DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC1:yr.j
Docket No: 1374-02
0
July 2002
is
After careful
evidence
injustice. In this
the advisory opinion.
the members of the
and
conscientirm
consikr;llion
siibniittcd was
insuff‘icicnt to
Board
conn&on, the
eoIire record,
of‘
eslal1lish the
substantially concurred with the
rlw
cxistcnce of probable material error or
L?mrd
found that the
coninients contained in
the
Accordingly,
panel will
be
your
1‘urnisliCtl
;tpplic;dion has
up011 request.
been denied. The names and votes of
that the
It is regretted
You are entitled to
evidence
or
to
mind
when applying
demonstrate
keep in
circiiiilst:~nces
have
the
l3curcl
previously
nxtttrr riot
other
I-c>:
tllat a
for
the
prt‘skiml)tion
ot’ an
probable
;I
existmice
correctioii
01‘
01‘
ol‘ficial
_
Lll:Ileii)J
mval
iiintt~rial
your
c;\se
01‘
rc‘coiisiclc’r its
tlrcision
upon
I!oartl.
all
tlic
:itt;~chi~s to
recc)rd, the
c’rror
or
in.j\Istice.
coil:,idcred by
sut~nlission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
ol‘l‘icial records. Consequently,
burden is
011 the applicant to
ni-e
such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVY
PERSONNEL COMM AN D
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
Y
7220
PERS-823
12 June 02
MEMORANDUM FOR SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR BCNR MATTERS (PERS-OOZCB)
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
(a) BCNR MEMORANDUM 5420 PERS-OOZCB of
25 April 01
(1) PERS-823
ltr 1070
Ser-823/046 of 08 May 02;
Extraordinary Heroism Request ICO SNM
Per reference (a),
1 .
Extraordinary Heroism was sent to the Secretary of the Navy
(board of Decorations and Medals) on 08 May 02.
request was returned with the board recommendation that
a request for determination of
NOT BE accorded the. benefits of Extraordinary heroism.
The finalized
Secretary of the Navy's office approved the boards
recommendation on 04 June 02.
My POC in this matter is Mr.
2.
(901) 874-3250.
’
.he may be reached at
DEPAH-IWCNT
I’lAfl
ORIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380564000
PERSONNLL COMMAND
INTlCGRITY
W20
Ol: THE NAVY
1070
Sex
08 May 02
823/046
E’som:
:
'I'0
Chief of Naval
Secretary of
the
Perfionnel
Navy (Board of Decorations and Medals)
k:ncl
:
(1) Copy
of citation(s)
I..
Subject member
has been
Eeleased to
;Iccor:dsncc
that a determination be made from the enclosure after
t-o
rJ.th the provisions of 10
wklether or not act,
hcts constitute
or
i_'he
WZC 6330.
Fleet Reserve in
is
I;t
requested.
the! fact
as
extraordinary heroism.
.-..-I--
Date
Ser
16 MAY
282
02
014
CIINAVPEKS
ltr 1070
s,er
82.7/046
of,8
Mnv 02
__"I_
Navy
Deparllmcnt Roar-d
of Decorations
and
FIKYT ENDORSEMENT
Men&r,
FKWI:
Senior
Medals
SccretaXy
TO:
Of-
the
Navy
Suhj:
EXTRAORDINARY
HEilOISM
1. The Board
accorded the benefits of extraordinary heroism:
below named
tccomcnds
the
Chat:
enli.stod man "NOT
_PIX"
Datc 4
J-ll~1C 200 2
Fr-om
:
To:
'U'la
1,
Uoarrd,
of
Secretary
Naval.
Chief
SecfeLnry of'
of.
the
Navy
Pcrsonrzal
the Navy approves the recommendation of
the
e-F.---__._
-.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01184-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 Pers 823 of 22 April 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01679-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2002. The Board was likewise unable to find that the Commander, Naval Surface Reserve Force denied your right to an interview with him; that he inadequately reviewed the DFC documentation; or that he wrongfully concurred with and forwarded the DFC recommendation. Since the Board found that the DFC and related fitness report should stand, they had no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08073-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. request comments and recommendations in Specifically, petitioner requests increase Per reference (b), only those personnel who are transferred 2. to the Fleet Reserve are accorded the increase of retainer pay for Extraordinary Heroism. Assistant Officer Retirements Branch Head, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05721-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ?,lve determined that only members who transfer to the Fleet ;3eserve after 4 December 1987 are eligible for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00953-01
They substantially concur with the PERS-61 opinion at enclosure (2) in finding that the fitness report at issue should be corrected as requested. report of 3. Only the reporting senior who signed the original fitness report may submit supplementary material for file in the member ’s record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05323-01
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report and related material: Date of Report Reporting Senior Period From of Report To 98Sep14 b. Based on that assessment, I recommend Lieutenant Commander itness report for the requested period and the Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENT LIEUTENANT COMMANDE "failure to select" be removed from her record, and that she considered by a Special Selection Board for promotion to the grade of Commander. The member...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03865-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 PERS-823 of 2 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01188-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 118842 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United Stares Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07085-00
PERS-833 recommends disapproving Petitioner ’s request to remove the letter which removed his name from the promotion board report. ” e. In correspondence attached as enclosure PERS-06L6, the NPC Office of Legal Counsel, has commented that they recommend favorable action on Petitioner ’s request to have removed from his permanent record all reference to the NJP which has been set aside, but do not recommend favorable action on his request to remove the contested letter. c. Reference (b)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05262-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the three enlisted performance evaluation reports for 16 July to 3 November 1998, 4 November 1998 to 3 February 1999, and 4 February to 3 May 1999. The second opinion recommended that her request be approved, stating that she would have been selected for advancement from Cycle 160,...