Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01454-00
Original file (01454-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVY 

2 

NAVAL.RECORDS

 
ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP:ddj
Docket No:  
26 November 2002

1454-00

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 26 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum  ‘5420 Ser  
copy of which is attached.

Your allegations of error and

N121/3 18 of 12 April 2002, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,  your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE 

NAVY

COMMANDER NAVAL RESERVE FORCE

4400 

DAUPHINE  STREET

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70146-5046

IN REPLY REFER TO.

5420
Ser 

N121/ 

188 

11’2 

AF’R 

2007

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Commander,
Board for Correction of Naval Records

Naval Reserve Force

E OF

(a) COMNAVRESFORINST 

1100.4A

(1) Application for Correction of M

(DD Form 149) of 23 Feb 00

ilita ry Record

1.

In response to enclosure  

(l),  the following

is provided:

a.

Reference (a) provides guidance for management and
administration of the Naval Reserve Incentive Programs which
if a member voluntarily separates from the Selected
states,
Reserve for any reason,
or Active Duty for Training for more than 179 consecutive days,
shall be terminated from eligibility.

including Active Duty for Special Work,

b.

Member returned to Active Duty 'in November 1990 making

him ineligible for the remainder of his bonus.
was terminated in December 1990 and member paid the pro-rated
amount of $166.80 as his final payment.

Member's bonus

L_  3

.

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06619-01

    Original file (06619-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations arid proceedings of this Board. Your allegations of error and injustice procediires applicable to the actdition, the Board considered the advisory Records, sitting in executive In 5730 Ser N 12 l/320 of 12 April 2002, a After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07017-00

    Original file (07017-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 7017-00 12 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy _ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Reserve Reenlistment bonus...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07012-00

    Original file (07012-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 7012-00 12 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a Reserve Reenlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00019-02

    Original file (00019-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NRF, letter, 5730 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nurse Corps officer may apply In 1998, she was assigned NOBCs 19766 (Family Nurse Practitioner with Master's level No other specialties have been assigned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05914-02

    Original file (05914-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum ‘5730 Ser 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07000-02

    Original file (07000-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 2002. that would allow payment of an $8,000 He shipped to Recruit T In his petition, Seaman 2001, and signed contract for a volunteered for the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05290-02

    Original file (05290-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. comment and recommendation on former requests the recoupment petition. case was ed portion of N130 recommends denial is not entitled to keep the SRB is a retention incentive paid to enlisted members serving 2 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05957-07

    Original file (05957-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100DJC Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2082 14

    Original file (NR2082 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC memo 5420 Ser N1/1169 of 20 Nov 14, a copy of which is attached. Under the governing regulations, to be eligible to transfer benefits, a member must be on active duty or in the selective reserve at the time of the election to transfer. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01396-00

    Original file (01396-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y S 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser 14 June 2000 N130D/ OuO329 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-OOZCB) Ref: (a) DODINST 1304.22 Encl: (1) BCNR File #01396-00 with microfiche service record The following p.rovides comment and recommendation on former 1. Petty Officer initial enlistment into the Navy was ay she signed an agreement and 3. on 1 June 1987. statement of understanding that by electing...