NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08239-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) shows member served 3 years, 11 months and 29 days of active enlisted service and therefore is not entitled to E pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08247-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 June to 19 December 1996 and all related correspondence, a copy of which is at Tab A. Petitioner further impliedly requested removal of his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 01 Lieutenant Commander Staff Selection Board. Notwithstanding the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08250-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his date of rank in the grade of lieutenant as 19 August 1976 vice 20 May 1972. Counsel insisted that Petitioner’s lieutenant date of rank should be corrected as requested, to allow him to complete 30 years of service in fiscal year 2007. Accordingly, counsel requested, ’ in the event...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08253-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 3 1 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. d. e. f. g - Including paraphrased statements from the JAG manual investigations is precluded by reference (b) The JAG manual investigation was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08254-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has modified the contested fitness report for 1 September 1999 to 30 April 2000 by adding the revised reviewing officer comments dated 9 October deleting the nonconcurrence with the mark assigned in item H. 1 (evaluation of your responsibility as a reporting official). In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 5 November 2001, a copy of which is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08255-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. They were likewise unable to find that you were not given a chance to submit an “MRO [Marine reported on] worksheet” or that you were not given a chance to discuss your billet description with the reporting senior. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation 000425 to 000717 The petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08256-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank and effective date in the grade of captain she would have been assigned had she been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 00 Staff Captain Selection Board, vice the FY 01 Staff Captain Selection Board. The Board, consisting of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08257-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 1 November 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08260-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08261-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was permanently advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08264-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. signed the waiver believing that you did not have 18 years of active duty, you did not contest your release from active duty on 31 December 1999. you were issued ADSW orders to However, in these orders you were Since you Subsequently, you were informed that an error in your service computation had been made and that you actually had 18 years...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08265-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08266-01
and consideration enclosurt’ lllc I3Oiil-tl ot‘ all the evidence of record, ot‘ the existence finds ii11 and especially in light of the iiijiisticc warranting the Docket No: 8266-01 RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner ’s naval record he corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner ’s naval record. Records (32 present at the Board record of the Board Pursuant to Section 6(c) 01‘ the revised Procedures of the Board for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08269-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 8269-00 12 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 5311. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08270-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correct:~on of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that these factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of four NJP's, three...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08273-00
1552 ‘I*:I (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CMC memorandum 1000 MMEA of 27 February 2001 (3) Subject’s naval record 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 08 11. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08274-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs Dunn, Neuschafer, and Petitioner’s allegations of error and iIi_justice on 14 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 8274-01 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Recorder G4== G. L....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08279-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was not released from active duty on 30 June 2000 but that his current tour of active duty was extended. McCormick, Wiley, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08280-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08280-95
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 8280-95 8 May 2000 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy FORMER REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (4 0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) U.S.C. Many patients lost weight initially, lo-15 pounds but began to gain weight after 6 to 12 months of use, and commonly gained per year In his opinion, weight control was very difficult for those patients, and that “...it would take...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08282-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 13 November 2001, a copy of which is attached. They did recognize that even if the NJP remained in your record, the contested report could be removed on the basis of an error or injustice in the NJP. GUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-51 03 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB \ 3 YOY 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08283-01
You requested that your reenlistment code of RE-4 (not eligible for reenlistment without prior approval of the Chief of Naval Personnel) be changed. - physical disability) and a medical waiver, you could A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 December 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08285-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 13 November 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure ..: Y EPARTMENT OF THE NAV HEADGUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08286-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 27 March 2001 8286-W From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08295-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 8295-01 19 March 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-00
