DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TJR
Docket No: 1433-02
15 August 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary materi'al considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 31 October 1961 at the age of
On 10 May 1962, after undergoing a medical examination in
19.
which you complained of tension, insomnia, nightmares, enuresis,
and increasing aggressive tendencies,
you expressed doubt that
you could satisfactorily complete your enlistment. At that time
Seven
YOU were recommended for an administrative separation.
days later, on 17 May 1962, you
(NJP) for a three day period of
awarded extra duty for a week.
for a five day period of UA and
weeks.
received
unauthorized absence and were
On 12 June 1962 you received NJP
were awarded restriction for two
nonjbdicial punishment
Subsequently, you processed for
action by reason of unsuitability.
At that time you waived your
rights to consult with legal counsel and to submit a statement in
rebuttal to the separation.
authority directed
unsuitability, and on 25 June 1962, you were so discharged.
a general discharge by reason of
an administrative separation
On 21 June 1962 the discharge
Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and overall
trait averages which are computed from marks assigned during
An average
periodic evaluations.
of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for
a fully honorable characterization of service.
Your conduct average was 3.5.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity and your contention that you believe
that because of your physical condition, the characterization of
Nevertheless, the
your discharge should be fully honorable.
Board concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient
to warrant a change in the characterization of your service
because of your misconduct,
insufficiently high to warrant an fully honorable discharge.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
and since your conduct average was
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08134-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 1 August 1962 you were issued a general discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02437-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03720-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02013-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08479-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. circumstances in your case the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07844-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Your conduct average was 3.8. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 1 November 1960 you received NJP for On 30 January 1961 you were convicted by convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of absence from your appointed place of duty and were sentenced to restriction and extra duty for 10 days and a $40 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08190-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 8190-01 24 May 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. sitting in executive session, considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, application on 20 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08381-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your case was forwarded and 17 May 1976, the separation authority directed that you be separated with a type warranted by your service record discharge by reason of unsuitability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11227-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and...