Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01431-02
Original file (01431-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT O F  THE  NAVY 

BOARD  FOR  C O R R E C T I O N  O F   NAVAL RECORDS 

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N  DC  2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

JRE 
Docket No.  01431-02 
20 October 2003 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the 
United States Code, section 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 16 October 2003.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by the Board consisted 
of your application, together with all material submitted in 
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, 
regulations and policies.  In addition, the Board considered the 
advisory opinion furnished by Chief of Naval Operations dated 9 
September 2003, a copy of which is attached, and your rebuttal 
thereto. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was 
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material 
error or injustice.  In this connection, the Board substantially 
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. 
In addition, the Board was not persuaded that your digestive 
disorder was incurred in or aggravated by your service.  It 
noted that as there were no provisions for the disability 
retirement of enlisted service members prior to 1 October 1949, 
the effective date of the Career Compensation Act of 1949, you 
would not have qualified for disability retirement even if you 
had been unfit for duty at the time of your discharge. 

In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied.  The 
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished 
upon request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such 
that favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have 
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and 
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by 
the Board.  In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that 
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official 
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

OFFICE  OF  THE  SECRETARY 

1000  NAVY PENTAGON 

From:  Secretary, Board of Decorations and Medals 
To: 

WASHINGTON.  D.C.  20350-1000 

-sm  - 

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records 

Subj:  REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF EX-- 

165 0 
Ser NDBDM/0672 
9 September 2003 

Ref: 

(a) BCNR ltr dtd 24 May 02 
(b) SECNAVINST l65O.lG 

Encl :  (1) BCNR Pile 

(2) Service Record 

1 .   AS requested by reference (a), the following advisory opinion is submitted and 
enclosures (1) and (2) are returned. 

2.  The Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals reviewed Mr. -petition 
for a Purple Heart.  Based upon the information provided by him and information 
contained in his service record and VA claims file, he is not entitled to the Purple 
Heart. 

3.  To be eligible for the Purple Heart, a World War I1 veteran must have been wounded 
records 
as a direct result of enemy action.  There is no indication in- 
that his shoulder injury resulted directly from enemy action onboard USS Hancock on 
January 21, 1945. 

4.  Per reference (b), in the absence of adequate information in service and medical 
records,,- 
knowledge of his injury and the circumstances surrounding the incident in which his 
injury occurred.  These statements should include the full name of the eyewitness, 
current contact inforrnation, and relationship to Mr.-at 
incident. 

may submit sworn affidavits from two eyewitnesses who  have personal 

the time of the 

5 .   The additional inforrnation submitted by Mr.-n 
However the statements do not provide sufficient detail as required in paragraph 4 
above.  Specifically the statements must be sworn affidavits.  The eyewitnesses should 
discuss their personal knowledge of his injury (e.g. the nature of the injury and how 
it occurred) and the circumstances of January 21, 1945 during whic 
says he 
was injured.  Finally these statements should include current c o n t ~ ? S m ~  
including pll Y..  nur~lb.-r and zy-_ific relationship to '-nn 

June 26, 2002 is noted. 

January 21, 1945. 

. . 

may submit required sworn affidavits to the Navy  Liaison Office, Navy 

Personnel Command  (Pers-313E), Room 5409, 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63132 for 
further research and direct reply to him. 

6.  Finally it shoxld be noted that National Personnel Records Center made an earlier 
determination of -. 

Purple Heart eligibility on August 11, 1989.  This 

was found in his service records.  The determination at that time was Mr. 

as not entitled to the Purple Heart. 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00549-01

    Original file (00549-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07440-00

    Original file (07440-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 X 0 S CRS Docket No: 7440-00 5 December 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 30 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. Naval Operations has reviewed subject man's case for eligibility determination for the Purple...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03551-00

    Original file (03551-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 3551-00 25 September 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction-of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. considered your application on 25 Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, September...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02593-02

    Original file (02593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Our most recent reply is the Purple Heart Medal is not awarded for Combat Without the required two eyewitness statements to forwarded as enclosure (2). if he can provide the required two As previously stated, records fail to Without these : _. . ’ served in the Marine Corps, the During the perio Purple Heart was authorized for award to those who were wounded .as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United or injured States or an opposing armed force of a foreign county in which the.Armed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07733-00

    Original file (07733-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of his service and medical records, and the records at this Headquarters fails to reveal any documentation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059757C070421

    Original file (2001059757C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06007-00

    Original file (06007-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your application on 27 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 9 April 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04968-00

    Original file (04968-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 9 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. of the officers and enlisted Marines who were assigned to his former unit by requesting copies of the unit rosters for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05566-01

    Original file (05566-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 July 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065950C070421

    Original file (2001065950C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his military records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action. The applicant's statement without supporting official documentation is not sufficient to grant his request for award of the Purple Heart.