Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02290-00
Original file (02290-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 203704100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 2290-00
27 June2000

This is in reference to  your application   for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered   your application on 27 June 2000. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 913E of 8 May 2000, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  The names and votes of

It is regretted that the circumstances   of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Enclosure

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

c

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

PERSONNEL  

N AVY 
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

COMMAND

Y

542 0
PERS 913E
8 May 00

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Via:

Subj

Ref:

(a) BUPERS Memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 28 Apr 00

Encl:

(1) BCNR Case file 2290-00

Enclosure (1) is forwarded with the following comments and

1.
recommendations:

a.

We do not support
reclassification as a TAR.

petition for

nlisted in the Naval Reserve on
ument (DD Form 4) includes a
guarantee for the Three Year Airman Apprenticeship Program, a

no guarantee regarding the TAR
s Record of Military Processing

"Three Year TAR Enlistment Program

(DD Form 1966) states in block 32 that the specific program he
enlisted for was the
Guaranteed Airman Apprenticeship Training".
never existed.
on the DD Form 1966 was due to administrative oversight.
_
salient issue is that
makes no reference or guarantee of the TAR program.
error in his record nor has he

We believe that the reference to the TAR program
The

suffered any injustice.

enlistment contract
There is no

This program has

My point of contact is  

2.
DSN 882-4508.

PNl

(901) 874-4508 or

Director, 'Naval-Reserve Personnel
Administrative Division



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08045-00

    Original file (08045-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 undated, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03211-01

    Original file (03211-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 11 June 2001, is attached your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory your a copy of which After...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04197-01

    Original file (04197-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. THE $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF A GTEP 2. WITH COMMAND INVOLVEMENT VIA GTEP RECRUITS SHOULD RETURN TO WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04544-01

    Original file (04544-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID THE GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF 2. WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE CASE, EVERY...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03895-00

    Original file (03895-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. Recommend the Board deny STS3 equest to add Reference Navy College Fund (NCF) Program enlistment guarantee to his master record. enlistment bonus are not eligible for the NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07022-02

    Original file (07022-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), the following recommendation and comments are...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01576-02

    Original file (01576-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07621-00

    Original file (07621-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 Ser Pers 402 of 3 1 January 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. was approved for Star re- ā€œCā€ school sometime during that 8 March 1996 SNM requested and was granted an OTEIP extension On USS Dubuque.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07343-00

    Original file (07343-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (DD Form 1966) informing him what enlistment guarantees he would receive and again, He also reviewed and initialed his Enlistment Contract ,made to him other than those listed on this NCF Program was not listed. lected to enroll in the MGIB Program on is entitled to receive 36 months of benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04965-00

    Original file (04965-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 4965-00 11 October 2000 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (4 (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(TAR), vice USN. The...