You requested correction of your record to show your voluntary resignation from the Naval Reserve on 30 June 1991, rather than involuntary discharge on 31 December 1994 by reason of two failures of selection to lieutenant commander. his in All members of the Ready Reserve, including IRR members, are 4. required by law to be considered by promotion selection boards, whether or not they are actively participating. It was during this time that he stopped active participation with his unit,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 8299-01 13 February 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08305-00
MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF MAJOR SMC adverse report at the time the report is prepared. 1610 MMER/PERB 6 ; OEC MU MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) TION IN THE CASE OF USMC (a) (b) DD Form 149 of 7 Sep 00 Ch l-6 Per 1. with three members present, MC0 161O.llC, the Performance Evaluation Review...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08305-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD BOARD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 8305-01 19 November 2001 : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, itl.justice on 14 November 2001 and, pursuant to its Petitioner’s allegations of error and regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08306-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Ref: (a) Title IO I1.S.C’. 1533 RECOMMENDATION: lhcket No: 8306-O 1 naval record 2057) dated 23 That Petitioner ’s Form Form (DD con~~~totl 10 SIKW VEAP escc~~~c’tl Iw a h/IC;lH Election MGIB retlects that he elected to participate in tlw PrograIn and conversion period, he corrected, Fehr-mry further rellects MC;113 I983 tll;~r I on I+-ograiii. Pursuant to Records (32 Code of present...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08308-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 15 November 2001, a copy of which is attached. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. .--- -----T- Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08309-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the reviewing officer’s certification from the fitness report for 3 May 1996 to 6 May 1997, a copy of which is at Tab A to enclosure (1). 1610 MMER/PERB ,6 NOV 23’1 From: To: Commandant of the Marine Corps Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 1610.11C Per the reference, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08310-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 13 March 2001 831040 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08314-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The advisory opinion reviewed the two physician evaluations submitted to the Board showing that you do not have a personality disorder. ” (Commanding Officer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08322-00
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service and your contention that your narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code are administrative errors because you served without any disciplinary actions. Accordingly, your application has been This disorder constituted a physical the narrative reason for separation is an RE-3P reenlistment code was Given all the circumstances of The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08323-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. N32/6110 of 20 November opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08325-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a more favorable reenlistment code than the RE-4 code he received on 20 April 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08329-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 17 July 2001 8329-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08334-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 6 August 2001 8334--00 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary *1_ of,$.&J Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08335-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, changes in his reason for separation and reenlistment code. In support of that request, he submitted the 1999 psychological assessment. However, in 1995, while in the navy, Petitioner's records do support the in-service diagnosis of personality disorder for the reasons noted above.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08338-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A recruit performance record entry reflects that on 13 March 1998, you failed battle stations for the third time.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08343-00
2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC 20380-1775 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1070 JAM7 1 5 AUG 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS SERGEAN ERY MC (BCNR) APPLICATION Our The 17 Background. We are again asked to provide an opinion on Petitioner's request for the removal from his official military personnel file (OMPF) of the 17 December 1996 letter from his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08344-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08344-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his enlistment of 23 January 1986 into the Naval Reserve and the Delayed Enlistment Program (DEP) does not count for pay purposes. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 November 2001 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08349-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 8349-00 12 June 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08350-01
The attached letter from the Assistant General Counsel (Manpower and Reserve Affairs), dated 26 November 2001, directed that your case be reconsidered for the purpose of addressing your entitlement to purely equitable relief. However, they noted that the recommendation for relief in that case actually was not based on equitable grounds, but no Secretarial authority for the delay of the applicant ’s promotion rather a finding that since had been obtained when his projected promotion date...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08354-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 8354-00 3 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Shy and allegations of error and injustice on 27 September determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08355-01
In this regard, the E3oard noted that the VA assigns disability ratings without regard to the issue of fitness for military duty, whereas the military departments rate only those conditions which render a service member unfit for duty. The Board concluded that had the PEB had found your arthritis to be unfitting as of 1 October 1994, it is unlikely that you would have received a substantial rating for that condition, because substantial deductions would have been taken from the rating for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08356-00
The advisory opinion opined that second hand marijuana smoke or Vicks inhaler would not cause a false positive the use of a Further, the opinion found that the other listed urinalysis. medications provided in the statements by you and Dr. H would not, alone or in any combination, produce false positive results for methamphetamine, amphetamine or marijuana with the testing procedures utilized by the Navy Drug Screening Laboratories. In the subject case the Navy Drug Screening Laboratory...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08360-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 8360-00 25 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement and Navy...