Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00035
Original file (PD2009-00035.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY

CASE NUMBER: PD0900035 BOARD DATE: 20091029

SEPARATION DATE: 20060330

________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was an active duty warrant officer in flight training, medically separated from the Army in 2006 after 4 years of service. The medical basis for the separation was obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This was diagnosed in 2005 during the course of a work-up for fatigue and palpitations. There was a favorable response to CPAP (nocturnal assisted breathing device), but the flight surgeon directed a MEB which, in turn, determined that the condition was medically unacceptable. The CI had an additional history of persistent back pain dating to 2003. The back condition was specifically addressed by the MEB and forwarded as not unfitting on the DA 3947. The CI’s palpitations were evaluated by cardiology, and suspected to be related to the OSA. The arrhythmia was discussed in the NARSUM and noted to have been improved with CPAP, but was not forwarded on the DA 3947. There was a history of various other medical conditions, including moderate obesity, but none of significant acuity or severity at the time of the MEB. The CI was referred to the PEB, found unfit for OSA only and separated at 0% disability.

________________________________________________________________

CI CONTENTION: The CI contends that he should have been rated under the VASRD instead of ‘the DoDI 1332.39 standards’. The application also stated his desire to acquire a new MOS and remain on active duty at the time he was separated.

________________________________________________________________

RATING COMPARISON:

Service PEB VA (3 Mo. after Separation)
Condition Code Rating Date Condition Code Rating Exam Effective
OSA 6847 0% 20051216 OSA 6847 50% 20060616 20060331
CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN NOT UNFITTING 20051216 CHRONIC LUMBAR STRAIN 5237 10% 20060616 20060331
NO DA 3947 ENTRY. PVC’s 7010 10% 20060616 20060331
NO ADDITIONAL DA 3947 ENTRIES. NON-PEB X 5 / NSC X 3 20060616 20060331
TOTAL Combined: 0% TOTAL Combined (Includes Non-PEB Conditions): 60%

________________________________________________________________

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

OSA Rating. This issue is uncomplicated from a Board decision-making standpoint. Although the OSA was stable on CPAP, the PEB adjudicated the condition as unfitting. This was perhaps because of the CI’s flight training status. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board cannot override a PEB adjudication of unfitness; its purview lies only with adjudications as fit. The DA 199 makes it clear that the PEB 0% rating was derived from DoDI 1332.39 (E2.A1.2.21), ‘rated for mild industrial impairment’. The Board, of course, must adjudicate IAW VASRD §4.100 which compels a 50% rating for OSA requiring CPAP. The obligatory Board recommendation, therefore, is a rating of 50% for OSA.

Back Condition. The CI’s back condition was adequately evaluated and determined to be medically acceptable by the MEB. There is nothing in the medical record which would challenge the PEB adjudication that it was not unfitting. The NARSUM is explicit regarding the lack of limitations imposed by the condition and states, ‘intermittent, mild lower back pain with a very low level of intensity and this is not felt to be disabling from his activities thus far’. The Commander’s statement was cursory, but did not implicate the back as an impediment to duty. The medical profile was L2. All evidence considered, there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting recharacterization of the PEB fitness adjudication for the back condition.

Cardiac Arrhythmia. The CI’s irregular heart rhythm was diagnosed as symptomatic PVC’s (premature ventricular contractions) by cardiology, a fairly benign condition. It was treated with medications for a brief period, but the irregularity improved after the OSA was controlled on CPAP. Medications were discontinued. This condition had already been cleared for flight status prior to the MEB. A formal AR 40-501 determination by the MEB and specific fitness adjudication by the PEB would have been preferable. There is no reason, however, to suspect the condition would have been considered unfitting by the PEB and no basis for a Board recommendation as unfitting.

Other Conditions. The CI was evaluated by gastroenterology during the MEB process for episodic diarrhea following a cholecystectomy in 2004, and was also noted with mild reflux disease. These were stable, mild conditions at the time of separation. He had a BMI of 34.7, but still was within weight standards. The VA noted a number of minor orthopedic conditions in addition to the lumbar condition. Only 2 were service-connected, and those were rated 0%. The Board, therefore, has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating.

________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.39 for rating OSA was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that instruction by this Board. In the matter of the OSA condition, the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 50% under 6847 IAW VASRD §4.100. In the matter of the back condition, cardiac arrhythmia and all of the CI’s other medical conditions; the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend a finding of unfit for additional rating at separation.

________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA 6847 50%
COMBINED 50%

________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090120, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00254

    Original file (PD2009-00254.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Commander’s statement and the Behavioral Health screening exam do, however, document issues with somnolence and alertness which could be an unfitting impairment. This is therefore the Board’s recommendation in regards to this condition. Other Conditions .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00098

    Original file (PD2009-00098.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the back condition (rated 10%) and OSA (rated 0%) as unfitting. The neurology addendum and the MEB physical, both within two months of the VA examination, documented a normal gait. Other Conditions .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00076

    Original file (PD2009-00076.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI had excessive daytime sleepiness and was diagnosed with OSA requiring CPAP as noted above. Right Knee Condition . The 5 months after separation VA exam, demonstrated ‘tender patella tendon, tender patella rub, prominent tibial tubercle; no instability.’ History on both exams noted increased pain with activity, walking and standing, but did not indicate painful motion, or pain-limited motion of the knee.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00233

    Original file (PD2009-00233.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Each was rated 0%. The Board, therefore, has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating. The Action Officer continues to support the initial recommendation preceding the Board’s deliberation, i.e., a VASRD §4.100 rating of 50% for OSA as an unfitting condition.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00649

    Original file (PD2011-00649.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the lumbar spine condition as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy; the left ankle condition as unfitting, rated 0%, citing criteria of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD); the OSA condition as unfitting, rated 0%, citing criteria of Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39; and, the pes planus condition as unfitting, rated 0%, citing criteria of the USAPDA pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00927

    Original file (PD2011-00927.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the history of chest pain with EKG evidence of a septal infarct and sinus arrhythmia condition and the asthma condition as unfitting, rated 0% and 0% respectively, with likely application of DoDI 1332.39 and the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The VA coded the CI’s combined respiratory conditions (asthma and OSA) as 6602-6847 at 50% IAW VASRD §4.96 (a) and stated “The law requires when certain respiratory conditions coexist, a single...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00625

    Original file (PD2011-00625.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty member, SSG/E-5 (3P051/Security Forces Journeyman), medically separated from the Air Force after 10 years of service. VA treatment notes through 2008 show the CI continued to use his CPAP machine. Other PEB Conditions .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00540

    Original file (PD2012-00540.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The 2003 Veteran Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed to the current §4.71a rating standards in 2004, and were identical to the 2003 VASRD standards used by the VA in its initial rating decision. Board members agreed that elements of the 20% rating were not present on any of the cited examinations and further noted that there was no evidence of “incapacitating episodes”...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01914

    Original file (PD2012 01914.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At TDRL entry, the PEB adjudicated the CI’s asthma condition as unfitting, and coded 6602 (bronchial asthma) at 30%.The Board deliberated whether the CI’s asthma condition met the 30%, or the 60% 6602 rating at the time of TDRL entry. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00557

    Original file (PD2011-00557.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the cervical spine and OSA conditions as unfitting; assigning a disability rating of 10% to the cervical condition citing criteria of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD); and, 0% to the OSA condition referencing Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39. Other PEB Conditions . The other conditions forwarded by the MEB and adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB were lumbar spondylosis (pain dating to same fall as for the cervical...