Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01444-02
Original file (01444-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 1444-02
4 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,  your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CDRNAVRESFOR memorandum 1780 Ser
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and

 

N12/597 of 18 July 2002, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE  

NAL 

I

COMMANDER NAVAL RESERVE FORC
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 701465000

E

IN REPLY REFER TO

1780
Ser 

N12/ 

5gv

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Commander,
Board for Correction of Naval Records

Naval Reserve Force

ION ICO

(a) BCNR Docket 01444-02
(b) COMNAVRESFORINST  

1780.1A

Encl:

(1) Department of the Army  

ltr  of 6 Jun 2000

was transferred to the Individual

onboard  the base where her

Reference (a) is not supported.

1.
2.
Ready Reserve (IRR) for unsatisfactory drill participation
because she could no longer drill  
unit was assigned.
Enclosure (1) documents the circumstances
that barred her from entry to the U.S. Naval Forces, Europe Ease
because of her own willful misconduct.
3.
due to their own willful misconduct,
six-year obligation,
participants.
entitled to MGIB-SR benefits.

members that are transferred to the IRK

Per reference (b),

will be terminated as

unsatisfactory

prior to completing their

Therefore

is not

Point of contact is Mr.

4.
6'78-6649 or DSN 678-6649.

By\direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02889-02

    Original file (02889-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 S JLP: ddj Docket No: 2889-02 20 August 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06634-01

    Original file (06634-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07238-02

    Original file (07238-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with al material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulatio opinion furnished attached. Consequently, naval record, the burden is on the applicant to robable material error or injustice. nlisted via the Accelerated Initial Accession the Advanced Pay Grade mporary e Army Reserve, vice Veteran e, however, e. she should have been accessed (OSVET) program or Prior Service her ASVAB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01790-05

    Original file (01790-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC 1100 Ser N1C2/730 of 22 Aug 05, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01045-05

    Original file (01045-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1045-0530 August 2005This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00947-02

    Original file (00947-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 20 March 2002, a copy of which is attached. Even if Petitioner's claim that he had "permission" to miss a drill period to "take some time to find a new place to live and obtain new uniforms" was true, the recommendation for administrative separation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05622-02

    Original file (05622-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. enlistment contract required you to participate in 48 drills and perform 14 days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year. Accordingly, your application The names and votes of the members of the panel An individual separated with such a The Board did not consider whether your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04759-02

    Original file (04759-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contract required...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03604-07

    Original file (03604-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-352G of 5 Jun 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (c), members who initially entered active duty after 30 June 1985 and immediately enrolled in the MGIB Program, are eligible to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600389

    Original file (ND0600389.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I would like the board to please review my case and give me am upgrade of honorable and a reenlistment code of RE-1.Sincerely, (Applicant’s rank and signature) PO3 M_ R_ (Applicant) ” Issues as stated on an additional attached letter also dated December 4, 2005:I would like to respond to the statement of the commanding officer J. E. R_. 050318: Commanding Officer, Naval Air Reserve, Fort Worth, notified Commander, Navy Personnel Command (PERS-913), that the Applicant was discharged on...