Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09763-02
Original file (09763-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

Docket No: 9763-02
22 January 

2003

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

60
(1)
(2)

10 

U.S.C. 1552

DD Form 149
Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to
show that he was assigned a reenlistment code’ other than the RE-4 code he received on 17
July 2001.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Frankfurt and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s
allegations of error and injustice on 9 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The 
of error and injustice finds as follows:

Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

C. Petitioner served on active duty in the Navy from 30 May to 17 July 2001, when he

was discharged by reason of his failure to meet procurement medical standards because of
symptomatic flat feet. He was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. He states, in effect, that
although he has had flat feet for years, the problem he had with his feet while in the Navy
was caused by shoes that were too small for his feet.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that
Petitioner has not demonstrated that his discharge was erroneous; however, it does not believe
he should bear the stigma associated with a reenlistment code of RE-4. Accordingly, the
Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s naval 

record be corrected to show that he was assigned a

reenlistment code of RE-3E on 17 July 2001.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board
on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

nor_ W. DEAN PFEIFFER

Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07119-02

    Original file (07119-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 25 September 7119-02 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: Encl: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07160-01

    Original file (07160-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a more favorable reenlistment code than the RE-4 code he received on 22 March 1995. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01181-09

    Original file (01181-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 1181-09 5 March 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Te: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting to change the RE-4 reenlistment code that was assigned on 29 January...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09678-05

    Original file (09678-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJNDocket No: 09678-0512 September 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj REVIEW NAVAL OF RECORDRef: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his reenlistment code.2 The Board consisting reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07121-08

    Original file (07121-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the RE-4 reentry code assigned on 9 August 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. =—eGypr gay 2nd ne reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on January 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08282-02

    Original file (08282-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment code other than the RE-4 code he received on 24 May 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Frankfurt and Pfeiffer, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 9 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10408-06

    Original file (10408-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received a reentry code that will permit him to reenlist. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 January 2007, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00105-07

    Original file (00105-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected that he was assigned a reentry code of “RE-3 or lower”, and that he did not fail procurement medical or physical standards. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 26 June 2006. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 27 July 2006, he was discharged by reason of erroneous...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08365-02

    Original file (08365-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that ‘he was assigned a reenlistment code other than the RE-4 code he received on 23 July 2002. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Frankfurt and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06862-02

    Original file (06862-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was discharged by reason of Secretarial Authority, and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-1. Contrary to counsel noted to have pes planus during examinations conducted both before and after she enlisted. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of...