DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 2317-99
28 June 2000
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 June 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, and applicable statutes,
Your allegations of error and
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board was unable to obtain your service record and conducted
its review based on the letter from Headquarters Marine Corps,
dated 9 March 1999, which you included with your application.
The 9 March 1999 letter indicates that you were convicted by a
You were honorably
summary court-martial of use of marijuana.
discharged on 4 April 1988 at the expiration of your enlistment.
At that time, you acknowledged that you would be assigned an
4B reenlistment code.
RE-
Regulations require the assignment of an
when there is a record of in service drug abuse.
been treated no differently than others in your situation, the
Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of
the
RR-4B reenlistment code
Since you have
RR-4B reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustiue.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04975-01
you were recommended for an Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous entry due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board, in its review of your entire naval record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, prior service in the Marine Corps, and your contention that a therapist found little or no evidence of the diagnosed personality disorder. Further, the Board noted that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06215-07
Documentary material considered by the Board Consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 2 November 1998, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 19. Given your BCD that resulted from a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07151-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than others separated for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05397-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Based on the period of unauthorized absence, you were processed for an administrative discharge by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05157-03
A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 11 June 2003, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06210-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The discharge authority directed your commanding The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, and your contention...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06285-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In support of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07912-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. record, and you have submitted none, to show that your actions while in recruit training were not as described in the psychiatric evaluation or that the diagnosis was not supported by the history and other information presented to the psychologist. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01349-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TRG Docket No: 1349-01 11 July 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04281-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The The Board...