NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09233-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 9233-02 4 February 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09235-02
It is noted that the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Section, Personnel Management Support Branch, Personnel Management Division (MMSB-30) has placed a memorandum in your record amending the contested fitness report to show you should have been ranked among five officers, rather than six; and that you should be ranked fifth of five. Board. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation The petitioner contends that an administrative error 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09239-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) and changing his reenlistment code. In that (Petitioner) . Turning to the NJP, the Board agrees with the conclusion of JAM that it should be removed from Petitioner’s records since the record does not reflect that his enlistment was extended “with a view to trial.” In this regard,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09242-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the appliwble naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 May 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09262-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2003. When informed of the recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09274-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 19 March and 4 and 12 June 2003, copies of which are attached. c. The Bureau of Naval Personnel cannot arbitrarily change the ranking of a member on a “ double ranking ”.It is apparent the member ’s record was changed “Bupers subsequently mandated he provide a fitness report. The member ’s previous report for the period 8 December 1990 to 3 1 October 1991 ranked the member as 3 of 11,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09275-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 9275-02 4 February 2003 From: Chairman, Board fOr Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09276-02
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your lengthy period of UA which resulted in your request for discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09277-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to terminate recoupment of NROTC tuition debt. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09278-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 2001, and you were discharged by reason of physical disability on 1 February lo%, and recommended that you be discharged by reason of You accepted the findings of the PEB The Board concluded that in view of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09300-02
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 9300-02 26 November 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ?- L. ADAMS Acting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09305-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09312-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 19 October 1984 at age 18. However, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09317-02
9317-02 21 August 2003 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Review of naval record (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Marines considered for promotion for the CY 2001 Reserve Staff Noncommissioned Officer Selection Board were given only a 41.6% promotion opportunity when the Marine Corps guidelines guarantee a minimum of 60% opportunity for promotion to E-8. Inflation of the promotion zone is not listed as one of the reasons for remedial promotion nevertheless when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09320-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C’ Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the HM rating (NEC 8478). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09325-02
The record appears to indicate that you were confined during the period of 6 to 30 December 1999. Therefore it appears that although you were not an unauthorized absentee during this period, time lost since you were serving the confinement adjudged at the The names SCM. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09326-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be (HHGs) at government expense corrected to show entitlement to ship household goods incident to his transfer to the Permanent Disability Retired List (TDRL) was extended. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Kastner, allegations of error and injustice on 5 November 2002 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09335-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the total number of Lump Sum Leave (LSL) days sold is 13.5 vice 60.. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09338-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 9338-02 26 March 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09347-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs.. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09351-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E3 based on the completion of three years of JROTC.. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09354-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 November 1985 at age 18. On 10...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09357-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09361-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1070 CMT of 24 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09369-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. d. The member provided a Fitness Report Letter-Supplement with his petition for the report ending 30 March 1998. The letter is not signed by the reporting senior, and not submitted within two years after the ending date of the report.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09371-02
?ction of your LO of the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction #)f Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Bo-ird consisted of your application, together with all material sitbmitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of a l l official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to dumonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09381-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE N 4 V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 * TJR Docket No: 9381-02 15 August 2003 From: Chairman, Board for correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 26 March 1965 at age 17 for four years.4 At the time of enlistment, he had completed 11 years of formal education. Additionally, Petitioner served during the Vietnam War, and he served 40 months of his 48 month enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09384-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2003. You received NJP on 22 February 1992 for a 17 period of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded restriction and extra duty for 4 5 days and a $550 forfeiture of pay. However, the record does not reflect that any disciplinary action was taken for this period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09385-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record contains a substance abuse report dated 26 March 1986 which noted that you were recommended for an administrative separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09403-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09405-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2003. On dated 27 November 1992, at the expiration of your enlistment, you were honorably discharged and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09411-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 941 l-02 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that that the enlistment of 20 March 2002 is in paygrade E2 a. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09420-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Taylor, Tew and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 December 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Cap Captain Select Performance Evaluation Review Board Transfer fitness report from 990908 to 991113. subsequently selected for promotion USMC Captain Selection Board. and following the removal Capta he was selected for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09430-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09439-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2003. On 26 November 1999 you were notified of administrative separation action by reason of convenience of the government due to defective enlistment and induction and/or erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosed oppositional defiant disorder and alcohol dependency. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09442-02
At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Apparently, your record has been corrected to reflect this At that time, you had completed almost four years of About a year later, you received RE-3C reenlistment code may be However, the decision On 7 October 1998 you were The punishment imposed whether or not to grant a waiver is a matter within the sole discretion of recruiting authorities. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09446-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An average of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your discharge for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09449-02
On 28 March 1966 the discharge authority directed an undesirable discharge by reason of misconduct for the perpetration of a fraudulent induction and, on 6 April 1966, Petitioner was so discharged after only 22 days of service. current standards, he would not be discharged under other than honorable conditions if processed for fraudulent enlistment or homosexuality. the Veterans Administration be application was received by the Board Report of Proceedings be filed in disagrees with the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09453-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09471-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Morgan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09480-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Haney, and Beckett, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09483-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. The punishment imposed was restriction and extra duty for 45 days and an $844 forfeiture of pay, which was suspended for six months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09486-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Leeman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09492-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 8 June 1981 the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09500-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 11 January 2001 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of fraudulent entry due to the diagnosed PTSD and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09504-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09508-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. of review, on 16 December 1969 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09509-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Leeman, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09527-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 9527-02 19 December 2002 referen This is in naval record pursu Secti States Code, A three-member pan injustice were rev regulations and pr Board. to your application for correction of your t to the provisions of Title 10, United of the Board for Correction of Naval executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and ember 2002. ed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09534-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2003. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...