DEPARTMENT OF THE. NAVY
BOARD FOR
CORFECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 8488-00
4 June 2001
i%pplication for correction of your
conscientio.ls consideration of the entire
'[our allegations of error and
acczordance with administrative
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 May 2001.
injustice were reviewed in
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 3
January 1969 at age 19.
five nonjudicial punishments.
absences totalling 25 days.
A special court-martial convened on 6 August 1971 and you were
The
found guilty of unauthorized absences totalling 230 days.
court sentenced you to confinement at hard labor for five months,
forfeitures of $90 per month for five months, and a bad conduct
conduct discharge on 7 January
discharge.
1972.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
due to the fact that your unauthorized absences
totalled more
than eight months.
about three years, you were the
The Board also noted that during a period of
The record reflects that you received
The offenses included unauthorized
You received the bad
as your youth and
subjec:t of six disciplinary
actions, including a conviction by a special court-martial.
Based on the foregoing, the Board concluded that no change to the
Accordingly, your application has been
discharge is warranted.
denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
of your case are such that
It is regretted that the circumstances
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or.other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02271-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative theproceedings of this regulations and procedures applicable to Board. together with all material submitted in support your application, thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03752-00
A special court-martial convened on 8 January 1974 and you were found guilty of unauthorized absences totalling 206 days. The Board also noted that during a period of less than three years, The record reflects that you received two However, the Board concluded that these The offenses included unauthorized you were the subject of three DEPARTMENT OF TH;E NAVY linary 1. to the discharge action8~A?Pli~~ti&~! Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02849-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Subsequently, you received three more nonjudicial The offenses included unauthorized absences You received the bad conduct discharge on 22 However, the Board concluded that these factors were In its review of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05874-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization The record reflects that you received four nonjudicial The offenses included unauthorized absences You received the bad conduct discharge on 24...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03947-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, while the administrative discharge recommendation was being processed, you began another series of unauthorized absences. During the period 25 April to 1 July 1980 you were an unauthorized absentee on three occasions totaling about 35 days.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08642-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,. considered your application on 30 May 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error cor.rection of an official naval Ior injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00676-01
A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2001. You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months, forfeitures of $50 per month for two months, and a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03847-02
10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The court sentenced you to confinement at hard labor for five months, forfeitures of $91 per month for five months, reduction in pay grade, and a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00382-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04900-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. included an unauthorized absence of 24 days and drunk and disorderly conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...