DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No:
2 July 2003
9551-02
:
.to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 July 2003.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 31 May 1962 at age 18.
During the
period from 20 December 1962 until 26 March 1964, you received
Your offenses were
nonjudicial punishment on five occasions.
three periods of unauthorized absence totaling about three days,
making a false official statement,
of disobedience.
Based on the foregoing record, you were processed for an
In connection with this processing,
administrative discharge.
you elected to waive the right to have your case heard by an
administrative discharge board.
commanding officer recommended a suspended undesirable discharge.
On 11 May 1964 the discharge authority directed an undesirable
discharge, but suspended the discharge for a probationary period
of one year.
Subsequently, you were an unauthorized absentee on 1 and 2 June
On 2 June 1964, you acknowledged you had been placed on
1964.
Contained in your record is a signed
probation until May 1965.
and witnessed statement, dated 15 June 1964, that states as
follows:
disrespect and five instances
On 16 April 1964, your
I was home on leave with my parents when they received
a letter from the Chief of Naval Personnel regarding
the suspended undesirable discharge awarded on 11 May
I was aware of the aforesaid discharge prior to
1964.
my unauthorized absence on 1 June 1964.
desire that the suspended undesirable discharge in my
case be vacated and executed as soon as possible.
It is my
A report from the
The undesirable discharge was issued on 19 June 1964.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, limited
education, and your contention that you have become an
upstanding, hardworking citizen.
The Board found that these
factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge given the frequency of your
misconduct, violation of probation, and your request for
discharge while in a probationary status.
Federal Bureau of Investigation shows that you have been
convicted of various offenses over the years since your
discharge, most recently in 2001 when you were convicted of
driving under the influence of alcohol.
your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
The Board concluded that
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00632-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. CNP further directed that you be advised that you were being placed in a probationary status for a period of 12 months and that the CO was authorized to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07433-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In connection with this processing, you acknowledged that separation could result in an undesirable discharge (UD), waived the right to have your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00740-09
Naval - Records, sitting in executive session, considered your |... application on 28 October 2009. On 13 October 1964, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to unfitness. by the Board... .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01092 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 October 1965, you were convicted by a SPCM of being UA for 113 days.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00347-99
You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for four months, forfeitures of $55 per month for four months and a bad conduct discharge. Thereafter, the commanding officer recommended an You were so discharged on An enlisted The Chief of Naval The board concluded The Board noted your contentions that you had an NJPs and convictions by four summary courts-martial and a In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02417-09
“RK three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 2010. You were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00712-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 9 April 1964, you were returned to military authorities after being in a UA status for about 120 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03204-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Subsequently, there was a two day period of Prier to A special court-martial convened on 10 April 1961 and convicted you of two periods of unauthorized absence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11288-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30 March 1965. A special court-martial convened...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06118-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 7 June 1966 the command recommended you for an undesirable discharge due to the civil conviction but also recommended that the discharge be...