NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08365-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 4 January 2002 8365-01 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ----T- -- RI?%‘IEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08366-00
TO SUPPORT HIS REQUEST THE MEMBER PRESENTED TESTIMONY AND COPIES OF HIS V.A. THE RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT THE MEMBER HAD CHRONIC LEFT SHOULDER KNEE, AND FOOT PAIN THAT LIMITED HIS ACTIVITIES DUE TO THE ABOVE DIAGNOSES. THE TDRL EVALUATION INDICATES THAT SINCE PLACEMENT ON THE TDRL THE MEMBER HAS UNDERGONE A LEFT ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR IN OCTOBER 1998 BUT CONTINUES TO HAVE CHRONIC SHOULDER PAIN.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08368-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08369-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08376-00
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United (1) with this Board requesting that show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 code assigned on 13 July 2000 States Navy filed enclosure his record be corrected to . recommended for reenlistment and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. ardhis desire to The Board believes that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08381-00
The petitioner has offered absolutely no documentary that he missed only six hours of class Finally, while paragraph nine of enclosure (5) to evidence whatsoever to prove his allegations that his absences were due to medical reasons or that the report itself contains "false statements" (i.e., vice 60). The counseling entry meets the elements of a proper page 11 counseling in that it lists specific deficiencies and recommendations for corrective found, and states that Sergeant to make a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08381-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Continuoils Submarine Pay (CONSUB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. McPartlin, Pauling, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08383-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 December 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and especially in light of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08385-00
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were so separated on 17 June At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and Subsequently, the separation t:Lme you stated "I do not At that You desire a change in the reenlistment code so that you can again serve in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a cor:cection of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08388-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 2 1 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08395-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct and especially the special court-martial conviction for 47 days of unauthorized absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08398-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Our records indicate that the member’s BCNR directed corrections were completed prior to the FY-98 board. A review of the member’s master officer file and the record of proceedings for the FY-98 Active Duty Lieutenant Commander Chaplain Corps Promotion Selection Board, convened on 5 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08407-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Geisler, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08410-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Silberman, Shy, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08412-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Prograni when first eligible.. 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McPartlin, Pauling, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08414-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. recommend no change to the The petitioner and received the zone reenlisted on 09 August 1999 for four years "B" SRB maximum of $30K for the FC rate. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08420-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals who are discharged for homosexuality. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08431-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Exnicios, and Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08432-01
d. Petitioner was then advised that administrative separation action was being initiated by reasons of erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosis of alcohol dependence. Additionally, the applicable regulation requires the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of "erroneous entry-alcohol abuse. " That Petitioner's naval record be corrected'by issuing him a new DD Form 214 which reflects that he served on active duty from 8 February to 8 March...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08435-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for unauthorized absences totalling over three months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08437-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and and policies. The Board concluded that your discharge was proper and Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when there is a finding that an individual is at risk for self harm. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08438-00
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 1 February You then served 1991 for four years in the rate of SM2 (E-5). It indicates You were The DD Form 214 indicates At that time you were not RE-4, You contend, in effect, that you were improperly assigned the 4 reenlistment code because the performance evaluation shows that you were an SM2 and therefore, the high year tenure regulations did not apply in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08438-01
When you were divorced in November 1999 the court ordered you to furnish your former spouse with SBP coverage. In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct Petty Officer -record changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage category within one year of his divorce. Additionally, a member who refuses coverage for an eligible spouse in favor of children only category is prohibited from electing spouse coverage at a later date...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08443-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08448-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Dis 21th aes was to be commissioned on 01 Jun 00, he did not meet physical qualification standards until 14 Jul 00.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08453-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 8453-00 11 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement.. 2. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08455-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he received a “medical discharge”, vice a discharge by reason of a personality disorder. The Board also concludes that although it is clear that Petitioner unsuitable for service because of the effects of the adjustment disorder, he was not unfit to perform the duties of his rate by reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08456-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. Gilbert, McCormick, and Mr. Milner, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08457-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. may have been an increase in the severity of your condition following your discharge, which In addition, there ,bearing on the rating assigned by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08458-00
1070 JAM4 1 1 JUN 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) APPLICATION We are asked to provide an opinion 1. for the removal from his service record book (SRB) and his official military personnel file (OMPF) of all entries related to his non-judicial punishment (NJP) of 17 June 1994. on Petitioner's request _.- We recommend that the requested relief be denied. Petitioner, however, his record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08458-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. g. Petitioner was then advised that administrative separation action was being initiated by reasons of weight control failure as evidence by his failure of three PRT1s within a four year period. That Petitioner's naval record by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 15 August 1997, to RE-3T b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08463-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October 2001. The available records do not demonstrate that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder at that time, or more importantly, that you were unfit to perform the duties of your office, grade, rank or rating by reason of physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08468-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your bad conduct of It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08480-01
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 8480-01 14 March 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08488-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2001. injustice were reviewed in regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences totalled more than eight months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08490-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the date of rank and effective date of his SPOT promotion to lieutenant commander as 14 March 2000, the date he arrived at the SPOT billet, vice 6 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08492-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge on 4 March 1981. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08493-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2002. On 20 October 1995 you were notified that separation action was being initiated due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08505-00
1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlistment member of the United States Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 23 March 1971. considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08506-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 8506-00 27 March 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B”...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08507-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2002. The Board does not grant the naval flight officer (NFO) designator to an officer who has never held it, as they consider this a matter for cognizant naval authorities. He was promoted to the rank of Commander in November 2000 and has completed more than 18 years of qualifying service towards retirement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08509-00
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Shy and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 April 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They say the only action required of Petitioner to return to active duty or the Ready Reserve, if this correction is approved, is to request a Naval Reserve commission and submit a Ready Reserve service agreement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08512-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record < enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that three anniversary years are qualifying for reserve retirement. proficiency marks, and was awarded the Organized Reserve Medal, it appears that Petitioner probably attended drills during the period at issue. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08513-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he had 2 weeks Active Active Duty for Training (ACDUTRA) during January 1981 and that he had over 28 qualifying years of service toward his Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08514-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08517-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 25 September 2001 8517-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application injustice were reviewed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08534-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 8534-00 11 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0 Pills iiglagad pa pameessiaumappen: Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by showing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08536-01
A three-member panel of rhe Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, consitleretl your application 011 18 June 2002. I n addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientioi~s consideration of the entire record, h e Board found that the evidence subn~itted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or I n this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the co~nnients contained in ili.justice. This is an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08538-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 12 court- Prior to submitting this February 1974 your request was granted and your commanding officer was directed to issue you an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service. sufficient to warrant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08545-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.