DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No:
19 December 2002
9794-02
This is in
referen
naval record pursu
States Code,
Secti
to your application for correction of your
t to the provisions of Title 10, United
of the Board for Correction of Naval
executive session, considered your
ember 2002.
Your allegations of error and
ed in accordance with administrative
applicable to the proceedings of this
edures
aterial
considered by the Board consisted of
ether with all material submitted in support
ecord and applicable statutes, regulations
scientious consideration of the entire
d that the evidence submitted was
ish the existence of probable material
at
during your enlistment
29 April 1997.
ou enlisted in the Navy on
d to disclose
that you had been a frequent
on 26 June 1998 you received a
ubsequently,
reason of misconduct due to fraudulent
ime, you were assigned a reenlistment code
code is required by regulatory guidance and
1s who are separated by reason of
The Board thus concluded that there is no
your reenlistment code. Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
ed upon request.
ether your characterization of
on should be changed, since you did
n
and you have not exhausted your
by applying to the Naval Discharge Review
Board.
Documentar
your application,
thereof, your nava
and policies.
After careful and c
record, the Board
insufficient to es
error or injustice.
The Board found th
On 12 June 1998 you
processing, you fai
user of marijuana.
enlistment.
of RE-4.
An RE-4 reenlistmen
error or injustice i
application h
of the panel
The Board di
administrative
remed
You
may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached
Board (NDRB).
DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action ca not be taken.
Board reconsider it
evidence or other
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when (applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
decision upon submission of new and material
m'atter not previously considered by the Board.
You are entitled to have the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09527-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 9527-02 19 December 2002 referen This is in naval record pursu Secti States Code, A three-member pan injustice were rev regulations and pr Board. to your application for correction of your t to the provisions of Title 10, United of the Board for Correction of Naval executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and ember 2002. ed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03649-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, to ether with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board for the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 19 June 1998 at age 17. At that time you waived your right to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10211-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your _naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01355-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08352-02
Your allegations of error and ed in accordance with administrative dures applicable to the proceedings of this aterial considered by the Board consisted of with all material submitted in support ecord and applicable statutes, regulations scientious consideration of the entire nd that the evidence submitted was the existence of probable material nlisted in the Navy on 13 January 2000. ed a written request for an other than n order to avoid trial by court-martial for om 4 April to 26 May 2000....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02881-02
Shortly thereafter, on 28 April 1998, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of weight control failure. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these Regarding your contention that you elected your right to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), the Board noted that when an individual is being processed for separation he is entitled to request an ADB due to weight control failure, Since you only if he has six or more years of active service....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04759-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contract required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05189-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together'with all material submitted in support Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03002-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged prior to the expiration of his term of active obligated service for misconduct and is not recommended for | retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00008-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...