Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02324-01
Original file (02324-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP:ecb
Docket No: 2324-01
17 July 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 dated 30 May 2001, a copy of which is
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

Y

1780
PERS-604
30 May  01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE  

DIRECTbR,

NAVAL RECORDS

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Ref:

(a) CNPC memo  5420 PERS-OOZCB of 1 May 01
(b) Title 38,

United States Code, Chapter 30

1.

The following is provided in response to reference (a):

a.

Per reference (b),

the law governing the Montgomery GI

members who served less than 36 months of a

Bill (MGIB) Program,
three-year or longer enlistment must receive an Honorable
Discharge and separate for one of the following reasons to be
pre-existing medical
eligible for MGIB Program benefits:
service connected disability, reduction in force,
condition,
hardship,
certain physical or mental conditions, or for the
convenience of the government (COG) after serving a minimum of
30 months of active duty.

b.

A review of Midshipman

entered active duty on
Midshipma
enlistment.
Program and paid the r
27 months of active duty,
to enter the Na
Since Midshipma
service obligation of 30 months,

record indicates she

97 with a six-year term of
z elected to enroll in the MGIB
On 24 August 1998, after

she was honorably discharged for COG
Officer Training Corps Program.
,did not meet the minimum active  
she is ineligible for MGIB
We cannot recommend approval of Midshipman

duty

request to extend her length of service from 27
If the Board does change Midshipman

record to reflect 30 months of active duty service,

'be eligible to receive her MGIB Program benefits.

Subj:

PERS-604's point of contact is M

S'

2.
reached at  

(DSN)  882-4260 or (C) 901-874-4260.

who can be

Navy Drug 

Captain: U.S. Navy
Director,
Behavioral Health, Federal
Education,
& Partnerships
Division (PERS-60)

& Alcohol,

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02272-01

    Original file (02272-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04703-03

    Original file (04703-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by PERS memorandum 1780 PERS-604 of 1 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. Only those members who were eligible to convert to the MGIB Program were notified of the opportunity. Records indicate letter was mailed transfer date from that UIC was 15 August 2001, which means the letter should have reached his command long before he detached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06060-01

    Original file (06060-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 6060-01 2 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ifnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05959-01

    Original file (05959-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was closed to new enrollments on 30 June 1985, Members who did not enroll before these deadlines Program (VEAP). references (c) and participate in VEAP. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to In some cases, members enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02600-01

    Original file (02600-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05914-01

    Original file (05914-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by which is attached. VEAP was closed to new enrollments on but reopened for five months from 28 October 1986 Members who did not enroll before these b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07306-01

    Original file (07306-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-niember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to enroll or decline enrollment in VEAP. Members who initially entered active duty during the VEAP era were not eligible for MGIB Program enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04826-02

    Original file (04826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01265-01

    Original file (01265-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on IO October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 3 April 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03841-01

    Original file (03841-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. b. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to There was no requirement In some cases, enroll or decline...