Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00352
Original file (PD2009-00352.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: Marine corps

CASE NUMBER: PD200900352 BOARD DATE: 20090916

SEPARATION DATE: 20040930

________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was a Sergeant Field Radio Operator medically separated from the Marine Corp in 2004 after more than thirteen years of service in the Marine Corps and the Army. The medical basis for the separation was Medial Meniscus Transplant. CI was referred to the Navy Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit, and separated at 10% disability.

MEDICAL HISTORY: The CI was first seen for right knee pain in May 1990. In May of 2000 he had positive Lachman's sign and anterior drawer sign of the right knee. The CI underwent ACL reconstruction in August 2000, at which time he underwent partial medial meniscectomy. Unfortunately, he continued to re-tear his medial meniscus and underwent complete medial meniscectomy of his right knee in July 2003 und continued to remain symptomatic in his medial compartment, despite an adequate postoperative rehabilitation program. Based on these findings, a decision was made to perform a medial meniscal transplant. After this surgery he did well with unlimited ambulatory tolerance and was able to perform light weight squats and leg presses without complaints at three months postoperative. However, the orthopedic surgeon cautioned that this meniscal transplant is considered a temporary measure to gain time before performing a knee replacement and that the CI should not engage in any strenuous activity such as running, impact loading activities, and carrying heavy loads. He strongly recommended the CI be medically separated. So while the CI was doing well his activities were still severely restricted.

The Informal PEB initially determined he was fit for continued military service. However, upon reconsideration with further evidence from the Senior Medical Board Orthopedic Surgeon the PEB determined the CI was unfit and he was then separated with a 10% disability for 5299-5003 Medial Meniscus Transplant using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations.

________________________________________________________________

CI CONTENTION: CI contends: “I do not feel the board was aware of the severity, and the permanent affect the procedure will have on my life and my employment limitations. The board based on my doctor's comments in his Physical Evaluation Board Addendum slates the boards understanding of Medial Meniscal Transplant is clearly incomplete. My Doctor stated I will need full knee arthroplasty in one to ten years from the date of my surgery. My knee has been bothering me. I take narcotic pain medicine daily and wear knee braces. So it is clear that soon I will need full knee replacement and I won't be able to work. I have other medical problems as well but when my knee goes I don't know what kind of work I will be able to do. I’m only forty and facing full knee replacement. The VA does not seem to understand this procedure as well due the fact the VA rates my right knee as an ACL replacement, meniscal repair which I had in 2000. There are limited doctors in the country that deal with this procedure. So I am totally convinced that the board did not consider the employment and lifetime obstacles I’m facing with this condition and the board's findings were not appropriate and were unfair. I request that PDBR read the Physical Evaluation Board Addendum that my Doctor wrote this will help to understand the procedure. I also respectfully and humbly request the PDBR change my rating to at least the minimum required to receive some type of retirement benefits. The severance pay I received when I was separated is taken out of my VA check monthly. I am paying all of it back, so it is like I really got nothing. I served nearly fourteen years and I gave One Hundred and Ten percent in everything I did while I was in the military. This took a very heavy toll on my mind and body. The PDBR will see in box fourteen where I listed all my VA rated injuries and illnesses. I have this condition that really no one but the doctor that did the procedure realizes the severity and permanent effect it has on my life. This condition deteriorates as time passes it will not get better it will only worse as my doctor stated.”

________________________________________________________________

RATING COMPARISON:

Previous Determinations
Service VA
PEB Condition Code
Medial Meniscus Transplant (7173) 5299-5003
TOTAL Combined: 10%

TOTAL Combined (incl non-PEB Dxs): 20% from 2001412

0% from 20010711 (Active Duty)

50% from 20041001

60% from 20050915

90% from 20060405

80% from 20060415

90% from 20081007

________________________________________________________________

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Knee Medial Meniscus Transplant

The Navy PEB rated this condition analogous to 5003 Degenerative Arthritis. Using an evaluation completed prior to the time of separation from the Navy, the Veterans Administration (VA) rated this disability as 5010-5258 Internal Derangement, Right Knee, Status Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair, Meniscal Repair, with Chondromalacia and Degenerative Joint Disease at 20%. This rating was based on knee pain, painful motion, and additional flares due to pain, fatigue, weakness, and lack of endurance after repetitive use. He had limited mobility and his knee condition interfered with work and daily activities.

Neither the Navy nor VA examinations showed limit of knee range of motion (ROM) at the compensable level or knee instability. However both documented similar levels of functional impairment as a result of the temporizing medial meniscus transplant and the CI’s other knee impairments. The Navy Orthopedic Surgeon assigned a Cincinnati functional rating of 4 out of 10. While the CI was able to perform most activities of daily living, he could not perform any activity beyond normal walking without pain and swelling and was in fact advised to limit his activities to prolong the usefulness of his transplant.

________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the PDBR to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. After careful consideration of all available information, the Board unanimously concluded that the CI’s condition is appropriately rated at a 20% for 5299-5258 Internal Derangement, Right Knee, Status Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair and Medial Meniscal Transplant, with Chondromalacia Patella and Degenerative Joint.

