DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FORCORRECTION OFNAJAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No:
7 June 2001
8385-00
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session; considered your
application on 5 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
\
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The record shows an extensive record of counseling
the Navy on 5 May 1987 at
The Board found that you enlisted in
age 18.
entries and comments concerning your
recruit training.
adjustment disorder.
Subsequently, you were diagnosed with an
:.nability to adapt while in
Based on the foregoing record, you were processed for an
administrative separation.
object to this separation."
authority directed an entry level separation by reason of entry
level performance and conduct.
1987.
were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
You were so separated on 17 June
At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and
Subsequently, the separation
t:Lme you stated
"I do not
At that
You desire a change in the reenlistment code so that you can
again serve in the Navy.
were under stress because your pregnant girlfriend tried to
commit suicide.
an RE-4 reenlistment code when an
reason of entry level performance and conduct.
been treated no differently than others in your situation, the
Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of
However, regulations require the assignment of
You state that you could not adjust and
ind:Lvidual is separated by
Since you have
the RE-4 reenlistment code.
The names and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstance:; of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a cor:cection of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincere:Ly,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executi.Je Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06642-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01476-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You On 24 January 2001 your commanding officer forwarded the separation action, to the discharge authority. supported the RE-4 reenlistment code due to your failure to adapt to the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04098-02
On 21 September 1987 a recruit aptitude board recommended an administrative separation. At that time you stated After review the separation "I do not and you were so separated on 1 October You state in your application that you are being denied employment as a Federal prison guard because of the RR-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03279-01
Concerning your abuse of alcohol you stated that It was also noted that you had previously been diagnosed The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 May 2000 at age 22. Based on the foregoing record, administrative separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment, a and alcohol abuse rehabilitation designated mental condition, Subsequently, the separation authority directed an failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04068-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03990-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found no evidence that the diagnosis of adjustment disorder was incorrect. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00941-10
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice: You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 25 July 2001. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change to your RE-4 reenlistment code given your NUP and diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01040-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00601-03
If your le A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. approved your separation and on that same day, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of e enlistment due to the diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04091-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 10 July 1997 at age 19. Subsequently, on 5 August 1997 you were...