Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08443-00
Original file (08443-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 8443-00
20 March 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 8 15 of 13 February 2001, a copy of
which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.  The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAW  l  LRSOWNEL COMMAND
DRIVE

INTLDRITV  

5720  

YlLLllDTOW  

TN 

t80$5-0000

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref:

SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 07

(a)
(b) MILPERSMAN 1510-020
(c) NAVADMIN 
(d) MILPERSMAN 1160-100

176/00

Dee 00

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

a.

The petitioner reenlisted for six years on 07 July  2000
The petitioner received a zone "A" SRB for this

prior to attending  COMMUNICATIONS INFORMATION SYSTEM  training NEC
9303.
reenlistment.

b.

Reference (b) did not list NEC 9303 on the Career Schools

List (CSL) at the time of the petitioner's reenlistment.

C .

Reference (c), released on 12 July 2000, added NEC 9303 on

Per reference (d), automatic advancement is authorized

the CSL.
if the "C" school or "C" school package the service member
completed was listed on the Career Schools List (CSL) in effect on
the date of reenlistment.

d.

The petitioner requests automatic advancement upon the

completion date of 9303 "C" school training via the

  STAR 

progrdm.

The petitioner completed COMMUNICATION INFORMATION SYSTEM
Per reference   (c),’ this

COURgE (NEC 9303) on 28 September 2000.
course of instruction was listed on the CSL at the time the
However, petitioner did not
petitioner completed training.
initially reenlist under the STAR program, because at the time of
reenlistment, NCE 9303 was not eligible to receive benefits under
the STAR program.

f.

Naval Personnel Command cannot provide information

pertaining to subsequent STAR  
NAVADMIN has been released.
not have been counseled concerning reference (c) prior to his
reenlistment.
grounds to change the members reenlistment contract to reflect the
benefits of the STAR program.

NAVADMIN's CSL until after the
Therefore the petitioner could have

The petitioner's hindsight is not sufficient

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

i

recommend petitioner's record remain as

In view of the above,

2.
is.
3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(1) is returned.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by
Enclosure

(BCNR) only.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01

    Original file (03457-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02

    Original file (06172-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05176-01

    Original file (05176-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reference (a), recommend...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04573-01

    Original file (04573-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05735-01

    Original file (05735-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06174-02

    Original file (06174-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 5he Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07191-02

    Original file (07191-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The petitioner were issued orders on 20 February 2001 from the Enlisted Personnel Management Management Center New Orleans, LA to The return to active duty for disenrollment from petitioner reenlisted on 10 July 2001 for six years and received a zone "B" SRB entitlement for NEC 3354. the' NROTC Program. d. The petitioner request to receive all SRB installments and "C" School for the previous reenlistment prior to entering guaranteed the BOOST Program. However, the member is In view of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04624-06

    Original file (04624-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/459 dated 21 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01109-01

    Original file (01109-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive his,automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second Class effective the reenlistment as part of the STAR program benefit.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07709-02

    Original file (07709-02.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL...