NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09537-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09545-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09551-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Contained in your record is a signed probation until May 1965. and witnessed statement, dated 15 June 1964, that states as follows: disrespect and five...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09552-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board found that you were appropriately discharged by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction for your conviction by civil...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09562-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 9562-02 4 February 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject’s widow, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09563-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This statement identified him as a participant in the SBP Children only coverage, and he took no action to enroll his spouse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09571-02
1552 (b) SECNAVINST 1910.4B Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record I. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 11 August 1969. that his naval record be 2. current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b) and its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09591-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09593-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09595-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Petitioner also Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN CASE OF voluntarily dismissed his lawsuit in the District Court and his appeal in the Ninth Circuit. There is no record of error or injustice in petitioner’s navy records.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09598-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel, a copy of which is enclosed. Therefore we do not support his petition wit1 As indicated in reference (b), Ex-Chief Petty Officer 3. * P * Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF after his discharge, Ex-Chief Petty requested reinstatement in March, 1965.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09602-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09603-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09605-02
Pursuant to the provisi filed enclosure (1) with thi corrected to show entitled dependents. (2), the Board concluded CONCLUSION Upon review and consider; (2), contents of enclosure 1 following corrective action In of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval r rd be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was a y 2000. Pursuant to Section 6 Records (32 Code of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09607-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. reenlistment code was correctly assigned as it reflected your overall performance during this period of active service and the fact that you were not recommended for either retention or advancement. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09615-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction df Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. The punishment imposed was forfeitures of $275 per month for two months and 45 days of restriction and extra duty On 22 April 1982 you were counseled concerning your past performance and warned that further misconduct could result in processing for a less than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09618-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 25 January 1971 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of unsuitability due to a character and behavior disorder and a defective attitude. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09619-02
A three-member panel of m e Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09626-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS I 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 9626-02 15 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 5730 Pers 913 of 13 May 2003 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09631-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to allow him the opportunity to earn reserve retirement. of the anniversary years ending on 17 August 2002 he has been credited with 15 years of qualifying service. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's b. naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09632-02
A three-member panel o$ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Although the documents concerning your separation processing are not contained in your records, it is clear that you were processed for separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to your failure to disclose pre-service medical treatment and diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09663-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 9663-02 4 December 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09667-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ‘ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 9667-02 4 December 2002 From: Chairman, Board To: Secretary of the I rr Correction of Naval Records vY Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S. . 1552 Encl : (1) DD Form 14 (2) CMC Msg R (3) Subject ’s nav w/attachments 319512 SEP 02 record Pursuant to the provis 1. filed enclosure (1) with th corrected to show promott ns of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09673-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09675-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09689-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09694-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an following corrective action. and especially in light of the injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09696-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09706-02
Pursuant to the filed enclosure (1) with th corrected to show entitled dependents. The Board, consisting Petitioner’s allegations of regulations, determined th available evidence of reco enclosures, naval records, * Messrs. Frankfurt, Leeman, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed ‘or and injustice on 3 December 2002 and, pursuant to its the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the d applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09709-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kim, McPartlin, and Nicholson, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09721-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Medical Officer Multiyear Special Pay (MSP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Haney, and Beckett, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09726-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 11 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) APPLICATION a. Petitioner does not claim factual innocence or any legal error in the findings or sentence of his special...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09740-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), 1. commissioned officer in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by transferring retirement points from the excess in a qualifying year into a nonqualifying year, or in the alternative, that he be retroactively transferred to the inactive status list so that he can qualify for reserve retirement in the future. is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09753-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 9753-02 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that the enlistment of 11 June 2002 is in paygrade E3. Pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09758-02
JLP: ddj Docket No: 9758-02 22 Janaury 2003 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 From: Chairman, Board To: Secretary of the 1 )r Correction of Naval Records vY Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S. . Pursuant to the provis filed enclosure (1) with th corrected to sho entitlemel compl Bonus based on the Ins of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be to a ion of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09762-02
Pursuant to the pro filed enclosure (1) with t corrected to show promo ), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be when first eligible. The Board, consistin Petitioner’ s allegations of regulations, determined th reco available evidence of enclosures, naval records, 3. Pursuant to Section Records (32 Code of Fede present at the Board ’s record of the Board ’s 6( ) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09763-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code’ other than the RE-4 code he received on 17 July 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Frankfurt and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09764-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 9764-02 15 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09768-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 9768-02 4 December 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisti enclosures, naval records, 3. consideraton of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the the RECOMMENDATION: s naval That Petitioner ’ 17...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09783-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board thus concluded that the administrative discharge boards and the discharge authority had a sufficient basis to reach different conclusions...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09788-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09794-02
Your allegations of error and ed in accordance with administrative applicable to the proceedings of this edures aterial considered by the Board consisted of ether with all material submitted in support ecord and applicable statutes, regulations scientious consideration of the entire d that the evidence submitted was ish the existence of probable material at during your enlistment 29 April 1997. ou enlisted in the Navy on d to disclose that you had been a frequent on 26 June 1998 you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09801-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09807-02
Documentary material considered by the Bocird consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was modified and on 11 January 1973 you received a general discharge by reason of unfitness due to substandard personal behavior. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09809-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. When informed of the recommendation, you elected to On 29 September 2001 At that time, you The offenses included waive the right to present your case to an administrative After review by the discharge authority, the Since you have been treated no differently than the Board could not find an error or The names and Applicable regulations require the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09813-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09826-02
c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), PERS-80, the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office having cognizance over active and reserve officer career progression matters, has recommended that Petitioner's request to remove his failure of selection by the FY 03 Naval Reserve Line Commander Selection Board be disapproved. e. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), Pers-911, the NPC office having cognizance over Naval Reserve personnel administration, has commented to the effect...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09833-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09834-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Mimer and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations’ of error and injustice on 18 December 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. After Petitioner had failed of selection by the FY 2002 Captain Selection Board, the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board directed removal of a fitness report. Captai Captain bove-Zone...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09868-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to (LSRB) for UIC 0763A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cat-on, Lippolis, and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...