DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0 JRE
Docket No: 2326-01
26 December 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 29 November 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you were discharged from the Navy by reason of
misconduct/commission of a serious offense on 11 September 1997, with a general discharge/
You did not appear before an administrative discharge board because you refused to
comp1ete.d an acknowledgement of rights form, which amounted to a waiver of the rights
enumerated in the form. The Board noted that as a discharge by reason of misconduct takes
precedence over disability processing, you were not entitled to be discharged
physical disability.
reason of misconduct was erroneous or unjust, the Board was unable to recommend any
corrective action in your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge by
by‘ reason of
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07406-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2001. demonstrates that your discharge by reason of misconduct was erroneous or unjust, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06920-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An administrative discharge board which convened on 11 July 2001 found that you had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, commission of a serious offense, and driving under the influence of alcohol, and recommended that you be separated from the Navy with a general discharge. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01501-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board rejected your contentions to the effect that you resumed drinking alcoholic beverages because you were erroneously directed to stop taking your antidepressant medication, and that your command decided to “get rid of” you for misconduct because they were precluded from separating you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04924-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction, of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2009. You underwent a pre-separation physical assessment on 21 May 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06173-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08667-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06402-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps as an enlisted member from 27...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05882-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that any of the additional conditions rated by the VA rendered you unfit to reasonably perform your Military duties, and that you were entitled to a combined rating from the Department of the Navy of 30% or higher, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08662-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10188-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...