Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08534-00
Original file (08534-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS

Docket No: 8534-00
11 June 2001

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0 Pills iiglagad pa pameessiaumappen:

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an
enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by
showing that he was not reduced in rate at the 18 August 1999
nonjudicial punishment (NJP).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Morgan, Shy, and Mazza,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30
May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and

regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

c. Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy on 7 June 1996 after
about ten years of prior active service.

d. Petitioner, then served well and without disciplinary
incident until 18' August 1999 when he received NJP from his
Officer-In Charge (OIC), a lieutenant commander, for failure to
obey a lawful order, dereliction of duty, and making false
statements. The punishment imposed consisted of a forfeiture of
$442 which was suspended for six months, restriction for four
days, and a reduction in rate from AG1 (E-6) to AG2 (E-5).
e. An advisory opinion from the Deputy Assistant Judge
Advocate General (Criminal Law), dated 22 May 2001, recommends
that relief be granted since an OIC in the rank of lieutenant
commander or below cannot reduce an enlisted servicemember at
NJP.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable
action. The Board agrees with the advisory opinion that
Petitioner should be restored to AG1 and that the reduction in
rate should be deleted from the NJP of 18 August 1999.

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an
injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that at
the NIP of 18 August 1999, Petitioner received punishment of a

suspended forfeiture of $442 and restriction for four days, vice
the punishment actually imposed on that date.

b. That the record be further corrected to show that
Petitioner was never reduced from AG1 to AG2, and has served
continuously as a AG1 since he was first advanced to that rate.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner’s
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of
this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file

maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Fo~ W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00260-00

    Original file (00260-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    investigation the this allegation of religious discrimination against (Petitioner) by his chain of command . his,request for Courts- Thus, (Petitioner) does not have a . the same degree of assistance in preparing his mitigation request as did Further, it does appear that he did make some efforts to do more than was absolutely required in the normal performance of his duties, Petitioner's actions.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06307-05

    Original file (06307-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    CONFINEMENT ORDERED FROM (YYMMMDD( 40 CHANGE E1~OS TO (YYMMMDCi~ 8. REPORT OF ACTION [1 1). In view of the member’s reduction in rate being set aside we recommend the following be deleted from block- 43 of the report in question: “Evaluation submitted due to member’s reduction in rate”.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01685-01

    Original file (01685-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 1685-01 20 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: IT 2 (AW) tigate, Us NF Regan REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Also, the power to set aside an executed )¢G5-0/ punishment should ordinarily be exercised only within a reasonable time after the punishment has been executed. The Commanding Officer, Helicopter...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00256-02

    Original file (00256-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an 1. enlistment member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by expunging all references to the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) of 3 May 2000. \\reduction to next inferior pay grade,, should be Since there is a remaining punishment, the Board However, Concerning the performance evaluation, the Board believes...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07426-00

    Original file (07426-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HQMC Memo 1070 JAM4 of 13 Feb 01 (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that on 22 December 1999 he was reduced to PFC (E-2) vice PVT (E-l). The Board is aware that commanding officers at NJP only RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06245-00

    Original file (06245-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) awarded him on 6 May 1998 and the competency review board proceedings that reduced him in rank. CONCLUSION: The Board concurs with the advisory opinion that the NJP In this regard, there is Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06322-00

    Original file (06322-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    is no page 13 entry dated 23 January 2000 in the record, but only the counseling entries of 1, provided a handwritten letter from a representative of the telephone company which stated that installation of her phone should have been completed on 18 February 2000, but was not. 2000....t1 h. Petitioner received NJP on 23 February 2000 for failure to 2 obey the order in the 31 January 2000 page 13 entry to have a. recall number. The opinion then concludes that the NJP should not be removed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05582-01

    Original file (05582-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an 1. enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that his record-be corrected-to reduction in rate, imposed at the 17 March punishment show that the 1997 nonjudicial (NJP) was suspended. 2 f. Petitioner initially applied to the Board in 2000 requesting his original effective date and TIR for, application, he contended that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00183-02

    Original file (00183-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HQMC Memos (3) Subject's naval record JAM2A of 21 Mar 02 and MMPR-2 of 12 Apr 02 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. an enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not reduced in grade at nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 29 September 1998. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00112-00

    Original file (00112-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing all reference to his nonjudicial punishment 17 December 1998, to include the punitive letter of reprimand dated 22 January 1999 and service record page 13 (“Administrative Remarks”) entries, in light of the action to set aside 13 the NJP. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected...