Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08420-00
Original file (08420-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 8420-00
5 April 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 

15,52.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 18 March 1998 at
age 19.
On 15 March 2000 you acknowledged your homosexuality in
a written statement.
separated with an honorable discharge due to your admission of
homosexual conduct.
reenlistment code of RE-4.

Subsequently, on 9 June 2000 you were

At that time you were assigned a

However, the Board concluded that these factors were

In review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant a change in the reason for your
discharge since you admitted your sexual preference while on
active duty.
Current guidance states that an individual who
states he is homosexual may be discharged since such a statement
creates a presumption that the individual engages in homosexual
acts, or intends to do so, or has a propensity to do so.

The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by
regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals who are

discharged for homosexuality.
there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code.

The Board thus concluded that

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03914-01

    Original file (03914-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    .the Board for Correction of Naval A three-member panel of Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The record clearly shows that you were discharged on 15 March 2001 with an honorable discharge by reason of your admission to homosexual activities. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04854-01

    Original file (04854-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05068-01

    Original file (05068-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 5068-01 15 January 2002 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. authorized and normally assigned when individuals are separated The Board noted your contention that you lied for that reason.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06562-02

    Original file (06562-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    \ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 January 2002, the commanding officer recommended that you be honorably discharged by reason of your admission, and advised you of the right...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02849-05

    Original file (02849-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07563-01

    Original file (07563-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not At that time you were assigned a reenlistment code of You committed a homosexual act with another Sailor onboard a ship. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code must be assigned to individuals who are discharged for homosexuality.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03852-10

    Original file (03852-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 16 April 2001, you submitted a written statement to your commanding officer, acknowledging that you were being administratively discharged by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by your own admission. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08680-00

    Original file (08680-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01061-02

    Original file (01061-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. honorable discharge by reason of homosexual conduct received an At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment admission. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04090-01

    Original file (04090-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reenlistment...