NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09872-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged on 14 February 1986 with an other than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09878-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Although the discharge documentation is not filed in the service record, the Board presumed that you were diagnosed with a personality disorder,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09888-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the period from 29 March 2002 to 18 April 2002 is reflected as regular duty vice accrued leave. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Morgan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09904-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 9904-02 4 February 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09911-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 FC Docket No: 09911-02 21 April 2003 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, recharcterization of his discharge under other than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09924-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, George, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09933-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03U0564 8 Aug 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR case...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09957-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 TRG From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To : Docket No: 9957-02 6 August 2003 Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected, in effect, to show that his separation program...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09968-02
Petitioner completed 20 years of qualifying service for reserve retirement at the end of his anniversary year on 21 April 1995. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by transferring a. sufficient retirement points from the excess over 50 in qualifying years to make the anniversary years ending 21 April 2002 and 21 April 2002 qualifying for reserve retirement. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09973-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09974-02
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, per reference The petitioner was participating in the officer program at the time 5. of reenlistment, therefore the member is not eligible for the remaining zone "A" entitlement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09976-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2003. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You were found unfit for duty by the Physical Evaluation Board, acting for the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09980-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09982-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory N130D1/03U0297 of 17 April 2003, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. petition Petty Office 3. on 25 August 2000.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09991-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the PERSUPP DET (Personnel Support Detachment) Little Creek Virginia message 0813 15Z JUL 87, Subject: Rtn (return) Absentees ICO (in case of) Petitioner and. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Pfeiffer and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09993-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. and denied your claim for Although the Board was sympathetic to your situation, it was unable to conclude that you did not jump out a police wagon as alleged, or that your injuries were incurred in the line of duty, and not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09994-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 9994-02 20 December 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, George, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10018-02
10018-02 3 October 2003 From: To : Sub j : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy - FORMER ma-- 315-02-0216; REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was restored to active duty to undergo surgical procedures on his spinal column, or, in the alternative, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10050-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2003 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In response to reference (a), we have reviewed enclosure (1).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10057-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and McBride, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 17 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10070-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the with dependent rate. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Grover, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10104-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board found that your unauthorized absence of 107 days and prior NJP clearly warranted an undesirable discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10106-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY IARO FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 10106-02 11 December 2002 From: Chairman, Board To: Secretary of the 1 ar Correction of Naval Records ‘VY Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S . Pursuant to the filed enclosure (1) with th promot’ corrected to show Ins of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be when first eligible. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10107-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Haney, and Beckett, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10108-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Morgan, Agresti, and Roberts, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 May 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It was Navy policy at that time to issue a general discharge to service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10121-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2003. The Board found that you underwent a pre-enlistment physical examination on 27 March 1995, and denied having a history of “Rupture/Hernia”. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10126-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS I 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 FC Document No: 10126- 02 28 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: EVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF iUmUINII~IIflIfhIhIIIIEUiIIiihhjUIhii~iiqimU~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Petitioner’s conduct and overall trait averages were 3.25 and 3.2 respectively at the time of his discharge. Accordingly, the Board concludes that relief in the form...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10142-02
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 8 November 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. letters do not overshadow or otherwise negate the evaluations of Again, those Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10143-02
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board dated 15 November 2002, opy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. VIRGINIA 22 D 194.2 102 Y 7 C/’ y 3 -L- .a IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB NOV 1 5 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10147-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(TAR), vice USN. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Goldsmith, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10149-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for prior duty station. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and McBride, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10171-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Multiyear Special Pay (MSP) when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10183-02
You were again convicted by SPCM on 11 October 1956 of larceny and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months, a $60 forfeiture of pay, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD). On 21 October You were sentenced to a $30 forfeiture of pay You were sentenced to confinement at hard Your allegations of error and The BCD However, on' by civil authorities ,on 23 On 11 January 1957 you were convicted by SPCM of the foregoing period of UA and sentenced to a $330 forfeiture of pay, On 3...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10188-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Although the request for discharge is not in your record, it appears that you subsequently requested an other than honorable discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10190-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 3 May 1995, you requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions to escape trial by court martial for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10192-02
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 28 September 1985, the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10194-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10197-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. imposed was reduction to On 11 March and again on 5 May 1959 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of two periods of unauthorized absence (UA) totalling three days and breaking restriction. January 1961 the discharge authority then directed an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness due to frequent involvement of a discreditable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10203-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. from your appointed place of duty and two periods of unauthorized absence confinement at hard labor for 30 days and a $298 forfeiture of pay- Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement of a discreditable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10210-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Subsequently, you were notified of pending separation action by reason of unsuitability due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10212-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required wher Nevertheless, the Board concluded these On 29 April 1992 your On 4 June 1992 the It further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10215-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and McBride, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 17 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 1021502 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was authorized BAH...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10223-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10232-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 31 August and again on 28 December 1966 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on two occasions for a total of two days of unauthorized absence (UA). As a result of this misconduct, that the previously approved undesirable discharge be executed, and on 3 January 1969 you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10238-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 5326. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10245-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation was approved and on 1 June 2001 you received an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10247-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10250-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Accordingly, on 13 November 2001, the discharge authority disapproved your request for retention in a noncombatant status but directed an honorable discharge by reason of "conscientious objectorn. It is clear from the regulations that the Navy Personnel Command was authorized to direct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10251-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10272-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...