NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02259-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02263-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend the petitioner's advancement to Petty recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02264-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 2264-01 13 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. McCormick,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02265-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2001. injustice were reviewed inaccordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A minimum average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02266-01
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2001. Since you have been treated no differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02271-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative theproceedings of this regulations and procedures applicable to Board. together with all material submitted in support your application, thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02272-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02275-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the consisted of your application, together with all material submitted naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02284-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY 5750 YlLLlllDTOW ,LRSOWWEL COMMAND IWTEQRITY DRIVE TN 38055-0000 1160 PERS-815 11 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Subj: Ref: PERS-OOZCB BCNR PETITION ICO SNM's DD...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02286-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. based on the evidence before him, The Board concluded The Board also noted your performance of duties prior to and subsequent to the NJP, but found that it was insufficient to warrant the deletion of established misconduct from your record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02287-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02290-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02291-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. if any, disciplinary action On 11 December 1980 you However, during (NJP) for four periods of absence and were awarded a $75 Your record further reflects that on 5 January 1981 you were convicted by civil authorities of three specifications of selling narcotics and were sentenced to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02292-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 November 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02296-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the IS rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02298-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. You were so discharged on 15 September 1999 and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02302-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02303-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the orders reassigning her to the USNS San Jose were modified to include reimbursement of use of rental car while waiting for the USNS San Jose to arrive in Guam. Petitioner must present to the Agency computing the money due a copy of all previous vouchers pertaining to the travel enroute...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02305-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02307-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 11 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. She was recalled to active duty for two The effective date of advancement to CTAl selected for advancement to February 1997 (Cycle 060) CTAl Navywide She was properly denied advancement to CTAl...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02308-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction .of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02311-00
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was approved and you were discharged on 22 August 1975. directed a general discharge on 3 September 1975. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02316-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 25 August 1959, you were advised that your request for correction of your record to show that you were unfit for duty was denied, and you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02317-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, Your allegations of error and regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02318-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps dated 6 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02319-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the STS rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02324-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 dated 30 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02326-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that as a discharge by reason of misconduct takes precedence over disability processing, you were not entitled to be discharged physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02327-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "A" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 0241. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bartlett, Ms. Humberd, and Ms. Newman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02328-01
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC (3) Subject ’s naval record nienlorandum 1160 PERS 8 11 of 17 September 200 1 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for NEC 3363. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Morgan, and Pfeiffer, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02335-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02335-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted under the PRISE III program and his 11 October 2000 enlistment is for a term of 2 years, vice 4 years. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mazza, Morgan, and Shy, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02336-00
You were evaluated by a Navy psychiatrist on 11 March 1997, and reported that you felt the Paxil was helping and that you were feeling much better. The increase was based on a report of treatment dated 30 November 1998, and a VA rating examination conducted on 4 May 1999, which indicated your depressive symptoms had increased in severity The Board noted that in order to qualify for disability separation or retirement from the Armed Forces, a service member must be found unfit to perform the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02336-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lightle, and allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02337-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02339-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of four The Board noted you had a period of three years in which you had no disciplinary actions and that you had nearly completed your enlistment when you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02341-01
2341-01 10 August 2001 From: To: Subj: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge and reenlistment code than the other than honorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02345-01
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 02345-01 applicant is non prior Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02351-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 235 l-01 27 December 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 02351-01 once a service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02354-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) provided the opportunity for active duty VEAP participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program provided they in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). A review of MSC record indicates he did not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02356-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone ETS W rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Procedures.of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02379-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. "A" SRB entitlement for the petitioner reenlisted, available for the SRB entitlement. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. bv the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02382-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion in finding that your selection by the Fiscal Year 2001 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board would have been definitely unlikely, even if your record had not included the later removed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02382-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02387-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At that time, you were not recommended for reenlistment However, on 6 April 1993 you On 8 April 1993 you were Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02395-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. (b) is the performance evaluation met on 21 March 2001 to consider Reference Board, Removal 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02397-01
The charges were referred to On 15 April 1999 you submitted a request for an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service to escape trial by court-martial on the foregoing charges. the good of the service is an administrative discharge and is foregoing contentions and claims recharacterization of your discharge you accepted discharge rather than The Board noted that discharge for 2 Furthermore, you requested guiltto the charges, and your rarely under honorable conditions. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02398-01
You were so discharged on 21 August 1987 and You did not The Board noted your contention that you have no Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. However, the Board concluded that failure to disclose a civil conviction for rape provided sufficient justification to warrant a non-recommendation for reenlistment and assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02404-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02406-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only Enclosure (1) is returned.