DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NA\
2 NAVY ANNEX
‘AL RECORDS
WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100
TRG
Docket No:
13 June 2001
8376-00
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
OF'
(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
1.
former enlisted member of the United
(1) with this Board requesting that
show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 code assigned on 13
July 2000
States Navy filed enclosure
his record be corrected to
.
The Board, consisting of Mr.
2.
Cooper, reviewed Petitioner's
on 6 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes,
Ensley, Mr. Pfeiffer and Mr.
allegati.ons of error and injustice
Documentary material considered by
regulations and policies.
The Board, having reviewed all the
3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
facts of record pertaining
a.
Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
C .
Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy on 14 July 1994 for
During this enlistment he was awarded his second good
six years.
In his performance
conduct medal and was advanced to AC1 (E-6).
evaluations for the period 16 June 1936 to 1 July 1999, he had no
individual trait'average
recommendation.
1999, the
promotion.
"must promote"
fo.r the period ending 1 July
In the evaluation
ITA was 4.29 and he was
reclommended for early
(ITA) below
.3.29 and a
d.
After completing the Advanced Radar Air Traffic Control
Course Petitioner reported to the
Patuxent River, MD on 9 September 1999.
Nav,al Air Warfare Center,
In the performance
evaluation for the period 17 December 1999 to 13 July 2000 his
ITA was 3.86 with a
recommendation for retention.
part, as follows:
promotevv recommendation and a
The evaluation comments state, in
I'rnust
.
. Outstanding Air Traffic Controller.
.
to his watch team and the Air Traffic Control Division.
.
A strong asset
.
.
.
He was honorably discharged on 13 July 2000 at the expiration of
his enlistment.
and 27 days of active service.
recommended for reenlistment and was assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.
At that time, he had completed 8 years, 3 months
The record shows that he was not
e.
Petitioner states that he
reenlistment code because he did not
year tour at his last duty station.
out of the Navy because he wanted to move his wife and children
to be near family members.
He regrets his hasty decision and
desires to reenlist and complete his (career in the Navy.
complete the required two
13e made the decision to get
wa;s assigned the RE-4
f.
Although documentation to
explain the assignment of the
RE-4 reenlistment code is not available, the Board is aware that
individuals who reenlist early could suffer a reduction in their
Those individuals are routinely sent to
reenlistment bonuses.
school and issued orders if they agree to extend or reenlist at
the expiration of enlistment to complate the required tour.
penalty for those who violate their agreement is the assignment
of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The
CONCLUSION:
The Board believes that Petitioner did not extend or
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
reenlist as he had agreed and the RE-4 reenlistment code was
However, the Board notes his excellent
correctly assigned.
record in the Air Traffic Control rating,' his admission that he
made an error when he elected to be discharged,
again serve in the Navy.
benefit from the reenlistment of this well qualified petty
Therefore, the Board concludes that no useful purpose
officer.
is now served by the RE-4 reenlistment code and it should now be
changed to RE-1 so that he will be eligible to apply for
reenlistment.
ardhis desire to
The Board believes that the Navy would
The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand why the RE-4 reenlistment code was
2
the change in the code.
assigned and the reason for
RECOMMENDATION:
a.
Form 215 to show that on 13
reenlistment code vice the RE-4
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by issuing a DD
July 2000 he was assigned an RE-1
reenlj.stment code now of record.
That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
b.
naval record.
It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
4.
the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
and that
ROBERT D.
Recorder
ZSALMAN
/g&z8
&WE.
Acting Recorder
i
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Executive D
3
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01290-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an 1. enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, this Board requesting that his record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code issued on 11 December 2001. filed an application with The Board, consisting of Mr. Adams, Mr. Pfeiffer and Mr. 2. The Board The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05328-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was issued an honorable discharge and a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy for two years on 8 May (ITA) of 4.29 in each evaluation. ITA of 1.0 in the unavailable evaluation for the As...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06595-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 6595-08 8 December 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD oF ae Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting to be reinstated in the Navy, change his RE-4 reenlistment code, and an honorable discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10137-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TRG Docket No: 10137-05 28 March 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ggasi Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. At that time, he was not recommended for reenlistment and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01904-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 18 January 2001. The Board, consisting of Ms.-Ms.-dand Mr. -, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 July 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10710-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting to change his RE-4 reenlistment code that was assigned on 29 September 2003, when he was honorably released from active duty. Regulations also authorize assignment of an RE-1 reenlistment code when a service member is eligible and recommended for retention. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned an RE-1 reenlistment code on 29...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03253-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service, separation code and reenlistment code. At the time of Petitioner's separation an average of 2.0 in all the ITA marks assigned during an enlistment was required for an honorable characterization of service. The Board notes his period of good service from 14 April 1998 to 17...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00640-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 640-07 19 July 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting an upgrade of his discharge and a change in his reenlistment code. This evaluation recommended him...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02760-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show thata better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 27 December 1999.2. In connection with this processing, she elected to waive the right to have her case heard by an administrative discharge board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-3B or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02338-03
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To : Secretary of the Navy Docket No: 2338-03 12 September 2003 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 T ~ G Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be...