This rating is based on the inability to engage in activities beyond basic activities of daily living and walking limited distances without pain and swelling. The CI cannot perform even moderately strenuous activities and cannot engage in sustained activity as repetitive use leads to increased pain, fatigue, weakness, and lack of endurance. These functional limitations interfere with both work and daily living.

The Board also examined left knee, torn pectoralis muscle, status post bilateral inguinal hernia repair, and scars from knee and hernia surgeries and did not find any of these conditions to be unfitting. The other diagnoses rated by the VA were not mentioned in any PEB paperwork and could not be considered by the Board.

________________________________________________________________


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of the CI’s prior medical separation.

Unfitting Condition VASRD Code Rating
Internal Derangement, Right Knee, Status Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair and Medial Meniscal Transplant, with Chondromalacia Patella and Degenerative Joint Disease 5299-5258 20%
Combined 20%

________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090511, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

President

Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE

AFFAIRS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATION

ICO XXXXXX

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44

Encl: (1) PDBR ltr dtd 29 Sep 09

1. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and accept, in part, the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review (enclosure (1)).

2. Mr. XXXXX’s official records are to be corrected to reflect the following disposition:

a. Separation from the naval service due to physical disability rated at 20% (vice 10%) effective 30 Sep 2005.

3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement this decision and Mr. XXXX is notified once those actions are completed.

Assistant Secretary of the Navy

(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00514

    Original file (PD2009-00514.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Approximately one month after the CI separated from service he had surgery (20050518) to correct his ACL tear and lateral meniscus tear in his right knee. No evidence this condition was unfitting at the time of separation from service. After careful consideration of all available records the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s right knee condition is most appropriately rated at a combined 20% with 10% for 5259 Right Knee Medial and Lateral Meniscal Tear, s/p Repair of Medial...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00023

    Original file (PD2010-00023.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flexion (140⁰ normal)0-130⁰120⁰ (pain at 105⁰)Extension (0⁰ normal)-2⁰0⁰CommentPatellofemoral crepitusTenderness over knee medial worse than lateral; Positive patellar compression test§4.71a Rating10%10%At the time of the MEB exam on 2 November 2002, seven months prior to separation, the CI had severe left anterior knee pain which limited his activities of daily living. Negative testing included the McMurray test and tests for ligamentous instability; no effusion was noted and gait was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00389

    Original file (PD2011-00389.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The multiply-operated left knee with anteromedial knee pain, subjective instability and mechanical symptoms condition, analogously coded 5299-5003, per VASRD direction, would warrant a 10% rating as given by the PEB and the VA. With non-compensable ROM...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01061

    Original file (PD2011-01061.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB convened 26 April 2007 and after reviewing newly provided medical documents, adjudicated the right knee chondromalacia osteoarthritis of the medial compartment as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). In January 2005 surgical arthroscopy was performed on the knee revealing right knee chondromalacia of the patella with lateral patellar mal-tracking and chondromalacia of the medial femoral condyle and lateral tibial...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00858

    Original file (PD2012-00858.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions forwarded to the PEB were left knee medial meniscus tear and left knee patellar chondromalacia. The PEB adjudicated the left knee condition as not unfitting and recommended the CI was “Fit to Continue on Active Duty.” The CI requested a Records Review Panel reconsideration of his case and filed a 2 page statement outlining why “the findings are not compatible with the evidence provided and the condition I currently have.” The Records Review Panel agreed with the CI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00832

    Original file (PD2011-00832.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB and VA each coded the individual knees at 10% using the criteria for arthritis (5003), with the VA indicating a traumatic onset by using code 5010. Left Knee : With regards to the left knee, the Board considered that the preponderance of the record supported the 10% rating for the left knee for limited motion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01984

    Original file (PD-2014-01984.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board deliberated on if the CI’s degree of instability with additional meniscal signs of catching and pain with knee degeneration warranted a “severe” 30% rating under 5257, or dual knee rating with additional rating under 5259 for meniscal symptoms (catching and pain)that did not overlap with ACL instability symptoms (instability). The prior to separation VA exam documented normal hand findings. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00494

    Original file (PD2011-00494.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flexion (140⁰ normal)“approximately 0 to 125⁰”100⁰110⁰Extension (0⁰ normal)0⁰0⁰CommentVarus deformity, palpable femoral osteophytes, scar, crepitus, TTP, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg McMurray’s, mildly pos patellar grind3+ effusion, TTP (medial joint line & lat epicondyle), 30 ml normal joint fluid aspirated, steroid injected; Hx incr pain & effusion due to moving over last 2-3 wks, no lockingPainful motion, crepitus, scar nontender, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01645

    Original file (PD2012 01645.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Persistent Anterior Knee Pain Condition .The CI originally had a sport-related injury to his right knee in September 2001.A torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was addressed arthroscopically in November 2001,followed by rehabilitative treatment.The CI re-injured his right knee (buckled and popped) while stepping from an aircraft in January 2002, and required a right ACLallograft reconstruction in March 2002.He did well post-operatively with progressive physical therapy (PT) until another...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01153

    Original file (PD2010-01153.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    I currently have to take pain medication often on a regular basis over the years for pain from my condition. Right Knee Condition . The Board notes that the MEB and initial VA C&P exams bracket the date of separation.