DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 2265-01
28 September 2001
Your allegations of error and
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support
your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 September 2001.
injustice were reviewed inaccordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 30
October 1958 at age 18.
two nonjudicial punishments and were convicted by a summary
court-martial.
totalling at least four days and absence from your appointed
place of duty.
reason of hardship on 25 May 1960.
Character of service is based, in part,
proficiency averages,
assigned during periodic evaluations.
proficiency averages were 3.9 and 4.4, respectively.
A minimum
average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable
characterization of service at the time of separation.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
The offenses included unauthorized absences
Thereafter, you received a general discharge by
The record reflects that you received
both of which are computed from marks
on one's conduct and
Your conduct and
Accordingly, your application has been
given the three disciplinary actions as well as the fact that
your conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant a fully
honorable discharge.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
denied.
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02014-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. average marks of 4.0...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01717-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Thereafter, you were separated under honorable conditions totalling 27 days, failure to obey a lawful The record reflects that you received The offenses included Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01445-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary action, and since your conduct and proficiency averages were insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable In this regard, there is no evidence of any medical discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04730-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03529-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Thereafter, you received a general discharge On 2 February 1961 a board of Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and proficiency averages, both of which are computed from marks assigned during periodic evaluations. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03849-01
3849-01 12 October 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 11 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. incident...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03209-01
you were told that after six months, your discharge would be The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and upgraded. contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three of service, and the fact that you failed to achieve the required average in conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02287-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05722-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and your failure to achieve the required average mark in conduct. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09586-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A minimum average mark of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...