DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No: 1352-02
26 August 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested the correction
of three alleged errors in your medical board report.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 August 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
In this regard, the Board noted that the report of your pre-enlistment physical
examination indicates you had flat feet. In addition, it noted that on 5 March 1991, you
requested that you be discharged from the Marine Corps as soon as possible, without
entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy, because of your
foot conditions. Finally, the Board rejected your unsubstantiated contention to the effect that
you were not prescribed shoe inserts.
In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
In this regard, it is
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFETFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04078-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were discharged from the Navy on 21 September 2002 by reason of fraudulent enlistment because of your concealment of pre-service drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09341-08
It is noted that the Commandant: of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested reports for 17 August 2001 to 16 January 2002 and 17 January to 17 June 2002 by changing the entry in section A, item 8.a, from “xX” (required to fire pistol but did not fire) to “N” (not required to qualify with pistol); and the report for 15 May to 31 December 2003 by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “one weakness [you have] made good improvement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07753-01
You requested removal of your failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board and “promotion reconsideration:” Your additional request to remove the reviewing officer ’s certification from your fitness report for 31 December 1998 to 31 July 1999 was not considered, as your previous request to remove the entire report, docket number 5441-01, was considered and denied on 30 August 2001, and you have offered no new and material supporting evidence or other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07415-08
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2009. In addition, the Board considered the three reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 30 July and 20 October 2008 and 3 June 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09569-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the report for 1 August to 27 September 2002 as you requested. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted: of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board’s file on your other case (docket number 8538-09), your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02835-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 12 August 1978 you received a general discharge. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03838-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested report for 29 December 2001 to 15 May 2002. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07459-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 22 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance applicable to the proceedings of this Board, consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board rejected your contention to the effect that the absence of documents...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03315-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The offenses...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08575-09
29 March to 31 July 2001: “-With continued growth and development will do extremely well.” 2. It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed the requested modification of the report for 1 February to 24 May 2002; and directed that the report for 25 May to 19 December 2002 be modified by removing both the language whose removal you expressly requested and the following immediately preceding language, to which you did not expressly object: “Gaining a grasp on his role...