Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09788-02
Original file (09788-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                             2 NAVY ANNEX

                                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                                 LCC:ddj
                                                                 Docket No:
                            9788-02
                                                                   12
February 2003






     From:   Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
          To:  Secretary of the Navy

           Subj:
            REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

            Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 11.52
                                      4
      End:  (1)  DD Form 149 w/attachments
            (2)  NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/037 of 10 January 2003
            (3)  Subject’s naval record

      1.   Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter
      referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
      requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
      to show advanced when first eligible.

      2.    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Taylor,
      reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11
      February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
      corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
      evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
      consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
      regulations and policies.

      3.    The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
      Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

         a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
      administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
      within the Department of the Navy.

         b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
      cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
      application has commented to the effect that the request has merit
      and warrants favorable action.

      CONCLUSION

      Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
      especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
      the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
      action.




                                                      Docket No: 9788-02

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show
that:

   a. Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-5 effective 16 September 2002.

   b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s
      naval record.

4.    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN      G. L. ADAMS
Recorder    Acting Recorder

5.    Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of
the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been
approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


          12 February 2003                         W. DEAN PFIEFFER
                                                   Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09788-10

    Original file (09788-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09788-06

    Original file (09788-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s constructive service date of ENSIGN (01) was calculated under SECNAVINST 1l20.5A of 14 May 1986 vice OPNAVINST 1120.11 of 29 December 2005.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Goldsmith, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09006-02

    Original file (09006-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09603-02

    Original file (09603-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10574-02

    Original file (10574-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kim, McPartlin, and Nicholson, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07038-02

    Original file (07038-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07042-02

    Original file (07042-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 7042-02 4 February 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09673-02

    Original file (09673-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09277-02

    Original file (09277-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to terminate recoupment of NROTC tuition debt. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10462-02

    Original file (10462-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating and advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s...