DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
X
0
MEH : ddj
Docket No: 2379-01
24 July 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 July 2001.
Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 26 June 2001, a copy of which
is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY l LRSONN5L COMMAND
DRlV5
YlLLllDTOW
38015-0000
IWEDRITY
5710
TN
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
PERS-OOZCB
t
BCNR PETITION ICO
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 27 Mar 01
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) NAVADMIN
( 1 ) BCNR File
050/00
049/01
1 . In response to reference (a),
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
a.
The petitioner reenlisted on 24 August 2000 for four
years to continue active service.
"A" SRB entitlement for the
petitioner reenlisted,
available for the SRB entitlement.
Reference (b) listed a zone
MSSS(OOO0) rate at the time
but did not list zones
"B" and "C" as
b.
C .
Reference (c),
released on 02 March 2001 added
MSSS(OOO0)
zone "B" to the award level list for SRB entitlements.
The petitioner requests to receive current zone "B" SRB
level payment for the 24 August 2000 reenlistment.
d.
Navy Personnel
Command/OPNAV cannot provide information
pertaining to subsequent SRB
has been released.
counseled concerning reference (c) prior to the reenlistment.
The petitioner's hindsight is not sufficient grounds to expunge
the 24 August 2000 reenlistment or to receive retroactive SRB
payment as no error or injustice was committed.
NAVADMIN's until after the NAVADMIN
Therefore the petitioner could not have been
In view of the above,
2.
remain as is.
recommend the petitioner's record
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use
3.
bv the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.
eenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01
Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02284-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY 5750 YlLLlllDTOW ,LRSOWWEL COMMAND IWTEQRITY DRIVE TN 38055-0000 1160 PERS-815 11 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Subj: Ref: PERS-OOZCB BCNR PETITION ICO SNM's DD...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05771-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. orders in June 2000 and was in a student status on 01 August 2000. d. The petitioner was advised that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07339-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner completed CT0 "A" school training in November 2000. for the Reference (b) provided a zone "B" SRB entitlement CTO(OOO0) rate: there...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02164-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 PERS-815 dated 11 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date of 23 February 2001 to reflect 02 April 2001 and receive the zone B" SRB entitlement in reference (c).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04056-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the extension agreement of 13 December 2001 and allow his OTEIP extension to June 2002 be established.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05241-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. zone the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02121-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03241-02
Consequently, on the applicant to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, demonstrate the existence of probable material error or the burden is in.justice. SRB entitlement for the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01599-02
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date of 18 December 2001 to reflect 01 January 2002 and receive the zone "B" SRB entitlement offered in reference (c).