial meniscectomy, partial resection of inter-meniscal ligament, synovectomy of the patello-femoral joint, and localized chondroplasty of the medial tibial plateau and patella. Following surgery, the right knee continued to get worse, especially associated with prolonged flexion of the right knee, such as prolonged sitting. He also reported popping and locking up. CI also experienced increased pain with walking on uneven surfaces, stairs and hills. He had good range of motion (full extension, and flexion past 125-130 degrees), but he had pain with motion. Several examiners have confirmed that knee ligaments were intact, and there was no documented ligamentous instability of the right knee. The Board has examined all of the evidentiary information available, with regard to CI’s right knee condition. Following lengthy discussion, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right knee condition. The Board also unanimously agrees that “Status Post Medial Meniscal Tear” is contributory to the painful Right Knee Condition, but is not, in and of itself, unfitting. There is no justification for adding it as an independently unfitting condition. Therefore, a recommendation of “no recharacterization” of the PEB’s adjudication for the Right Knee condition is indicated. The Board understands that since the time of separation, CI has injured himself further, due to weakness and pain. However, the Board must base its findings on the CI’s condition at separation. Any injuries that occur after separation from service, are outside the scope of the Board and are therefore considered not relevant to the Board’s proceedings.

History of Other Conditions (documented in Disability Evaluation System (DES) package)- Tonsillectomy, Gastric ulcers, Dyspepsia, Bronchitis, Sinus irritation, Headaches, Sleep disturbance, and Influenza were all discussed and considered by the Board. There is no clearly documented evidence that any of these conditions caused any significant adverse effect on the performance of required military duties. These other conditions are all judged by the Board to be not unfitting at the time of separation from service, and are not relevant for disability rating. The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions.

_________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. Also, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.39 for rating the Right Knee condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that instruction by the Board.

In the matter of the “Right Patello-femoral Chondromalacia with Anterior Knee Pain” and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no recharacterization of the PEB coding or rating. In the matter of the “Status Post Medial Meniscal Tear,” the Board unanimously recommends no recharacterization of the PEB adjudication as not unfitting. In the matter of the History of Tonsillectomy, Gastric ulcers, Dyspepsia, Bronchitis, Sinus irritation, Headaches, Sleep disturbance, Influenza or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration; the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation.

_________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

_________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090925, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

President

Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL

OF REVIEW BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATION ICO XXXXX

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44

(b) PDBR ltr dtd 11 Jun 10

I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review (reference (b)) that Mr. XXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation, or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board.

Principal Deputy

Assistant Secretary of the Navy

(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00023

    Original file (PD2010-00023.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flexion (140⁰ normal)0-130⁰120⁰ (pain at 105⁰)Extension (0⁰ normal)-2⁰0⁰CommentPatellofemoral crepitusTenderness over knee medial worse than lateral; Positive patellar compression test§4.71a Rating10%10%At the time of the MEB exam on 2 November 2002, seven months prior to separation, the CI had severe left anterior knee pain which limited his activities of daily living. Negative testing included the McMurray test and tests for ligamentous instability; no effusion was noted and gait was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00653

    Original file (PD2009-00653.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the ACL deficient right knee condition as unfitting, and assigned a disability rating of 10%. In the matter of the ACL deficient right knee, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr. XXXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01061

    Original file (PD2011-01061.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB convened 26 April 2007 and after reviewing newly provided medical documents, adjudicated the right knee chondromalacia osteoarthritis of the medial compartment as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). In January 2005 surgical arthroscopy was performed on the knee revealing right knee chondromalacia of the patella with lateral patellar mal-tracking and chondromalacia of the medial femoral condyle and lateral tibial...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00593

    Original file (PD2011-00593.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    When I was injured, I tried to work and perform as I always had but was unable due to the pain in both knees from my injury. Accordingly, the Board recommends a separate service disability rating for each knee. In the matter of the bilateral knee pain, the Board unanimously recommends that each joint be separately adjudicated as follows: an unfitting right knee condition coded 5259-5010 and rated 10%, and an unfitting left knee condition coded 5259-5010 and rated 10%, IAW VASRD §4.40,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00514

    Original file (PD2009-00514.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Approximately one month after the CI separated from service he had surgery (20050518) to correct his ACL tear and lateral meniscus tear in his right knee. No evidence this condition was unfitting at the time of separation from service. After careful consideration of all available records the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s right knee condition is most appropriately rated at a combined 20% with 10% for 5259 Right Knee Medial and Lateral Meniscal Tear, s/p Repair of Medial...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00858

    Original file (PD2012-00858.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions forwarded to the PEB were left knee medial meniscus tear and left knee patellar chondromalacia. The PEB adjudicated the left knee condition as not unfitting and recommended the CI was “Fit to Continue on Active Duty.” The CI requested a Records Review Panel reconsideration of his case and filed a 2 page statement outlining why “the findings are not compatible with the evidence provided and the condition I currently have.” The Records Review Panel agreed with the CI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00352

    Original file (PD2009-00352.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, upon reconsideration with further evidence from the Senior Medical Board Orthopedic Surgeon the PEB determined the CI was unfit and he was then separated with a 10% disability for 5299-5003 Medial Meniscus Transplant using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. The VA does not seem to understand this procedure as well due the fact the VA rates my right knee as an ACL replacement, meniscal repair...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00321

    Original file (PD2010-00321.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the CMP right knee with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) as unfitting rated 20% disability IAW Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board determined that the rating for the right knee is 10% for painful motion based on the orthopedic exam proximate to separation and the C&P exam after separation. In the matter of the left knee, endometriosis or any other condition eligible for Board consideration, the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01594

    Original file (PD2012 01594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: CASE: PD1201594BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 20130418 Physical Disability Board of Review SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130010178 (PD201201594)I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00494

    Original file (PD2011-00494.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flexion (140⁰ normal)“approximately 0 to 125⁰”100⁰110⁰Extension (0⁰ normal)0⁰0⁰CommentVarus deformity, palpable femoral osteophytes, scar, crepitus, TTP, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg McMurray’s, mildly pos patellar grind3+ effusion, TTP (medial joint line & lat epicondyle), 30 ml normal joint fluid aspirated, steroid injected; Hx incr pain & effusion due to moving over last 2-3 wks, no lockingPainful motion, crepitus, scar nontender, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg...